Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Franken Camp's Claim: The Hand Count Is Over -- And We're Up By Four Votes!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 06:23 PM
Original message
Franken Camp's Claim: The Hand Count Is Over -- And We're Up By Four Votes!
Franken Camp's Claim: The Hand Count Is Over -- And We're Up By Four Votes!
By Eric Kleefeld - December 5, 2008, 1:41PM

Four votes.

That's how many votes the Franken campaign just said they're leading Norm Coleman by, with the hand recount now officially finished. In other words, with every single precinct in Minnesota now done counting (except for the one where they're still searching for the missing votes), the Franken campaign is claiming the lead. An extremely slim lead, but a lead nonetheless.

"We are not declaring victory -- we are moving into the next stage of the process," said Franken's lead recount lawyer Marc Elias, in a press briefing going on now with reporters. "But we are going into that ahead by four votes."

At the end of this hand count, it's worth restating a few necessary caveats. The Franken camp's methodology involves taking down the opinions of the local election officials regarding the challenged ballots, and assuming that the local referees' calls will be upheld by the state canvassing board. As such, we are dependent on the Franken camp's numbers and assumptions.

The state canvassing board are going to be the ones who truly decide this race, as they rule on each challenge one by one. The Franken camp thinks this process will end with them ahead by four votes, or possibly even more, but clearly there is plenty of potential variation left.
http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/12/franken_camps_claim_the_hand_c.php

Late Update: Just to be clear, the Franken camp is also assuming that those missing ballots in Minneapolis, which give Al an edge of 46 votes, will be found. And as we reported earlier, the votes could potentially be credited back into the totals even if they aren't recovered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Franken had better be ready to fight for it because if he gets the nod with a 4 vote difference....
Edited on Fri Dec-05-08 06:28 PM by yourout
it will degrade into legal challenge after legal challenge.

You can bet the pukes will pull out all the stops to prevent Franken from being seated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ultimately, it will end up in the hands of the U.S. Senate....
...where we currently lead 58 - 41.

Really sucks to be a Republicant, don't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. While I am suppose to be above such behavior......"Revenge is a dish....
best served cold"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. All in favor?
All opposed? Franken wins by a vote of 58-41. Congrats senator Franken, Mr. Coleman, get the fuck outta here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Randypiper Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. How you think Lieberman would vote?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. After January 1st it doesn't fucking matter....
...how that asshole votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. But doesn't Minnesota have some whacky rule that if it's a tie, they
basically "flip" for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. The Senate still has to accept the individual....
...and I don't think a coin toss is going to hold any truck with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Thank you - I did not know that!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Hey us North County district 50 voters were VICTIMIZED by Hastert and the House...
... when they swore in Brian Bilbray before they finished counting, and therefore in effect STOLE the decision away from local voters and made the decision themselves to put in place Brian Bilbray over Francine Busby to replace Duke Cunningham.

The Senate waiting until after the recounting is fully counted and THEN declaring Franken the winner is far more defensible than what Hastert and his minions did then!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. What was the final count on that vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why did David Shuster say this evening that Coleman's up by about 300? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Because he doesn't know...
...what the fuck he's talking about and he's quoting old news.

Lazy asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I believe that. Just like Pete Williams kept saying, about the "Birth Certificate" SC Case, that it
had no chance of being heard, and that the will of 44 million voters won't be overturned. He said it more than once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
24. Because that is the offical count as per the MN Secretary of State:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. The Star-Tribune says Coleman is up by 192 with all ballots re-counted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Get it right.
This is before challenged ballots are considered (as is Shuster's number). Franken is keeping track of challenged votes and what way officials were inclined, and if all those go as he expects, then he's up 4. I'm not sure whether this includes that strange missing 133 votes, let alone rejected absentees that haven't been counted but could be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. You get it right
I just reported and gave the link to what a neutral source is saying. I will believe that before I believe someone who has a vested interest in the outcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. That source is correct, also. But, it doesn't even try to take into account challenged ballots. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Doesn't include the missing envelope of 133 ballots. (nt)
Edited on Fri Dec-05-08 10:12 PM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Yes, their estimate includes everything but the absentee ballots
Re-read the O/P - it's at the bottom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. Ha-ha! I told my cousin Phil his vote wouldn't count--and I was right!
Seriously, folks, quit voting. You vote never really makes a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. I'm so glad we have president mccain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Sprat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
21. Reports of this recount have ranged in every direction
Until there is some definite call on this race, I am not going to count on anything from this Senate race. I just hope the lost ballots are accounted for and that the end result is accurate and fair. That's the best anyone can wish for anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC