Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rangel's School Tax Credit Bonds In Stimulus

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 05:07 PM
Original message
Rangel's School Tax Credit Bonds In Stimulus
The House Ways and Means Committee on January 22nd voted 24 to 13 along party lines to approve a revised $275 billion package of economic stimulus tax measures that would expand bond provisions. The changes to the bond provisions were included in a so-called manager's amendment that was introduced by chairman Charles Rangel, D-NY.

Other bond-related changed Rangel made to the legislation include authorization of an additional $ 1 billion a year for two years for qualified school construction bonds, a new type of tax-credit bond that would be created under the package, bringing the total authorization to $22 billion over 2009 and 2010.

http://www.bondbuyer.com/article.html?id=20090122OCM2WD5C

These are included as part of the tax cuts that the left is opposing. Please learn something about what is actually in this bill before you start criticizing the whole thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. But tax cuts sound so republican
good point and good advice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. This should be considered more along the lines of investment
or even infrastructure rather than tax cut, I think. K&R - you're better at this research thing than me :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. I appreciate the semantic value when Democrats approach spending via tax credits, but it definitely
has limitations. To me, while it might make it easier to pass, it also makes it harder to monitor the spending.

Rigby wrote about the difference between tax credits and spending programs a couple weeks ago in HP

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-rigby/tax-credits-vs-spending-w_b_155389.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Tax credit bonds IS spending
Instead of people receiving interest, like they do with muni bonds, the federal govt sponsors the bonds and gives people tax credits. These particular bonds have 30 days to go to states, who have 30 days to get them to schools, who then have to spend them on infrastructure.

http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=5624&type=0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I agree, but it is not classified as federal spending in the budget.
I'm interested in seeing how people react to Obama's National Infrastructure Reinvestment Bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Haven't gotten that far
I am just identifying the tax related measures so people can see that most of it is good policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Aah. Well,
I appreciated Summers on meet the press today
http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000003017643

dick gregory kept asking why they have to let the Bush tax credits expire (cry baby gregory)
Summers educates him: When you put money into the hands of those with very high incomes, only a much smaller fraction of it is spent and so you derive much less benefit in terms of pushing the economy, in terms of pushing the economy forward.

Later he also teaches gregory about the multiplier and how some programs create more jobs than others (duh)

Whoa, 60 minutes is amazing tonight...

good luck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC