The Kerry-Edwards campaign has nothing to do with the memos, one way or the other. And the corporate media outlets are hopeless. They're still drinking the Kool Aid, pitchers at a time.
Plus, there needs to be far more exhaustive and detailed research and confirmation done on this subject. The dots need to be connected and retraced, one at a time.
I'd be interested to find out more about Marjorie Connell, Killian's widow. She's obviously a Republican, and chastises us for criticizing "our president," but some of the things she's said just don't make sense when you consider them contextually.
"Killian's widow, Marjorie Connell, described the records as "a farce," saying she was with her husband until the day he died in 1984 and he did not 'keep files.' She said her husband considered Bush 'an excellent pilot.'"http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5963843/But then consider this:
"Gary Killian said his father wasn't in the habit of bringing his work home with him, and that the documents didn't come from the family.http://news.bostonherald.com/election/view.bg?articleid=43678If Killian liked to keep work and home separate, it doesn't make sense that he would discuss the merits (or lack thereof) of one of his many pilots with his wife. By the same token, since at least two of the Killian memos were "official" TxANG documents, and Killian "didn't bring his work home with him," Marjorie Connell has no authority to decide whether or not they're a "farce."
Another intriguing character is Rufus Martin, who, like the now-debunked Maurice Udell, insists that Killian wouldn't have written those memos.
"The personnel chief in Killian's unit at the time also said he believes the documents are fake. 'They looked to me like forgeries,' Rufus Martin said. 'I don't think Killian would do that, and I knew him for 17 years.'"
http://news.bostonherald.com/election/view.bg?articleid=43678But Robert Strong, another member of Killian's staff, says differently:
"Robert Strong was an administrative officer for the Texas Air National Guard during the Vietnam years. He knew Jerry Killian, the man credited with writing the documents. And paper work, like these documents, was Strong's specialty. He is standing by his judgment that the documents are real.
'They are compatible with the way business was done at that time,' Strong said. 'They are compatible with the man I remember Jerry Killian being. I don't see anything in the documents that's discordant with what were the times, the situation or the people involved.'"http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/09/11/politics/main642787.shtmlI guess it comes down to credibility. And something tells me that Udell, Connell and Martin would all be singing a different tune if they were testifying about this under oath!