Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) career path will be VP in 2012, Potus 45 in 2016. She

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:05 PM
Original message
Sen Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) career path will be VP in 2012, Potus 45 in 2016. She
is the most natural vote getter since Tip O'Neill.

Her biggest problem will be the transition from pothole district politics to statewide tribal politics.

Also her seat will probably go Repub for 1 1/2 terms and then get broken up after the census.

I guess I'll have to wait until the 2010 rerun to confirm my opinion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe not.
She is a conservative Democrat. People are getting fed up with republican lite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No, she's not even close to being a conservative Democrat.
People are repeating things that are absolutely false. Name me a conservative Democrat who's in favor of gay marriage, Medicare for all, more regulation, and closing corporate tax loopholes to pay for middle class tax breaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
38. From what I've seen so far
she seems very progressive. Certainly, unwavering support of the NRA is a negative, but that's one issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. My money is still on Alan Keyes' daughter to be the Democratic Nominee in 2016. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
32. If Alan Keyes' daughter spouts the same rhetoric as her father, I really hope she does not run,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Nope. She's not like him at all. In fact, she's a lesbian. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Alan Keyes daughter is an out Lesbian and was basically disowned by her asshole father.
I don't know if she's actually a Democrat though. She could be a Log Cabin Repuke. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. I watched the presser today and did a bit of reading after the fact.
I wouldn't be surprised at all if you are correct. She seems very smart, is incredibly passionate about politics, and seems to be a quick study. She'll be interesting to watch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. you make the oddest predictions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'll take SoS Clinton in 2016, thank you.
Until then I'm going to enjoy President Obama :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. Hear, hear!!!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
31. I'll second that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cash_thatswhatiwant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 04:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
48. this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
56. 68 years old?
I prefer my presidents to be 55 years old or less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_Horrible Donating Member (173 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. No Biden in 2012?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pot luck Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Has Biden signaled that he's not going to run with Obama in 2012? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. In 8 years, Biden will be 74
He probably had to much dignity to subject the country to another mcain/vanity run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_Horrible Donating Member (173 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. But he could still be VP in four....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. Dream on.
She's not near as tough as HRC. Not with all that fawning and feminine posturing ... and NOT with that "little girl" warbling pitch of her voice. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TimesSquareCowboy Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. I thought we didn't try to negatively characterize female voice patterns?
Or is it now okay to refer to Hillary's "cackle"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. She can modify that voice. She likes fawning submission like ole Mika.
I'd bet money that Mika will be gushing over her appointment tomorrow.

Those kind of gals are not the kind of "sisters" who I identify with ... she needs to GET REAL - modulate the little girl inflections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. What happened to Biden?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. More Schumer/Clinton/DLC fantasies coming to the forefront of our discussions.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. Jumping the gun much?
Let's just try and get Pres. Obama's agenda passed, and get him re-elected in 2012 if he proves competent enough to merit it (I have no doubt he will, but reelection should never be considered a given.) Ms. Gillibrand will no doubt look after herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. You're as good with those predictions as Dick Morris.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. But I thought Hillary is supposed to be the nominee in 2016? Or was it Caroline Kennedy? I dunno, I
Edited on Fri Jan-23-09 05:20 PM by MetricSystem
keep hearing different names. I guess that's why it's best not to predict the future, especially 8 years from now. It's kind of pointless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
18. ...
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
20. ROFL
Luckily, we've seen your political predictive powers at work before! Needless to say, I think we're as safe from a President Gillibrand as we turned out to be from your last round of nonsenses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
21. Enjoy This While You Can
She won't even make it past 2010. She has the Schumer kiss of death on her. Seems he pushed hard for her, just as he did for Chertoff and Mukasey. She won't play downstate and already candidates are licking their chops. And why D'Amato was standing behind her today is a mystery but he didn't do her any favors either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. No mystery:
Those upstate roots are deep. It turns out that Gillibrand has an interesting political pedigree of her own. Her father is Doug Rutnik, a well-known Republican lobbyist in Albany. (That probably explains the presence of former GOP Senator Alfonse D'Amato over her shoulder at the announcement news conference.)

http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/01/23/kirstin-gillibrand/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Yes It Explains It
And that with her father won't help her either. Gives her a Trojan Horse shadow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #28
40. I don't know.
I never heard of the woman before today, so it's too soon to judge her. I'll wait and see how she votes once she's in the senate.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. I Ended Up Phone Banking For Her
Edited on Fri Jan-23-09 11:52 PM by Me.
Through Move-On. She was running against a creepy Con. However, as it turned out several candidates Move-On supported then turned out not to be progressive and pretty opportunistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. Move-On can take a hike.
Remember the senate vote over the Move-On ad? Hillary stuck her neck out while Obama didn't vote on it. She got pilloried by the likes of Giuliani who took a full page ad on the NYT blasting her for her support of Move-On. What did she get for all her troubles? Oh yeah, Move-On endorsed the guy who didn't even bother to vote. So, I'm saving lots of money since the primaries. There are several organizations that won't get a dime from me ever again, including and specially the DNC.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
23. haha ok --- in a DLC wet dream
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
24. Hmmm, no, don't like.
I have another blonde in mind for 2016.

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
25. Why am I the first one to recommend this fine thread?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #25
51. Because some of us do not see why Biden should be taken out of the ticket in 2012?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
26. It's not too soon to start thinking about it--you can be the Rethugs are.
Hell, I put my 2008 ticket together as soon as I sobered up from celebrating the '06 elections: Clark/Obama was my dream ticket--I figured that no one would be able to hold Obama's race against him if he spends the previous four to eight years looking over a president's shoulder!

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
29. I mostly agree
I don't think Biden's going anywhere in 2012, but if Gillibrand wins reelection in 2010 and 2012, she'll probably position herself for a presidential run in 2016.

I doubt Hillary will run, being 69 years old and having been in the public eye for well over 20 years by that point (at the presidential level, there does seem to be a bit of an expiration date - usually between 15-20 years after their first major emergence in the public eye). She *could* run, but I think it's unlikely.

And though I'd expect Biden to remain on the ticket, he'll likely step down in 2016.

There'll be a LOT of pressure to name a woman to the ticket in 2016. I'd watch Gillibrand and also IL Attorney General Lisa Madigan, who's likely to be Illinois Governor in 2010.

About Gillibrand: she does have a relatively right-wing record, esp. on guns, fiscal issues and immigration for a Democrat. But she also represents a right-leaning district, and she's likely to move a fair deal left now that she represents NY state as a whole. I doubt she'll be a Barbara Boxer or Bernie Sanders type, for better or worse. But she'll probably amass a voting record extremely similar to Hillary's (whether you like that or not).

She'll probably face a primary challenge from Carolyn McCarthy. She'll probably beat her. I would *not* dismiss this woman. She's an extremely talented politician. I suspect we'll be hearing her name for awhile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #29
52. IMO that SOS Clinton will run against President Obama
2012. Any success of Diplomacy with be shared with him. Being SOS will keep her name in the public eye. Not being in Congress will make her pretty much immune to any criticisms for less than successful legislation. She will be 65.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
30. and I'll start going to Hooters to look at tits.
Edited on Fri Jan-23-09 06:56 PM by ronnykmarshall
Had to use it again ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
35. And you reached this conclusion.... how exactly?
No one ever heard of her before yesterday and now you've got her VP in 3 years. Not saying it's not possible, but curious how you came to this conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. In this part of NY she is well known. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. New York doesn't sell outside New York
Hillary was the only exception to that rule since FDR ran, but then, Hillary was a native Chicagoan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #41
54. The woman doesn't even sell well inside of NY
At least not the area of NY where I'm from.

:shrug:

She might not even be a Senator after the 2010 elections.

Regards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
37. Something happened to Joe Biden?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. No, just time to make a change after 4 brutal yrs, IMO. Also, ever think it could be a
Biden/Gillibrand ticket?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #39
45. Those thoughts should not be spoken out loud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
44. Criminy. Every single new politician is the next President. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
46. I don't think so
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jzodda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
47. "She is the most natural vote getter since Tip O'Neill"
Huh? What? Where the hell did you pull that one out of? She's been in congress for 2 years. Yep 2 freaking years and now she's as amazing as Tip O'Neill? I'm from NY and never even heard of her before yesterday and I'm pretty well informed overall about politics, mostly national though not local. She certainly hasn't made much of a national name for herself and I have not read ONE nice thing said about her yet from the rest of the delegation, unless you think outsize ambition is a nice thing.

Comparing her to Tip O'Neill.....Poor Tip to be in such poor company.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
49. You've been wrong many times before and will be again
ANd whats with this natural vote getter bullshit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. Of course, here is another, former Gov George Elmer Pataki will try to unseat her in 2010. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
53. Great prediction, Criswell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
55. For which party? Cause she sure as hell doesn't belong in the Democratic one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC