Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A way to tweak Geithner's Toxic Asset Plan from Harvard Law Prof Bebchuk... What do you think?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 03:19 PM
Original message
Poll question: A way to tweak Geithner's Toxic Asset Plan from Harvard Law Prof Bebchuk... What do you think?
Prof. Bebchuk has been pushing for a government-sponsored sale of toxic assets to private funds, but he proposes the following as a way of making the risk/payoff more fair for taxpayers:

Basically, let the market decide the ratio of private investment to private share in the upside. (Geithner's plan allows the FDIC to determine this to some degree, where they have analysts set a debt to equity ratio up to 6:1.) Lebchuk proposes that the potential buyers should indicate what percent of the auction price they're willing to pay for what share of the upside later. Then auction the asset pool.

Here's the article on his Harvard blog, from March 31st.
http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2009/03/31/a-fix-for-geithner/

"....Treasury officials believe that because private parties have not thus far established funds dedicated to buying troubled assets, favorable terms are needed to induce their participation. This logic is reasonable, but it is important to keep the government subsidy at a minimum. Without any market check, the terms set by the government could substantially overshoot what is necessary to induce private participation and end up imposing large and unnecessary costs on taxpayers.

A program of public-private funds should be designed to minimize costs to taxpayers. To attain this objective, the government should base the terms of participation on a process in which private managers compete to be in the program...."



There are more links in the article if you're interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Polls are fun
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Please vote, I'm bribing you with an unreleased photo from the G20 Summit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Nice photoshop work.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. Can you put a choice: I still don't know what the hell is going on or what the PPIP stands for? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Aww, sorry, no can edit anymore. However, if you're interested,
this article might explain it better for you.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aEDHFtFqc_ko&refer=home
PPIP= Public Private Investment Program
There are similarities between the PPIP and the Resolution Trust Corp which helped resolve the Savings and Loan crisis.
The article points to recent (as in, last two weeks) improvements in the market for commercial mortgage bonds and mortgage backed securities, suggesting that investors are responding appropriately to the PPIP:

"Top-rated commercial-mortgage bonds rose 5.6 percent since March 20 to about 79 cents on the dollar on average, according to Merrill Lynch & Co. indexes. The most-senior class of benchmark 2005 securities backed by fixed-rate Alt-A home loans, or those ranked between prime and subprime, increased about 12 percent to 54 cents as of March 31, according to Deutsche Bank AG."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC