|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:30 AM Original message |
Wesley Clark Is Clearly Most Qualified For Secretary of State. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
1. He would be good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
2. I could go for Clark.... absolutely or Secretary of Defense... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:36 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. McCain's POW verbal tick eventually did become feeble though. I like the way Clark stuck to his guns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guruoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 02:44 PM Response to Reply #5 |
26. This was just Clark's way of rightly advising Obama campaign to 'get back on message' IMO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alameda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:37 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Me too....he told the truth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buck Laser (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 12:20 PM Response to Reply #2 |
20. I don't much care for retired military running DOD. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mz Pip (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
3. Definitely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
4. He is not in the running. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:37 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Odd that someone so highly qualified and with a squeaky clean record wouldn't be in the running. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoFerret (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:47 AM Response to Reply #7 |
15. Must be a conspiracy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 12:10 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. I think it has to due to military laws....must be retired 10 years or more? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 02:52 PM Response to Reply #18 |
28. Just ot become Sec. of Defense, he has to be out for 10 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 02:58 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. far as S of D. goes, he could be confirmed in that position. Senate has that power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 01:04 AM Response to Reply #18 |
38. I find that very hard to believe. Got a cite for it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ilsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
6. It's a terrible shame he isn't in the running. He'd be brilliant as SoS. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:38 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. If Obama is picking people according to excellence and on merit, why isn't Clark in the running? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nomaco-10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
8. There could have been a time that I would have approved this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
11. how is he more qualified than Richardson? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:43 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I like the way you compared Richardson to Clark. It's how I'd make the decision as POTUS-elect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 01:57 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. Slight edge to Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guruoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 02:59 PM Response to Reply #11 |
30. In Clark's particular case, military experience would indeed provide an advantage... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
12. Oh yea. He would be good. Is he even under consideration? I'd love to see Wes Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
14. I like him better for it than Clinton, Kerry or Richardson. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 10:53 PM Response to Reply #14 |
34. he;s an incredible gentleman on top of us and already has about every decoration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
16. True, and this is one of the things that's surprised me. That Clark's name |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
17. I LOVE Clark, but I think temperament gets in the way. He's too intense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
19. Secretary of Defense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
21. Or... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
22. I like Clark, but I'm not sure I like the message that promoting a 4-star general |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guruoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 02:48 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. Clark may prove to be the exception to your otherwise valid point... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 11:09 PM Response to Reply #22 |
35. Clark wasn't active duty military during any of our post 9/11 activities |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vanderBeth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
24. I like Clark, he's my number 2 choice. I won't be disappointed if he gets it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guruoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
25. Clark: "War is the last, last, last resort." ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vssmith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
31. I was hoping he would be Secretary of Homeland Security |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 03:30 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. That would be a very appropriate office for Clark. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merci_me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
33. I say National Security Advisor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 12:58 AM Response to Original message |
36. He's definitely a contender. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 01:02 AM Response to Original message |
37. hmmm ... nat'l security advisor? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zuul9 (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 01:06 AM Response to Original message |
39. Great choice for SOS, but would probably be better suited for SOD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-17-08 08:23 AM Response to Original message |
40. I think he would be a GREAT pick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 06:39 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC