Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

David Paterson lost us a seat tonight.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:06 PM
Original message
David Paterson lost us a seat tonight.
Edited on Tue Mar-31-09 09:24 PM by Drunken Irishman
And now we get to hear over the next week or so how New Yorkers -- from one of the most liberal states in the most liberal region in America -- rebuked Obama.

Fucking great. :eyes:

I'm an idiot and spoke too soon.

Or a genius and totally jinxed Tedisco!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's what happen when one gets a brain fart,
and the media gets involved more than they needed to.

I'd prefer to have had Caroline Kennedy as senator,
and leave everything else as it was.

But noooooo, couldn't have that. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Or at least someone from a liberal area of the state.
He knew this was a risky move, plucking a congresswoman from a very conservative district. That was an open invite to the GOP and they took it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Murphy just made up about 1000k
now it is

County Precincts Total 588/610

Scott Murphy (Dem) 73,421
50%


James Tedisco(GOP) 73,523
50%


http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2009/by_county/NY_US_House_0331.html?SITE=NYSAR&SECTION=POLITICS

not over yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That would have been too
fucking brilliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Too fucking evident......
better to fight and claw our way through it all,
and then when shit happens,
scratch our ass and try to figure out what went wrong.

We do this kind of stoopid shit, time and time again.
Better to grab a gun toting red leaning Democrat and the lose of a seat.
But of course, Caroline said stuff like "You know"....

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Didn't have that Vision thing..
And, there was some real nasty repuke like shit thrown at Caroline Kennedy. Wonder who was responsible for that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Eh, good luck trying to overshadow the Obamas first trip to Europe.
They'll try of course, but it's going to be hard to convince people that a Republican winning a Republican district is really more important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. A district with 70,000 more republicans than Democrats, and it's HIS fault the Dem lost?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. That's the problem.
He took a Dem congresswoman out of a seat that Democrats have traditionally lost and left it open for another Democrat to come in and win. That's asking a lot, even for an area that went to Obama in 2008. He should have been more political aware about the demographics there and chosen someone who the Dems could have easily replaced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Wonder if he'll get the credit if the Dem wins...
:rofl:

Sorry - I dunno what I was thinking there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
36. Sure, but was it worth the risk?
It's a stupid move to take a Democrat who found a way to win in a solid Republican district, when he could have found just as many qualified Democrats from safe areas in the state.

Just because the candidate might win doesn't mean the move was any less dumb. I mean, this is what we call pulling a Homer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. And we might end up
losing the Senate seat she was given too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. They started that analogy up early this morning. Caroline
Kennedy would have voted the right way and would have been good for New York in my opinion. This entire mess could have been avoided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. But she said, "You know" too many times!
and she didn't have the "right" kind of experience, they said.
and Lord forbid, she was just a Kennedy, after all!
Who'd want that hanging out around the Senate? :eyes:

She's probably laughing about the utter dumbness of
all of it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. Chuck Schumer didn't want her, distracting from his star, made it all impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TuxedoKat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #29
58. Chuck Schumer
The most dangerous place to be? "Fetween Chuck Schumer and a video camera".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:16 PM
Original message
As I recall, it wasn't David Paterson who began the lynch mob against Caroline Kennedy.
And I'll leave it at that.

But really, losing this seat is not such a big deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
28. Oh, You're Joking
Paterson didn't say anything *publicly* against CK, he wasn't that stupid. But his office leaked like a sieve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. That was how it ended, not how it began. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. Gibbs said it best:
Even hours before polls closed, the White House was portraying the vote as a win for Democrats no matter the outcome because of inroads they have made in the district, which has more Republicans registered and a long history, until recently, of electing GOP candidates.

"To even be competitive in a district like that, I think says a lot," press secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters on Air Force One as Obama traveled to London.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jvFtnxqBwuwEltwfNBZytBYwy5HQD979CKH00
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. I was listening to local news tonight
'cause it was on at my sister's..and every 10 minutes there was a Negative ad against Scott Murphy saying he voted with AIG or some such thing. They must have had a lot of money to pour in there for negative ads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. It's the republican way. They are a failed ideology and bereft of ideas.
The only way they can win elections, is try and slim their opponents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. That's right..and I'm not exaggerating
about the amount of ads that were blared on election day..I can imagine how it was leading up to today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. Ok, maybe I spoke too soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asphalt.jungle Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. hehe
hopefully you jinxed it for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. now murphy is UP by 252
with 3 precincts to go

County Precincts Scott Murphy (Dem) James Tedisco (GOP)
Total 607/610 76,573 50% 76,321 50%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. 252?
Sounds a lot like Minnesota. Good luck New York.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. Upstate New York is not a liberal region
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. I saw on the news tonight that the registration rolls skew Republican
The range I saw was a 71K Republican advantage in a district with 400K people. Ah, that is a big disadvantage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
38. Oh yeah, a big disadvantage
Upstate is pretty rural. I guess people see "New York" and figure it's mostly liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lavender Brown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #38
45. It's a hugely random, gerrymandered Republican district.... I live in a bordering district
Edited on Tue Mar-31-09 10:45 PM by Lavender Brown
that is largely Democratic because it includes the cities that the 20th just weaves around. It's so oddly shaped as not to be truly representative of any region. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #16
55. No, it's not.
There are small pockets of liberals on a largely conservative landscape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
18. Not over yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
19. Change your title to "David Paterson MAY HAVE lost us a seat tonight."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. No, cause I jinxed the Repubs with this!
So we gotta keep it up until it's official! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
23. 81 votes up with one precinct to go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
30. nonsense.. It's astonishing that that district went for Obama....
They are very conservative up that way. There are mostly registered Repugs there. If it's even close it's a slap in the face to the Repugs..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. That is the point.
The biggest complaint I have with Paterson is that he took a Democrat from an area where Democrats don't win, instead of finding a Democrat from a safe area. IF Murphy loses, that's one less seat in the house now the Democrats have. Yeah, it's just one, but it's one that shouldn't have become open in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
32. Thank you for jinxing Teh Disco.
How far in advance do people cast their absentee ballots in an election like this?

Murphy wasn't really surging until about 2 weeks ago.


:bitingnails:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
34. Steele likely was counting on a victory swing after tonight but
it could be that the voters of that district will be denying him that photo-op.

It's a mighty close call up there, from the Albany news web sites. A few thousand votes still to count, Murphy now up by a few dozen votes.

Damn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
35. NY-20
This IS a cosnervate Districk although Obama carried It In 2008.Murphy could pull It off still very narrowly.

If he doesn't get ready for Republicans to spin It as a rebuke of Obama even through whoever wins It will be a narrow margain,and
Obama didn't campagin.

At one point Murphy was thought to surely lose and he will eather narrorly win or narrorly lose.

If he does win Michael Steele Is the real loser.

If Murphy loses Paterson Is the big loser.Another reason Patterson Is a goner If Andrew Curmo runs for Governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. It's going to be the battle of the spin.
My fear is that the media will spin against Obama, since they've been like sharks circling their prey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
37. Drunken Irishman lost his mind tonight
It's ok, man. I was feeling your pain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Wouldn't be the first time, nor the last.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
39. May I interest you in a heaping serving of crow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Wait until it's official and then I'll gladly eat it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. :) No biggie. It'll never match the Seabiscuit thread.
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Yes, that was the greatest thread ever.
Especially the cover.

"OH I WAS JUST JOKING!"

haha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #41
46. Yeah, I'd rather be
all bummed out 'cause we thought we lost and then are wrong than think we're going to win and find out we have a 8 year nightmare in front of us:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
47. WIPEOUT!!! 35% reporting in Indiana: Clinton up by 14points!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Nothing like re-living the good times....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Winning Indiana is a fucking valuable thing
(facepalm) - :P


I am so glad that I was DisDUconnected during that thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #48
52. how did I miss that thread?
that was a thing of beauty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #52
53. Aw shit - you missed out tiger. That was some true fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
50. I heard there's a rumor that Murphy put in a call to Norm Coleman to see if he could
borrow Norm's legal team. Just in case.


:evilgrin:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #50
54. Indeed, an ex parte motion was filed before the polls even closed by the state republican party...
with the goal of overturning the election, if it doesn't come out right for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #54
59. No kidding?? I was being facetious. But why would I be surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liskddksil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
51. No matter what happens with this race
I sure will be voting for whoever runs against Patterson and Gillibrand in a primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
56. it was funny
Because Michael Steele was the first person Tedisco "thanked" when he spoke to his supporters, but when a local newsguy pulled him aside to interview him and asked when the RNC helped or hurt, he was like "Oh, they helped. I don't think they hurt, but...But my campaign got better when I took charge of it."

Even my local news was saying that because Murphy is narrowly ahead before absentee ballots, it is bad news for the Republican party even if they eek out a win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lolamio Donating Member (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
57. Even with this close outcome, I am still frustrated with Patterson...
We could have avoided all of this if he had just appointed Cuomo from the start. The Kennedy fiasco, this special election - none of this would have happened if Patterson had just used his head. I remember hearing early on what great political instincts he had. I have yet to see any evidence of that. Furthermore, I'll never forgive him if Pataki runs against Gillibrand and defeats her. The only hope I see as a New Yorker is that Cuomo runs in the primary against Patterson for governor and defeats him. Otherwise, Patterson is a lost cause in the 2010 elections and the state Democratic Party could be in trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
60. hey Murphy won the votes last night by 65
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC