Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conrad: Confronting Obama over budget was 'not a very happy event'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 10:58 AM
Original message
Conrad: Confronting Obama over budget was 'not a very happy event'
http://briefingroom.thehill.com/2009/03/30/conrad-confronting-obama-over-budget-was-not-a-very-happy-event/

Conrad: Confronting Obama over budget was 'not a very happy event'
@ 11:01 am by Michael O'Brien


Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) said that his having to confront the Obama administration's budget in the face of declining tax revenue was "not a very happy event."

"We really had no alternative but to make adjustments in the president's budget," Conrad said during an appearance on liberal radio host Bill Press's podcast.

"I was given the responsibility to tell the president that the CBO was dramatically changing the budget forecast," the Budget committee chairman added. "You could imagine telling him that we lost $2 trillion dollars is not a very happy event. But he took it very well."

Still, Conrad praised the administration's response to centrist Democrats' resistance on some elements of the budget.

"One thing about President Obama — and it was a reason I endorsed him early on — is he's one of the calmest people I've ever known in my life," Conrad said. "He instantly understood the implications. Does he like this? No he does not. Is he a realist? Yeah."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Is he a realist? Yeah."
So many fail to see the unquestionable need for that statement to be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. KnR!
Thx for the post. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. Obama pleased backers with a false rosy budget & will now agree to cuts-Backers will blame others.

The political game continues so long as the "wishers" and "hopers" continue to accept the manipulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Come on. I'm thinking he's a master player myself.
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 11:27 AM by babylonsister
Reach for the stars, get some of what you wished for, and wind up just where you want to be. It worked for the stimulus and for his election.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/15/opinion/15rich.html?em


snip//


But we do know this much. Just as in the presidential campaign, Obama has once again outwitted the punditocracy and the opposition. The same crowd that said he was a wimpy hope-monger who could never beat Hillary or get white votes was played for fools again.

On Wednesday, as a stimulus deal became a certainty on Capitol Hill, I asked David Axelrod for his take on this Groundhog Day relationship between Obama and the political culture.

“It’s why our campaign was not based in Washington but in Chicago,” he said. “We were somewhat insulated from the echo chamber. In the summer of ’07, the conventional wisdom was that Obama was a shooting star; his campaign was irretrievably lost; it was a ludicrous strategy to focus on Iowa; and we were falling further and further behind in the national polls.” But even after the Iowa victory, this same syndrome kept repeating itself. When Obama came out against the gas-tax holiday supported by both McCain and Clinton last spring, Axelrod recalled, “everyone in D.C. thought we were committing suicide.”

The stimulus battle was more of the same. “This town talks to itself and whips itself into a frenzy with its own theories that are completely at odds with what the rest of America is thinking,” he says. Once the frenzy got going, it didn’t matter that most polls showed support for Obama and his economic package: “If you watched cable TV, you’d see our support was plummeting, we were in trouble. It was almost like living in a parallel universe.”

For Axelrod, the moral is “not just that Washington is too insular but that the American people are a lot smarter than people in Washington think.”

snip//

In any event, the final score was unambiguous. The stimulus package arrived with the price tag and on roughly the schedule Obama had set for it. The president’s job approval percentage now ranges from the mid 60s (Gallup, Pew) to mid 70s (CNN) — not bad for a guy who won the presidency with 52.9 percent of the vote. While 48 percent of Americans told CBS, Gallup and Pew that they approve of Congressional Democrats, only 31 (Gallup), 32 (CBS) and 34 (Pew) percent could say the same of their G.O.P. counterparts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Reality sucks for some.
For the rest of us it's life. Not many like being manipulated by the members of their own party who refuse reality. We "wishers" and "hopers" took a hard look at reality a long time ago, it is what it is. And no, in the real world, you do not always win everything you want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC