Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Remember that $600/$1200 "stimulus" check we received last year?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:28 AM
Original message
Remember that $600/$1200 "stimulus" check we received last year?
Well, goodness gracious! I guess it was time to pay the piper! Our refund this year was drastically reduced... want to guess why?

x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Explain Please
Thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. We have to pay back the amount we received for our stimulus check on this year's tax return.
So our return was reduced by $1200.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanacowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. You did not have to pay it back
I don't understand why they would take it out. It was not counted as income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohtransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. You are correct. See below.
Stimulus Payments Not Taxable; Reports of Extensive Refund Delays False

The IRS has received a number of recurring questions involving stimulus payments and the recovery rebate credit. Here are some important tips to keep in mind:

Taxability. The economic stimulus payment is not taxable and it should not be reported as income on the 2008 Form 1040, 1040A or 1040EZ.

Refund delays. IRS personnel are aware of reports that errors in claiming the recovery rebate credit could delay tax refunds for as much as eight to 12 weeks. These reports are false. As the IRS detects and corrects return errors concerning the recovery rebate credit, refund delays are currently no longer than about one week.

One payment. In addition, the IRS notes taxpayers will receive a single refund that includes any recovery rebate credit to which they are entitled. The IRS will not be issuing separate recovery rebate credit payments.

http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=203191,00.html?portlet=6

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. But, from what I read back then,
It may have been considered to be an advance. No, not taxable, but to be deducted from any refund due now. I may be wrong on this, but I read it somewhere...(don't remember exactly where)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Even if it was taxable
it wouldn't be taxed at 100%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. Pay back? No.
We knew from the start that this was an advance on a tax cut that otherwise would not have been realized until we filed our '08 taxes. There's no "pay back" involved unless your withholding was way off to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComtesseDeSpair Donating Member (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting...
My refund was bigger than last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. So was mine
and I received an extra $39. Last year's check was $1161 and the $39 makes it an even $1200.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. I don't understand
Edited on Mon Feb-09-09 10:35 AM by Bryn
I thought Obama wanted to help us little people. Only corporations and banks got the bailout money, and turned around and used it on themselves with bonuses and continue to stealing from us with those bogus charges. x(

Why can't us little people get share of bailout money to pay for student loans, mortgages, pay off credit cards and tear them up, etc. ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. For starters, Obama had nothing to do with last year, so you might
want to redirect your ire.

And if you are a student, read this. It might actually happen-or not.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=5011123&mesg_id=5011123
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Ok, thanks
:hi: I just want to be sure that us people aren't forgotten. So many lost jobs, high credit card debits, foreclosures, student loans, high rents, etc. I don't have a student loan. I was speaking of us people in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. Ummm...
You might want to check this thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=3726983

Which contains this tidbit:
But the 2008 tax forms aren’t very clear about that. You still have to acknowledge getting a check on your return for bookkeeping purposes. And that’s misleading taxpayers — and even some professional tax preparers and early releases of tax software — into mistakenly calculating it as income.

and is sourced back to MSNBC...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
9. UR DOIN IT RONG
Trust me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Thank goodness.
I was having a serious :wtf: moment over here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. Nope, not taxable.
Go back to the drawing board and do it over. It is not taxable. You may have to document how much you got but it is not taxable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Exactly... If your 2008 income was substantially less than 2007
And you became eligible for more because you were totally or partially phased-out, you will get the additional stimulus payment with your rebate.

For example, if you are single and had AGI of $78,000 in 2007, your stimulus check would have been for $450 because you were partially "phased-out." If in 2008, you had AGI of $72,000, you would get your regular tax refund PLUS an additional $150.00 economic stimulus payment.

Last years checks were just an advance on the "Recovery Rebate Credit" for 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
15. the stimulus checks aren't considered taxable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. I thought that one wasn't taxed.
Alaska's huge permanent fund dividend with Caribou Barbie's added $1200 energy rebate, though, will be. An extra untaxed $6,500 income for my husband and me. Ouch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. no i don't actually but that's ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC