Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If they were forged, they were forged on a fairly complex system

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 04:40 PM
Original message
If they were forged, they were forged on a fairly complex system
These aren't normal fonts.

We've all noted the lowercase e's position with relation to the baseline. You can't do that with Word, but you can by going into the font in a font editor and raising the e.

You'd also need to create a few extra lowercase e's because you'd need to move them around a bit.

Would they go to the trouble? Ah fuck no. They wouldn't even think of it.

These documents are genuine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. i have seen the signature compared to other signatures
and i say it is the same person. he has a odd signature and would have to know what it looked like and be damn good to even get close to the signature. if it was just someone out of blue who had no info, they wouldnt know what to even try to get that signature and even then would be a hard one to copy

so............how did they get that on the page with different font
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's what scanners are for
Thing is, no two of your, or anyone else's, signatures are alike.

They would have had to scan one in at a very high resolution, fiddle with it some to make it look different, then place it on the page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. if i got more specific i would have pointed that out
Edited on Tue Sep-14-04 05:00 PM by seabeyond
that my signatures are never the same. but the slant is always the same. and the first letter of both names the same. the first name is generally pretty consistant but my last name, sometimes meat it is readable, a lot of times i dont care, just a line. i saw this with this signature. though they werent exact, it had the same slant and the k was consistant. also sometime he did initials, and sometimes name speeled out clearly and one was just a line

i buy the signatures
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The problem is they can't be verified without the originals....
and there are no originals. Here's my take on it:
This Bartlett guy who was the one who was supposed to have taken stuff out of AWOL's files when they were "sanitized" by AWOL's staff couldn't take the originals so he made copies of them. There would have been no need to "sanitize" the files if they didn't already have a good idea what was in them, so he couldn't take the originals because then AWOL's goons would have known they were missing. Instead, he made copies of them for his own records and let the goons have the originals. Now, since AWOL's gang knows there are no originals, and having thought they disposed of all evidence negative to the little asshole, they are saying they are forgeries knowing that the originals can never be produced to authenticate them. That's why they didn't mind releasing them to the press in the first place, because they knew the originals didn't exist, so they can call on CBS to provide them all they want and look like they're the good guys and Rather is the monster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snivi Yllom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. bingo
Get the originals out and settle this thing once and for all. I for one don't want this to implode in October. Get it all out now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I thought the docs weren't in *'s military files
but in the Killian's personal files. Most people didn't seem aware that he kept personal files, so I'm not sure if *'s people knew to "sanitize" them. I do wonder about this, though. I keep personal files and records, I rarely type them, and I never feel the need to sign them, since they're for my own personal use. I think we're looking too hard to find a big conspiracy here, and I think all this crap in the media is helping * deflect the debate away from the real issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zaj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. The Signature has been the one thing that keeps me doubting...
They are so wildly different that it makes me wonder...

I guess it's possible that a secretary signed one or the other of the docs for him. But I have a hard time accepting such dramatically different sigs are from the same person.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. They are protecting the boy who provides them with tax cuts
a promised elimination of social security and medicare, an endless war, an end to environmental regulations on businesses, no attention to outsourcing.

They are very motivated to keep him in as president!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC