Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is Somalia still even called a "country"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 11:07 AM
Original message
Why is Somalia still even called a "country"?
Edited on Wed Apr-08-09 11:24 AM by SoCalDem
Apparently it's not had a real government for quite some time. It seems to be a lawless strip of coastline , run by bandits, pirates & ne'er-do-wells.

I'm surprised that one of its neighbors (landlocked ones particularly) have not just swooped in and claimed it as its own "new" territory.

Perched, as it is, along such valuable shipping channels, it seems as if something must be done soon, before someone goes crazy and creates an ecological nightmare, by sinking an oil tanker..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Because the UN doesn't recognize the term "clusterfuck"
Which is far closer to the truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Pretty much. What else are you going to call it?
There's no good word for "territory with an extraordinarily weak internationally-recognized government that exerts only pathetically limited control over any part of that territory, and with several moderately stable breakaway governments, none of which are recognized."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Somali's neighbors haven't taken over Somalia because it's ungovernable.
Edited on Wed Apr-08-09 11:16 AM by Occam Bandage
If neither the UN (with strong American backing) nor the African Union (including an Ethiopian invasion) have been able to impose any degree of order despite two decades of trying, what hope would Kenya or Ethiopia have to annex it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. lawless, run by bandits, pirates, & ne're do wells you say?
Sounds like America just last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. Um, it has been invaded. By Ethiopia. With U.S. blessing and military strikes.
Generally, it's done nothing to stabilize the country and made matters worse. Turning fisherman into pirates, for instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. If the UN doesn't grow a fucking spine and do something about this
The the vacuum will be filled an the biggest, baddest, most oppressive Warlord on the block after they are done duking it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. You think Dick Cheney would really want Somalia? /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Only if they build him a bunker and a canned hunt ranch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. I wish we could send him there. From the description of that place, it would be perfect.
He would have to deal with marauding warlords, privation, starvation, fear and real suffering. He wouldn't last long. somehow I like the karma of that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
8. "The piece of land formerly known as Somalia" is too long to type...
....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. Because, ironically, Somalia has one of the strongest national identities in the region
If you mean by "country," "nation state," keep in mind that there are two parts of that -- the nation or nationality (or ethnic group) and the government.

Somalia no longer has a government.

But there is still a very strong concept of Somali people. Over 90% of the people of Somalia are Somalis. By comparison, most of the other countries in the region -- Ethiopia, Kenya, for example -- are jumbles of many ethnic groups.

There is also, sadly, a very strong concept of clan that divides the Somali people into armed factions.

The irony is that the Somali identity is so strong, that when any outsiders try to go in to "help" the Somalis become unified in kicking their asses.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. Semantics (I'm just being persnickety here)
You are conflating the terms government (or state) with country (or nation). While Somalia is a failed state with no central government, it is still a country in which the people have a more unified cultural heritage than most African "countries."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. There are at least 2 stable functioning governments in the old Somalia.
And arguably 4.

There are many reasons why the outside world won't officially recognize them, but they are there, and we currently do business with them.

Being called a country, and being a country, are two very different things.
Just ask Taiwan.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. It is already an ecological nightmare.. Western countries
Edited on Wed Apr-08-09 01:39 PM by walldude
are dumping toxic waste on their shores and have been for years. With no legitimate government there is no way to stop them, short of.. um.. pirating their ships.

Links in case you think I'm full of shit:

http://blackstarnews.com/?c=135&a=5163

http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=84b309cb375a71013072e8158b583353

http://chamachamwananchi.wordpress.com/2009/01/19/radio-active-waste-dumped-in-somalia/

there are plenty more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I'm fully aware about why they feel justified in doing what they are doing, BUT
the pirates have been paid a shitload of money and are currently holding a bunch more ships..

How much money is enough?

apparently no amount is enough..

Perhaps getting themselves together governmentally and fighting back that way might be a safer thing for everyone..

Anytime someone lashes out, there are underlying "reasons", but these guys are playing with fire, and many people will end up suffering when some country says enough..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC