|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
quaoar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 01:19 AM Original message |
If Burkett had the original memos, why wouldn't he just fax those? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
speedoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 01:24 AM Response to Original message |
1. Maybe providing the originals is illegal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
henslee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 08:15 AM Response to Reply #1 |
9. If this is why, why not just give new docs and face the poss. conseq. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wickywom (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 08:18 AM Response to Reply #1 |
10. Thats what I thought as well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 01:25 AM Response to Original message |
2. how do we know..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quaoar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 01:40 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Because the secretary said she didn't type them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 01:41 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Who the hell knows. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quaoar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 01:45 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 08:11 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Why? The bottom line is theTRUTH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w13rd0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 01:52 AM Response to Original message |
6. If I were privy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
speedoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 02:12 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. That's a very interesting possibility. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formernaderite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 08:33 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. I think he may have "looked" at the docs before they were destroyed.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quaoar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 08:32 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Hmmmm....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC