Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I propose that congressional members oppose to the auto loan be paid the same rate as...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 09:05 PM
Original message
I propose that congressional members oppose to the auto loan be paid the same rate as...
their state's senator or representative.

Senator Shelby's example would be $10 each day in session for Alabama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is a perfect solution to the financial crisis that most Americans
are living with, and now our elected officials can live it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. I've long felt that Congressional salaries should be
the median income for an individual American. In 2006, that was less than $27K.
http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032006/hhinc/new05_000.htm
If they want a pay raise, they can work to raise the income of all Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Ding, ding, ding....
we've got a winner here!

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Here is what Senators have been paid since 1789
Edited on Sat Dec-13-08 09:32 PM by Jennicut
* 1789-1815 -- $6.00 per diem
* 1815-1817 -- $1,500 per annum
* 1817-1855 -- $8.00 per diem
* 1855-1865 -- $3,000 per annum
* 1865-1871 -- $5,000 per annum
* 1871-1873 -- $7,500 per annum
* 1873-1907 -- $5,000 per annum
* 1907-1925 -- $7,500 per annum
* 1925-1932 -- $10,000 per annum
* 1932-1933 -- $9,000 per annum
* 1933-1935 -- $8,500 per annum
* 1935-1947 -- $10,000 per annum
* 1947-1955 -- $12,500 per annum
* 1955-1965 -- $22,500 per annum
* 1965-1969 -- $30,000 per annum
* 1969-1975 -- $42,500 per annum
* 1975-1977 -- $44,600 per annum
* 1977-1978 -- $57,500 per annum
* 1979-1983 -- $60,662.50 per annum
* 1983 -- $69,800 per annum
* 1984 -- $72,600 per annum
* 1985-1986 -- $75,100 per annum
* 1987 (1/1-2/3) -- $77,400 per annum
* 1987 (2/4) -- $89,500 per annum
* 1990 (2/1) -- $98,400 per annum
* 1991 -- $101,900 per annum
* 1991 (8/15) -- $125,100 per annum
* 1992 -- $129,500 per annum
* 1993-1997 -- $133,600 per annum
* 1998-1999 -- $136,700 per annum
* 2000 -- $141,300 per annum
* 2001 -- $145,100 per annum
* 2002 -- $150,000 per annum
* 2003 -- $154,700 per annum
* 2004 -- $158,100 per annum
* 2005 -- $162,100 per annum
* 2006-2007 -- $165,200 per annum
* 2008 -- $169,300 per annum
Per diem is per day, per annum is per year
In 1965 Senators passed the amount what is the average medium income of US families today.
So Nearly $170,000 is too much for them in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PADemD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I wonder how their current salary compares to other countries.
Do you know of a good web site to search?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AwakeAtLast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. Look at 1991
Who was in charge then? Hmmmmm.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. The Democrats were
We had 57 in the Senate and 270 in the House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Or perhaps only the wealthy would be able to afford to serve
Is that what you want?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Since it appears that only the wealthy serve now,
what difference would that make? Public service used to be looked upon as a necessary sacrifice by those who served, not a way to line their pockets at the public trough, which is what it is now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. The ones who said the auto workers must work for the lowest auto worker wage in the US?
Yeah, I think those types should work for the lowest Congressional pay in the US. What is good for the "working class" is good for the "elites". And those that would push us all towards minimum wage servitude are indeed elite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. It would take an act of Congress...
what a gig! they get to decide their own pay. guess they don't need a union.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AwakeAtLast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Another reason why I want to be able to recommend posts
:applause:

Terrific idea!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Ding, ding, ding we have a loser here.
If salaries were the 27k you hope for only independently wealthy people could ever run for Congress. Probably what you want someone looked into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Remove THEIR pensions!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AwakeAtLast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. AND their healthcare!
Make them find it on their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. Or paid as much as their Japanese counterparts.
Since Japan is the new standard for our standard of living.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. great way to guarantee more and more corruption
tempting though it may be to cut the salary of people you don't approve of, but the only way to ensure that congresscritters are not owned by corporations is to make sure they ARE owned by we the people.

pay them a high enough salary so that they have no need or excuse to rely on corporations for wealth.

personally, i think their salary should be at least doubled, as part of a REAL reform package to really crack down on compaign contributions and bribery and post-political career compensation and so on.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC