Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Glenn Smith (Texans for Truth) calls Isikoff(Newsweek) laughably inept

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 03:52 PM
Original message
Glenn Smith (Texans for Truth) calls Isikoff(Newsweek) laughably inept
http://www.bopnews.com/archives/001541.html#1541

Newsweek’s article, “The Secret Money War,” posted today (Sunday, Sept. 12) on its website, is a laughably inept political analysis of the 2004 campaign and the emergence of so-called 527 organizations such as my own group, Texans For Truth.

I was interviewed by Michael Isikoff. In the interest of full disclosure, he bought my lunch. Then, in the story, he attempts to eat my lunch.

His account of my comments is inaccurate, but I’ve been around long enough to put up with that. Isikoff had the same difficulty recently with inaccurate reporting in his stories on Michael Moore. I’m proud to be in such company. I’d just like to correct one small thing, some errors by omission, and point out the story’s obvious and irresponsible anti-egalitarian bias.

I was never furious at John Kerry or his campaign. Never said I was. Isikoff made it up. I did say Americans were being treated to an Alice in Wonderland spectacle of draft-dodger George Bush attacking the war record of decorated military hero John Kerry. And I did say that even if the law allowed coordination between a 527 and a political campaign that I would not have done so because I wanted the independent voices of real Texans and Americans to be heard without interference from any campaign.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5974038/site/newsweek/

Like many Bush-loathing Democrats, Glenn Smith was disgusted this summer when a supposedly independent political group he'd never heard of, the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, began running television ads smearing John Kerry's military service. Smith became even angrier when Kerry stood by as the spots, funded by wealthy Bush supporters, started denting the Democrat's poll numbers. "It was like Alice in Wonderland," Smith says. He couldn't believe Kerry, a decorated war hero, would allow himself to be slammed like this when the president had never seen a day of combat.

Unlike other Democrats, Smith was in a position to do more than complain. A veteran political consultant in Texas, he decided to make a nasty ad of his own. If Kerry wasn't going to fight back, Smith figured, he'd do it for him. Using the Swifties as his model, Smith formed Texans for Truth, and registered the group as a so-called 527. That let him take advantage of a powerful loophole in the tax law. He could raise unlimited money, and use it for almost any political purpose, as long as he didn't explicitly endorse any candidate. That suited Smith fine. Instead of defending Kerry, he would just bash Bush. Smith cut his ad, which features a former lieutenant colonel in the Alabama Air National Guard who insisted young Bush never showed up for duty.

All Smith needed was money to buy air time. He knew where to turn. He called some friends at MoveOn.org, the hyperorganized, generously bankrolled liberal 527 group known for its own in-your-face political ads and its army of shaggy get-out-the-vote workers. Last Tuesday, MoveOn sent out an emergency e-mail to thousands of members, asking for quick cash to fund Smith's project. Within three days he had $400,000 in hand, including $100,000 from Daniel O'Keefe, a onetime "Seinfeld" writer and Kerry fund-raiser. The ads will go up next week in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and other battleground states. With more money on the way, Smith is already working on his next attack ad, featuring the newly revealed memos claiming Bush received special treatment in the National Guard. And what if the papers turn out to be fake? "It doesn't matter to me," Smith says plainly. The issue of Bush's service is still valid. "I wish we could be talking about jobs ... and health care," he says. "But you've got to play the game you're in."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow he REALLY nails Newsweek
"I fail to understand why the magazine believes the suburban mom who donated $25 to help shed light on Bush’s deceptions and distortions with regard to his irresponsible war record is some kind of political bandit when the wealthy Republicans who helped Bush raise – what is it now, $100 million? – go unmentioned."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Because issykoff is a
bush flunky. Like to see him so down, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. "He (Isikoff) has to earn his right wings every day."
He picked on the wrong man; it's good to see Smith calling him out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
President Fredo Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He's been wearing the kneepads ever since the Lewinski days.
Too bad he can't pursue Bush's AWOL with the same zeal that he pursued Clinton's blowjob. Sigh. I guess sex trumps wartime desertion any day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. issykoff is a zealot wing apologist and would
Not touch any scandal by them even if bush blew someone in the oval office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
President Fredo Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That is the sad truth, unfortunately.
And quite a disturbing mental image, I might add.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. That's NewsweAk for you.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC