Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Card check (EFCA) is dead and no it's not Obama's fault

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 06:32 PM
Original message
Card check (EFCA) is dead and no it's not Obama's fault
Feinstein is backing off of supporting it, and if Feinstein's publically backing off, you can bet people like Blanche Lincoln are as well.

Dem senator delivers blow to union bill
By J. Taylor Rushing
Posted: 03/31/09 03:32 PM
California Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D) on Tuesday told Capitol Hill reporters that she is skeptical of the Employee Free Choice Act, possibly dealing another deadly blow to the legislation.

Feinstein's skepticism, coming a week after Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) announced his opposition, means Democratic leaders might find themselves in an even deeper hole as they search for 60 votes to move the so-called "card-check" bill.

"I think in this economy that what has to happen is that the unions and management get together and try to see if they can work out something," Feinstein said. "The card-check bill, as drafted, in this economy, is extraordinarily difficult and I think almost a lightning rod to dissent. I think there are some things that can be done. I've talked with both sides and continue to talk to both sides to see if it isn't possible to work something out."

Feinstein hedged when asked if she was definitely opposed.

"I'm not on the bill, and I said what I said," she said.

Specter's announcement last week was widely seen as political, given that polling has shown him with a double-digit deficit against former Rep. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) in the 2010 race. Specter defeated Toomey by just 2 percentage points in 2004, and it is estimated that as many as 200,000 centrist Republicans have since switched their allegiance to the Democratic Party.

<snip>

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/sen.-feinstein-not-sold-on-card-check-bill-2009-03-31.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. The wuss wing of the Party has spoken
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. This was over the day Specter said NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Isn't there anything we can do? Feinstein really needs to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. We can alway look forward to some right wing platitudes from Ms Feinstein.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Feinstein! Why is she there? What is her purpose? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. To enrich herself and her husband's companies.
And it has been working very well. Thanks to the taxpayers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. She needs to go. She is horrible. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. How are Snowe and Collins looking on this?
Not that it will matter since there will likely be some Democratic defections. It's not Obama's fault, but Congress could use some prodding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. They voted against t last time, This has NO Repuke support. NONE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RepublicanElephant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. these back-stabbing dems are gonna make for some very interesting primary races...
...where they have to explain in a debate why they didn't support president obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Unfortunately there are many years left to Feinstein's term.
I wish she gave an indication of what a turncoat she was going to evolve into before the last election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. This was over the day Specter backed out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. The old guard is playing hardball
I hope they get smacked the fuck down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamieque Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Here is how you can get rid of her and others like her...
Recall them back home. In other words threaten her and the others like her with Electon Recall. Check your laws in your particular states on what can be done to recall those public servants aka Democrats or Republican who are doing what is best for their own polictical gain and not for us the taxpayers who pay them.

Our taxes pay their salaries so they have a obligation to serve us not the 'Special Interest' groups. So my solution to the problem is just recall them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
15. Feinstein is such a Rethug lite at times its sickening.
Remember the whole Leon Panetta at CIA dust up? No one asked her about it and she got ticked at Obama. I really don't like her at all. 15 years ago maybe I thought she was okay but not now. Barbara Boxer on the other hand is great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
16. This is Feinstein running for Governor.
If ever there were a more clear indication of one's intentions, I'd be happy to entertain it.

It's all political posturing to help her assure the nomination in a crowded primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liskddksil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. and she expects unions to help her when running for governor?
good luck with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. No, she expects the business community to help her.
The idea is this: You'll likely have a half dozen or so candidates for the Democratic nomination, right? Well, that certainly is going to water down the unions. They can't/won't support them all. However, if Feinstein can be the pro-business Democratic nominee for Governor in a state that will likely elected whomever the Dems nominate, well, that might well trump the unions, unless they choose to back one horse and never look back (which is really not the ideal situation for them, nor is it something they could even really guarantee, as members tend to have minds of their own).

So in a fucked up sort of way - yeah, this might actually help her wind up being Governor. It's a risk - no doubt about it - but it's a very calculated one unless the primary becomes a 2 horse race (not very likely).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. sad but true. Business will do anything to get an obedient servant in there, hence Schwarzenegger
who never would have gotten in in the first place (at least as a Republican) if he hadn't be shoe-horned in with that recall coup.

What is frustrating is Republicans are willing to do those hail mary passes, but Democrats don't seem to even run with the ball when the field is clear in front of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. Give money to California Clean Money to clear out moral filth like her:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
18. why were the Republicans under Bush
able to get bill after bill passed, even when there was a Democratic majority in the Senate, while every time "we" try to get something passed the number "60" comes up?

At what point are the Democrats going to start representing the people who put them in office? Isn't that what we've all been fighting for these last eight years? Democratic control of both the Congress and the Executive?

I have put aside many of my core political beliefs these last eight years to advocate for Democratic control, and this is the payoff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Our "government" is effective and provides outstanding representation.
Unfortunately, it's not representing us anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Because 10-15% of Senate Democrats are pure Rightist on economic issues.

There is no comparable percentage of Republicans who favor the working class.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. We should be able to get 51 votes
period.

Put it to the test, let the Republicans filibuster. Let the Blue dogs have their say - let's lay it on the table so that the members of the party can see where their party really stands.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. I like that idea. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #22
30. The key is
not getting the 51 votes, it's finding out what they've deleted from the bill
before it gets to the 51 votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Because apparently the Phantom Filibuster is sooooo terrifying to these people. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. that's just an excuse. It's really business-owned Dems doing their masters' bidding
in Feinstein's case, her husband is the business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. I was being sarcastic. I am well aware that these people are completely 100% full of shit.
Edited on Thu Apr-02-09 11:35 AM by Guy Whitey Corngood
Some actual representation would be n ice for a change. In Feinstein's case her and "Mr Feinstein" have made a killing in the last few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
24. translation: at a time like this, the rich need to be free to hoard the fruits of your labor...
In reality, times of economic hardship are when we need unions most because you can't leave your job and immediately get another one. If workers don't band together then, they are at the mercy of their employer who can cut their wages, hours, and benefits to the bone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
28. She is an ass
California election could not come soon enough to oust this republican
patronizer.

No surprise there from her, she is not for the common man, since her
husband is riding on that $600 billion deal he got from Bush.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
32. it's not Obama's fault, but he's not helping
ok Feinstein is backing off. Would she be backing off if Obama was pushing it? Even Arlen Specter, Blanche Lincoln, Mark Pryor, etc., their positions could be affected by Obama's commitment to the legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
33. I just called her office and they said she isn't opposing it, which wasn't a ringing endorsement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
34. If you live in CA, it may be time to VISIT one of her offices
Call up and ask to make an appointment with a legislative aide, or better yet, just show up.

I've heard that for every letter politicians get, they think there are ten more people who feel the same way but were too lazy to write.

If someone actually shows up, that should be multiplied by a hundred.

Please feel free to call or write the office nearest you, or you can visit one of the offices between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. We are here to serve you.

San Francisco
One Post Street, Suite 2450
San Francisco, CA 94104
Phone: (415) 393-0707
Fax: (415) 393-0710

The following counties are served by the San Francisco office: Alameda, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Del Norte, El Dorado, Glenn, Humboldt, Lake, Lassen, Marin, Mendocino, Modoc, Monterey, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Benito, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Solano, Sonoma, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Yolo, Yuba.


Los Angeles
11111 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 915
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Phone: (310) 914-7300
Fax: (310) 914-7318

The following counties are served by the Los Angeles office: Los Angeles, Santa Barbara, Ventura.


San Diego
750 B Street, Suite 1030
San Diego, CA 92101
Phone: (619) 231-9712
Fax: (619) 231-1108

The following counties are served by the San Diego office: Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, Imperial, San Diego.


Fresno
2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4290
Fresno, CA 93721
Phone: (559) 485-7430
Fax: (559) 485-9689

The following counties are served by the Fresno office: Alpine, Amador, Calaveras, Fresno, Imperial, Inyo, Kern, Kings, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Mono, San Joaquin, San Luis Obispo, Stanislaus, Tulare, Tuolumne.

http://feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactUs.StateOffices

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
35. I, for one, welcome our new Corporatist Blue Dog overlords!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC