Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Greg Mitchell On Mark Halperin's Claim Of "Pro-Obama" Pres

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 12:06 PM
Original message
Greg Mitchell On Mark Halperin's Claim Of "Pro-Obama" Pres
Edited on Mon Nov-24-08 12:07 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
http://www.eandppub.com/2008/11/more-sour-grape.html
*snip*
The Time.com blogger has gotten a lot of Web attention since Friday when, at a forum in L.A., he called media bias against McCain "disgusting," the worst display of media malfeasance since the run-up to the Iraq war (which Halperin himself was a part of, he neglects to say). Here's Halperin's full quote: "It's the most disgusting failure of people in our business since the Iraq war. It was extreme bias, extreme pro-Obama coverage." Getting much less notice was the response from Mark Barabak, political writer for the L.A. Times, at the same affair: "Look at it in it's totality, at the end of the day did the media serve its function, to inform people about who these two men are? Yes they did."

Much more in a coming post on all this, but for now see what I wrote on this subject recently. But Halperin himself couldn't be biased, could he? One recalls his remarkable letter to far right-wing radio host Hugh Hewitt last year when he declared, "I really enjoyed our radio talk and I appreciated the opportunity to appear with someone I respect so much....As I said on the show, you and I agree on almost everything we discussed." Halperin co-authored a book with John Harris of Politico last year, in which they titled one chapter "Matt Drudge Rules Our World." They explained that Drudge "is the gatekeeper... he is the Walter Cronkite of his era." The pair also declared that for any Democrat to win the White House in 2008 they would have to somehow neutralize and get past Drudge. In fact, Drudge, amazingly, turned out to be a relative non-factor in the campaign.

...

And who can forget Halperin's lengthy post at his site back in February when he listed 16 things that "McCain can do" in taking on Obama that the vanquished Hillary Clinton could not. The list included "6. Allow some supporters to risk being accused of using the race card when criticizing Obama" and "11. Emphasize Barack Hussein Obama's unusual name and exotic background through a Manchurian Candidate prism." Since he is close to McCain's campaign team, this was readily interpreted as direct advice and offended so many that Halperin later placed at the bottom of the post in red, Note: This is analysis of what is likely to happen, not advice or endorsement. And in that update he disingenuosly commented, "McCain has already been forced to denounce several instances of some of these efforts." Gee, wonder who might have inspired "some of these efforts"?
*snip*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, Halperin - how about when YOU lauded Drudge and Swifts because they were good.....LIARS...and
Edited on Mon Nov-24-08 12:14 PM by blm
so they were rewarded with heavy rotation airtime and had the media access that you and your mediacronies made sure Kerry and his defenders were either REFUSED or ignored.

McCain was treated worse, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Every time I am reminded of the Drudge/Cronkite comparison
my fucking head starts spinning around and takes 10 minutes to stop!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. LOL
Yeah...anyone that stands behind that comparison can't be quite right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC