Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why are Senate Republicans so threatened by the release of torture memos?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 01:09 PM
Original message
Why are Senate Republicans so threatened by the release of torture memos?
Edited on Mon Apr-06-09 01:49 PM by ProSense
Monday, April 06, 2009

Holding Koh and Johnsen Hostage to a Cover Up of Torture

JB

Over at the Daily Beast Scott Horton tells us that behind the fierce Republican opposition to the the Koh and Johnsen nominations is a desire to prevent the Obama Administration from revealing key torture memos.

Senate Republicans are now privately threatening to derail the confirmation of key Obama administration nominees for top legal positions by linking the votes to suppressing critical torture memos from the Bush era. A reliable Justice Department source advises me that Senate Republicans are planning to “go nuclear” over the nominations of Dawn Johnsen as chief of the Office of Legal Counsel in the Department of Justice and Yale Law School Dean Harold Koh as State Department legal counsel if the torture documents are made public. The source says these threats are the principal reason for the Obama administration’s abrupt pullback last week from a commitment to release some of the documents. A Republican Senate source confirms the strategy. It now appears that Republicans are seeking an Obama commitment to safeguard the Bush administration’s darkest secrets in exchange for letting these nominations go forward.

The interesting question is why Republican senators are so deeply threatened by the additional confirmation that the United States engaged in torture. It cannot be diplomatic embarrassment about the names of the countries that cooperated; these can be redacted. It cannot be the revelation of particular techniques; these have been thoroughly vetted in the press in the past several years.

The real resistance, it appears, is to the public disclosure of an official government document approving specific techniques that amount to torture. This degree of specificity and the government's request for approval of specific techniques does not appear in the original torture memos already released to the public. It is one thing to read a memo reading the torture statute ridiculously narrowly; it is another to read a memo stating that the OLC has been asked whether techniques X, Y, and Z violate the criminal law and reaching the conclusion that the law permits them or else the law is unconstitutional. Reading such memos brings us much closer to a specific government order to engage in torture.

Perhaps Senate Republicans and their allies they fear that, if such documents ever came to light, pressure for public investigations-- including a truth commission-- and even the appointment of a non-partisan special prosecutor to investigate possible criminal prosecutions would become inevitable.

Who would be implicated in these investigations is an interesting question. I doubt that it would solely be limited to Republican politicians. Many important and influential people would no doubt be discomfited by the launching of an investigation that actually named names.

<...>

One thing is clear. Astute politicians must have judged that the disclosure of these torture memos may significantly change the stakes of politics. They fear that these memos will have a powerful effect on public opinion.

That, however, is another reason not to give into this form of political blackmail against Koh and Johnsen and release the memos immediately. Once these documents are released, it will be harder to keep out of government people who have condemned torture and illegality for a very long time.






Edited title to add s to Republican.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hate these criminals. There day is coming, they can fight it all
they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. The reason, of course, it that is makes Bush (and the GOP by extension)
to be charged with war crimes.

:headbang:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because when Junior declared "We Don't Torture," that was good enough for them.
They don't need no stinkin' proof to the contrary mucking up their delusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Congressional Republicans relesed Clinton's taped grand jury testimony in 1998.
Looks like they're not such big fans of public disclosure anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's called complicity...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Because they KNEW and did NOTHING to stop it...
...they are just as complicit as the ringleaders..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-07-09 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. Best question of the month. I think the answer is "everything"
I think the torture memos will be the thread that begins unraveling an entire cloth of lies that created a fake consensus reality.

Once that thread begins to unravel, we'll have a clear view of what happened on 9/11; the global scope of torture, assassinations and black site prisons; how the NSA was used for political purposes, such as blackmail; the system by which the Republican party was financed through kickbacks from bogus defense and other contractors; the real scope of the Abrahmoff scandal; collusion between the Republicans and the corporate media; how the elections were rigged; and on and on.

They will fight vehemently to prevent any single thread from unraveling, because they don't want the whole thing to unravel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-07-09 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. Because they stand to lose more from revelation than do Senate Democrats.
Therefore, they work harder than do their Democratic counterparts to keep this info secret.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC