Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pat Buchanan: Burris is a US Senator, Blago did his duty.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SuperTrouper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:10 PM
Original message
Pat Buchanan: Burris is a US Senator, Blago did his duty.
Pat Buchanan is blasting Reid for not letting Burris seat as US Senator. Buchanan said that Blago did a great job in performing his duty to appoint Burris and Reid is out of bounds! :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Reid is right in not seating him, the SOS of IL is out of bounds here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yep...
"Reid doesn't have a leg to stand on"

"Burris has the same right to sit as Harry Reid does"

"Blago is the Gov"

"He had a right, and a duty to name someone"

"Burris is the senator"

"Harry Reid is acting unconstitutional"

"Harry is now making deals for conditions on which a senator should sit, and that is exactly what Blago is accused of doing"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't know about the "great job" part, but he's probably right.
Legally...Blogo is still the Gov of Ill and has the authority to name Obama's replacement. I think Reid is just kicking the can down the road...hoping that Blogo will be impeached and Quinn can name the replacement. I doubt Reid or any of the other Dems would even care if Quinn renamed Burris, they just want to punish Blogo. Reid is trying to buy time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SuperTrouper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You have a good point. Reid just wants to buy time for IL politicians to impeach Blago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Reid had nothing to do with what happened today
Untile Jesse White signs the certificate of appointment, Reid doesn't even enter into the equation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. BS
Reid should seat Burris.

Why should Burris not be seated ? ...because the corrupt SOS refuses to do the job he took an oath to perform ?

Reid should seat Burris. And Illinois should start working on removing White and Blago from office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Give it up already
The Secretary of the Senate rejected Burris, not Reid.

Tell it to the ILSC, because it's up to them to rule on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Oh, the SOS is corrupt now, not Blago? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Thanks for reading my post. ...Jeeesh, wtf is going on ?
"And Illinois should start working on removing White and Blago from office."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
46. Why the "Jeeesh"? You did call him corrupt in your post.

And I hope you realize you are the ONLY DUer from Illinois who wants Jesse White kicked out of office over this. The remainder of us are cheering him as a hero.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. The poster said "not blago"
I pointed out that we should be working on removing Blago. The poster didn't read my post, just like you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Or maybe it's just your nice friendly way of addressing people ...

... that causes them to miss some details.

:sarcasm:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
47. Doesn't anybody notice
that pat fucking buchanan never has the best interests of Dems on his agenda and in fact might have an ulterior motive for wanting Burris seated?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Republicans want an easy target for 2010 and they want to cause strife. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. I hate it when I agree with Patrick J Buchanan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Research more and you won't. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Me too.
But he's been right on a couple things lately. His 12/30 column explaining the politics of the Gaza action was very good too. I guess even a broken clock is right twice a day, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
39. I do, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. Wrong. He cannot be seated until his appointment is certified by the IL SoS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SuperTrouper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Papers do matter. Tweety just quoted "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington"
where they ask Mr. Smith if he had his papers. Tweety: "Pat, you're wrong, the movie is right"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Why is political capital being expended on this?
All of a sudden Reid has a backbone and it's on this silly bullshit issue?

Yeah, Blago is a bad guy. His actions in trying to make personal gain from the senate seat, take back allocated funds for a hospital, and bully the Tribune's editorial staff, are unethical and arguably illegal. That will eventually be determined in court assuming he is eventually indicted. In the meantime, he's still the governor with the right to make the appointment. I believe all the players have necessarily distanced themselves from Blago and set up their political cover against future blowback. Let's get down the road.

In the meantime, Reid just looks bad again. He can't even pick the right spots to flex political muscle and it is infuriating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. They may be trying to avoid having an unelectable incumbent running for reelection in 2010
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I've heard that argument, but
why would he be any less electable than any other dem there? The only stain I have seen on his otherwise laudable career was being on the undeniably wrong side (for political reasons) in a death penalty case some years ago. Maybe this is really about one or two "chosen" ones Reid would like to see get the post or something.

It does sound like there may be a compromise coming that would have Burris not run in 2010 in exchange for being seated now. Given his age, maybe he should just do that.

In any event, the RW has to just love all the headlines on this day after day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Unelectable because he was appointed by Blago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. It is not a silly bull shit issue
I believe that both Blago and Burris are crazy. He will be nothing but trouble for the next 2 years. Probably vote with the repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
32. If things turn out as I think they will, Reid is creating political capital. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
34. Reid only has a backbone when standing up to Democrats
Against anybody else, jelly fish offer more resistance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
28. True. SoS is the problem here; he should have been certified
Reid did not help by his rhetoric, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SuperTrouper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #28
43. Blago just double dared all Dems with his Burris pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #28
50. the SOS is following his conscience.
Blago shouldn't have tried to get payola and shouldn't have seated anyone. Burris is a fool for acting as Blago's clown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
33. Untrue, this is an appointment and not an election.
The SoS of IL has nothing to do with this because there is nothing to certify. There is no law, yet found, on either the Federal or State level that says the IL SoS has to certify an governor's appointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. (15 ILCS 305/5) (from Ch. 124, par. 5)
Sec. 5. It shall be the duty of the Secretary of State:
1. To countersign and affix the seal of state to all commissions required by law to be issued by the Governor.

http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=197&ChapAct=15%26nbsp%3BILCS%26nbsp%3B305%2F&ChapterID=4&ChapterName=EXECUTIVE+OFFICERS&ActName=Secretary+of+State+Act

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Wow, you're right, I'm wrong.
Thanks for educating me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. The right wing desperately wants this man seated
It gives them a wonderful talking point about Democratic corruption at the dawn of Obama's administration that the media will happily go along with for the next few months/years.

Blaggo is torpedoing the party for his own personal gain. I hope he and Ryan get along swell in prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I disagree
and believe the damage is done. Burris seated or not doesn't change the right wing's ability to use the Blago scandal. I don't think they care one way or the other--they are enjoying watching Reid drag this out. Right now, thanks to Blago, the dems look like fools in the matter and they'll look like fools regardless of whether Burris is seated or whether the seat is vacant for weks or months while we wait for Blago to resign or be forced from office. The right wing just wants to see the daily headlines continue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. No, actually if things turn out the way I hope they turn out it will benefit Democrats. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. The truth is Blago has the Law on his side.
He has not been indicted. He has not been Impeached. He is legally
the Governor of Illinois. No matter what anyone thinks of him, he
performed his duty.

If this were taken to Supreme Court, they would side with Burris.

This makes the Democrats look terrible to the American People.
Purely political--the Dems are so afraid of losing the seat they
have made themselves look ridiculous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. The truth is that he doesn't have time on his side.
Senate Democrats and Jesse White both seem intent on delaying as long as possible.

By then Blagojevich could be impeached, allowing Pat Quinn to make a taint-free appointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. But if Pat Quinn made an appointment, it might turn out Blago's
appointment of Burris was legit, then there would be 2 junior senators fighting it out in court. This can only get worse on the surface for the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. I don't see that happening.
If Burris fought to be seated over Quinn's appointment, wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. The problem is his impeacment and removal would not nullify the actions he
took as Governor. The appointment was made when he was Governor. If you were to follow that logic, all of the laws Blago signed would be null and void.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. Not convinced.
You might be right, but I'm not sure the logical extreme has to apply here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
20. I agree with Buchanan when he said the Illinois SOS does not have veto power
over a gubernatorial appointment and that by not signing he was not fulfilling the duties of his office.

I think that is correct based on the facts. The Illinois statehouse had an opportunity to change the law regarding gubernatorial appointments and they failed to do that, leaving existing law standing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
25. Govs usually appoint
Blago hasn't been convicted has he? Yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
27. Does anyone really care
what Buchanan has to say? He is just a clown and a fool. I cannot understand why MSNBC insists on foisting him on all of us. Lock him away in jail with Bush, Cheney and the rest of his dumb ass friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
37. Buchanan also thought Palin would help McCain win.
sorry, no credibility.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayMusgrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Exactly, Pat B is a former Nixon speech writer.........not
a state of IL Constitutional, nor a US Constitutional scholar.

He's wrong at least as much as he is correct, and he is RIGHT of Center Republicans all the time.

Why anyone values the opinions of Pat B is a mystery to me. He's so yesterday, and so often wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
42. please do not qoute pat buchanan as an authority on anything....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cash_thatswhatiwant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
44. Pat wants Republicans to be able to run on corruption and someone appointed by a corrupt
governor in 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
45. Why the shocked face? Burris would guarantee that seat goes Republican next election.

Why do you think Democrats in and out of Illinois are doing everything they can to stop this appointment?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC