Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's interesting how the Republic party hasn't seemed to yet realize the wee fact that

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 06:58 PM
Original message
It's interesting how the Republic party hasn't seemed to yet realize the wee fact that
911 happened on George W. bUsh's (R) watch after George W. bUsh (R) was warned...and went on the longest presidential vacation on record.

"Mr. Thiessen, in The Washington Post, focused his argument on the fact that terrorists never struck American soil again after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, calling that Mr. Bush’s singular legacy. “If Obama weakens any of the defenses Bush put in place and terrorists strike our country again, Americans will hold Obama responsible — and the Democratic Party could find itself unelectable for a generation,” he wrote."
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/23/us/politics/22web-baker.html?_r=2&hp

Now really...how can one say that with a straight face.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. This needs to be affixed in the first paragraph
of any bio of George W Bush.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. I personally am quite fond of reminding them that Bush-Cheney attacked the wrong country nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. I assume you are referring to their 8 year assault on the United States aren't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Didn't you hear?
Bush "inherited" the 9/11 attacks!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Republicans Determined to Strike the United States": PDB, 1/20/09.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sohndrsmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. I've been trying to repeat this myself, whenever appropriate...
All presidents prevent attacks numerous times. He ignored the worst in history. Therefore the legacy spin that there was something exceptional about keeping us safe - is irrelevant and ridiculous. Besides, he conveniently leaves out any domestic terrorism events that may have been smaller in scale, but are formally listed as terrorism nonetheless.

Bush is a travesty. I didn't think one individual could ever do so much damage so enormously, both to this strong nation and throughout the globe...

His presidency should be retroactively rescinded and stricken from the record as a legitimate Administration.

Or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. We should start saying Bill Clinton = an even better president by that logic of no 9/11's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bulloney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. The first WTC attack occurred about a month after Clinton was sworn in.
However, the persons responsible for the attack were captured, tried and convicted and we had no attack until 9/11, when Bush was president.

You don't hear Republicans using that logic in their arguments, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. 5 weeks
February 26th 2003

You point is well made
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. Marc was *'s speech writer: there's no reason to take him seriously
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaJudy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. And can anyone here imagine
Obama sitting stunned into immobility in front of a bunch of school children were he told the US was under attack? And then virtually disappearing from public for an entire day? Oh sure, I might expect him to evacuate to an undisclosed location for security, but not to issue lame boilerplate reassurances, and when the dust had settled advise us all to go shopping!

Or suggesting that the proper response to a bioterrorist attack is to stock up on duct tape and plastic sheets?

He may not be perfect, but he also knows enough to surround himself with really, really smart people. And to know when to heed their advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
12. I don't understand why they always "don't count" 9/11. It's always
no attacks SINCE 9/11. (well, I do understand WHY they do that, but I don't understand why nobody ever call them on it)

Was 9/11 like Katrina-- something the supposed professionals had to "learn from" before they could "get it right"? So somehow the "first" bungling is okay and should be excused?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I read a post comparing bush to a bad babysitter.
The babysitter lets the kids all run wild until the 3-year-old runs out into the street and is hit by a car. Then she locks all the other kids up in a little room in the basement. When the parents come home, the sitter brags that she "kept the kids safe" after the toddler was killed in the street, which was actually the fault of the previous sitter.

Does anything Republicans say make a lick of sense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
14. A friend told me that Fox News is saying...
...that because of shutting down gitmo, they will hold Obama directly responsible for any terrorist attacks in the future.

My immediate response of course was "Just like they held Bush responsible for 9/11".

I just can't believe conservatives in this country. They are the lowest fucking form of scum I have ever seen. If they were villains in a Hollywood blockbuster, we would complain that they were too evil to be realistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC