|
"There are two types of people. Those who divide the world into two types of people and those who do not. I am in the second group."
______________
Some of us, in our mind's eye, see the fray from the trenches. Others see the fray from a distance. Neither is wicked or wholly useless, but I happen to prefer the later.
I find objectivity precious. None of us can achieve perfect objectivity any more than we can achieve perfect compassion, perfect justice, etc., but we can consciously make objectivity a high priority and strive for it.
We have filters and routines we can apply to our prejudices and emotions. Judges, if they are any good, often rule against their inclinations... against their first-blush perception of the good. They do not lack emotion and prejudice. They have merely learned to recognize them, and compartmentalize them when such is their duty.
The ACLU world-view is of the distant sort. There is a deep good in defending nazis, RW propagandists and nut religions; perhaps in much the way the Apostles sought out the grossest lepers. When you are defending a principle there is some satisfaction in cases where the facts are so unsympathetic that only principle can motivate you.
Why I mention this stuff: My standard for policy and national political culture is if it isn't cool when Bush/Reagan/Nixon does it then it is not cool.
I don't see the last eight years as a critique of George Bush. I see them as a critique of power.
Nazi exceptionalism is an intellectual cancer and one of the forces that guarantees that Hitlers will rise again and again. There is nothing extraordinary about a Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot or Bush. (Or, for the geeks in the audience, Colonel Green of Mars.) To pretend that the Nazis were a unique evil obscures the fact that the Nazis were an unsurprising expression of universal human nature. If it is 'hysterical' to compare anything to Nazism then we could not have formed a useful critique of Hitler himself! Hitler in 1933 was not Hitler in 1936, or 1940.
So I recommend that we do not attribute the evils of power to personalities and accidents. They are the very stuff of politics... an analog spectrum of abuses from petty to horrific.
My reason for thinking that Barack Obama warrants extraordinary scrutiny is because he is 1) a human being, and 2) the most powerful man on Earth. It's nothing personal. I hated George Bush like poison. I am, on balance, well disposed toward Obama. But if those perceptions colored my view of specifics then I would be like the people who trusted George Bush because they felt well disposed toward him.
(Anyone who thinks I just equated Obama to Hitler on any basis other than species, go to the back of the class.)
I don't trust any of these people and I think it is my responsibility as a citizen to not trust them.
(Many think precisely the opposite: that it is the responsibility of the citizen to trust. And that's where the trouble starts...)
|