Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The memo's were a "plant" ...who planted? Will CNN/FOX and Tweety Help?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 07:59 PM
Original message
The memo's were a "plant" ...who planted? Will CNN/FOX and Tweety Help?
This was an "unexpected" bombshell. AND was a "hit" by Rove.

Step 1) Take down CBS

Step 2) Connect it to Dems

Step 3) Connect Kerry and shame him for the campaign and "poll it"
so that people would be "brainwashed"


However: the secretary lived to tell the truth of "content"


SO what do we have?

* We have all the media networks with egg on thier face based on the "attack command".

* We have repugs who wanted to start a CBS lynching in a day when they don't analyze anything in a day -- they were told to attack!


So ...who is going to "turn on the master"...who is going to "connect he dots for America"....the answer is NOBODY.

IT"S A FAILED HIT...shrub takes it on the chin and plan #2 will be in motion.


Remember this: rove and shrub WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ISSUES in this campaign. Kerry laid out his economic plan in the WSJ today. Who covered it? NOBODY

If you want to make calls and attack. Then "we should all know" who typed the memo's and gave them to CBS.

CNN, Fox, Tweety, ABC....want to help?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wurzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. After Lady Knox it just don't matter. That lady fried them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Either you expose who did it and it was a "hit" ...OR... you get hit AGAIN
that's the cold hard truth of mafia politics with shrub/rove

I just have zero idea IF they can track it back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Somebody knows the truth
but whether they're an operative for BushCo or someone trying to uncover the coverup, they're obviously afraid.

CBS has the most motivation and opportunity to trace it back, seems to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. what we need is CBS to "find out" who forged the documents
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hansolsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Yup! N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't think they were a "plant"...
I think there is another explanation...for why these documents tha are real but have been re-typed. They are not "fake".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. and your explanation is..?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. I don't know yet....But I think the documents are real....
But have been recovered perhaps from the damaged microfiche that was reported to have been damaged in the timeline of 1972-73...This could have been some of those documents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. IF you can get to the bottom of that...you have something
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. They Weren't Just Retyped Though. They Were Recreated W/ Incorrect Terms
Knox said they had Army terminology out of place in TANG document.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doosh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. i saw it coming a mile away
after the swift boat liars attacks hurt kerry, everybody knew the dems were going to hit back, and looking for something similar to attack bush on. Everybody wanted Kerry to be more agressive, to take action, rove just set his trap and we walked into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. If so, it can easily snap back at him
Knox confirmed the content. This points even MORE directly to some kind of cover-up, and the cover-up is always worse than the original 'crime.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doosh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. what helps
is the story is not going away, and I don't think Rove expected CBS to grow a spine especially after the Reagan's TV special.

But CBS and the "liberal media" has really taken a pounding on cable news, they're bending over backwards to discredit this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. Rather needs to get Sander Hicks on and tell his story...
http://www.hornsandhalos.com/downloads.html

They had Hicks on 4 years ago. It could be done as a followup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC