Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DAMN IT DUers..... USE THE RIGHT BUSH DEFICIT NUMBERS!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ulTRAX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:25 PM
Original message
DAMN IT DUers..... USE THE RIGHT BUSH DEFICIT NUMBERS!
Edited on Thu Sep-16-04 12:28 PM by ulTRAX
I know the federal budget is confusing and politicians of BOTH parties love to keep the public in the fog. Even Kerry is using the 422 Billion deficit figure when that some 150 BILLION too low. It includes as revenue, monies being BORROWED from Social Security and other off-budget "trust funds". That loan has to be repaid... and the clock is ticking for SS. It will be running a deficit around 2015. It can only be repaid from an on-budget surplus, more borrowing, higher SS taxes, or lowering benefits to put off the SS deficit.

Since there's just a few weeks left in the FY, we'll know the actual deficit soon. Until then the current ESTIMATES for Bush's FY04 budget can be found here:

Download a copy of the CBO's "SEPTEMBER 2004 The Budget
and Economic Outlook: An Update" at www.cbo.gov

Scroll down to Table 1.2 CBO’s Baseline Budget Projections

Unified Deficit = 422 BILLION (number reported in news this month)
Off-budget surplus = +153 BILLION
On-budget deficit = -574 BILLION<<<<<<< THAT'S THE CORRECT FIGURE

OMB also has an estimate dated 7-30-04: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2005/05msr.pdf
This provides the White House's 455 Billion deficit figure reported in the news last August. You'll have to scroll down to Table 14. BUDGET SUMMARY BY CATEGORY where you'll see the real off-budget deficit is 600 BILLION.... with 155 Billion in off-budget surpluses being borrowed.

So 600 BILLION<<<<<<<< is the last OMB estimate.

Remember that Clinton had a true ON-BUDGET surplus of 87 BILLION in FY00. So the true extent of Bush's irresponsible fiscal policy is greater than if he was starting from a "balanced" budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. True - the Difference is mainly the Stolen Soc Security Surplus.
But Bush needs to finance his tax cut for the rich so why not steal from Social Security and our kids via increases in the National Debt.

You want "class warfare" against the needs of the rich?

/sarcasm off

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulTRAX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. maybe it's the opposite!
I think the evidence is clear that Bush is part of the "strangle the beast" conspiracy. If their agenda is to sabotage Social Security, Bush had to find ways to sabotage debt paydown and increase the deficit. A giant tax cut for the wealthy would serve that purpose just fine! Why not throw in an illegal war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Doesn't the official budget also NOT include supplimentals?
Such as our little coming out parties in the Mid-east?

That was my understanding anyway, if true, tack on another $100 Bil or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. The "budget" does not although the eventual deficit,,of course,must.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulTRAX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. supplementals
Supplemental spending is something thought of after the formal budget was passed. It's not in the original budget but the spending does show up in the deficit numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Just call it the Biggest Deficit Ever
Use numbers, use 422 or 600 or whatever number you please, but be sure to stress that it's the largest deficit ever, and that we will be paying it off for years and years after Clinton had left office with the first budget surpluses seen around these parts in decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulTRAX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. "record deficits" are too abstract
Edited on Thu Sep-16-04 12:58 PM by ulTRAX
I've debated Right wingers for years and my conclusion is they don't know the difference between a million, a billion and a trillion. Hell, I bet half of us don't really comprehend what a trillion is.

Bush has handed Kerry has a killer issue... but Kerry's reference to "record deficits" is just too abstract. Kerry COULD get the people furious at Bush if he just showed them what 600 Billion deficit or the Bush 1.6 Trillion debt was. Here's the math:

A dollar bill is between .0044" and .0050" thick. The paper is on the thin side but the areas that are pressed are thicker. I used the average of .0047.

A dollar bill is 6.125" x 2.625" x .0047"

$1.00 bill = .0755671 cubic inches

$22867.09 in a cubic foot... at least mathematically.

1 Billion....... 1000000000 / 22867.09 = 43730.968 cubic feet.

600 Billion (OMB estimate for FY on-budget deficit) = 26,238,580.8 cubic feet

This would cover a baseball diamond (90x90) to a height of 3240 FEET

600 Billion would cover a basketball court 94x50' to a height of 5580 FEET

600 Billion would an entire NCAA football field (including end zones and sidelines... 160x360') to a height of 455 FEET

As for the BUSH DEBT of 1637 Billion debt = 71587594.616 cubic feet.... just think of the possibilities!!! ;-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulTRAX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Five Skyscrapers of Cash!
According to http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/opd/opdpdodt.htmthe current debt is 7353.679708420 Billion

If a billion $1 bill were tightly packed, they'd equal 43730.968 cubic feet.

The total national debt would equal 321,583,532 cubic feet of cash.

This is in bad taste. It's just to illustrate the power of imagery. The national debt is so large that it would equal 5.4 WTC towers of cash. (each WTC tower was 209 x 209 x 1362')

I think Kerry should use such imagery not just because it's effective, but because if any true leader would take national problems head on and educate the people rather than try to conceal problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. And Don't Forget -- Bush Promised to Use the "Lockbox"
which meant among other things using the full deficit number without showing the effect of social security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulTRAX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I'm not sure Kerry isn't playing the same game
Kerry claims he'll cut the deficit in half in 4 years. But WHICH deficit? The on-budget revenue deficit? Or the "unified" budget deficit which includes money borrowed from SS.

I certainly hope Kerry isn't playing this game but I find no specifics at his site. Kerry needs to be educating the public about the TRUE state of the nation's finances. I don't see him doing do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC