|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 01:30 PM Original message |
Job Approval Ratings for First-Year Presidents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
1. Why are Obama's numbers being compared to slightly later periods |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Median Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 02:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. Interesting That They Chose The Lowest Three Day Period For Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 04:44 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Interesting but the number STILL looks good versus the more recent Presidents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cali_Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
2. He's a black guy named Barack Hussein Obama and a Dem to boot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 01:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Republicans are just upset. Note that Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cali_Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 01:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. I have a feeling I know what the media spin will be... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 02:04 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Chart tells me that 'Obama has the highest support from his own party in the modern era'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MidwestTransplant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 01:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. The more successful he is the lower his Republican support will be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orwell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
4. Interesting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sanity Claws (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
7. The R v. D differential |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
8. Somewhat misleading |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
9. The gap is large because of his HIGH support among his own party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
12. Study |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PolNewf (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
13. Republican party ID is down, mostly the hardcore remain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
14. How bizarre that Carter's is the highest total n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 04:25 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Carter's High Support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
16. Not very meaningful since Carter had the highest going back to Nixon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cooolandrew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-06-09 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
18. It's the totals that count and more folks define themselves Democratic than ever before.> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC