Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's the problem with paying more taxes for single payer?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 05:15 AM
Original message
What's the problem with paying more taxes for single payer?
How stupid do you have to be to prefer a $400 premium to a $100 tax? If it makes Obama feel better, why not just call the tax a premium?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's an ingrained buzzword
People have been trained to hear the word "tax" and they flip out about it. I always wondered why people think it's a good idea to vote Republican when they mostly cut taxes for the very rich and then the cost of health care, education, food, gas, etc etc etc goes up. They get maybe a few hundred bucks back in taxes but lose thousands everywhere else. That word alone has been cultivated to get a reaction, so yeah, maybe premium would work better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. they're learning very quickly around here in WNY. erie county in buffalo
is finding out as they complain about woodlawn beach being closed because they would have to pay a lifeguard. all the parks and beaches that are not going to be available for people to use this summer is making some folks upset. these are the same people that complain about the taxes. now, i complain about some taxes. but at least I don't think that all this stuff that we seem to take for granted around here is all free. Do I think it's a good idea to close all the recreation places?? no. it's biting yourself in the ass because people will go to the beach, and maybe get lunch at a local restaurant or ice cream or something. people will go somewhere where they CAN go to the beach and that place will get the revenue and economic boost. but i digress. I don't think people actually realize just exactly what their tax dollars go towards. they only hear what the politicians tell them and the radio mouth pieces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. nothing. I doubt it will cost more than my premiums do now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. but at $100, it's SOCIALISM!! at $400 it's free market!! just
don't get sick and don't lose your job and you're all good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Yeah and who are they listening to? Of course, the insurance companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. There isn't one. Only people who think that's a problem are the insurance companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
7.  $100 a year for health care - isn't it more like a 15-20% increase in payroll taxes?
For benefits for employees I pay 35% on top of the base salary - most of that is for health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. No, $100 a month
Actually, at my Washington Health Security Trust meeting today, they've raised that to $125. The $!00 figure was what we came up with in 1999. My current COBRA is $450 a month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's different for everyone
In essence, you are right, it would cost the vast majority of us less/same either way. The real problem is that we all pay for our healthcare in so many different ways that any plan you put forward will look "risky" for some group of people.

The devil really is in the details here too. For all those folks who pay through/with their employers, one needs to figure out how to get the company to continue to make their contribution. There is legitimate concern that employers will just stop paying anything, not increase your wages, and pocket the savings as profit. This is even more true for folks who still have some medical coverage through a retirement plan (a shrinking portion of the population for sure). And there will always be the story that someones copay goes up, or a treatment becomes more expensive, or they can't use Doctor A, or whatever.

So in the end, we are stuck trying to write legislation that says, "everything will stay the same, you'll just pay for it differently".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Single payer proposals include a direct payroll assessment on employers
For those providing insurance now, they spend 14% of payroll, and the single payer assessment would be 8% or so. (Less for small businesses) The individual assessment would be in addition to that. All told, it would still wind up to be less that all the money we are paying as individuals and employers now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. We pay taxes now and do not get much for it. I would pay more to actually have something to show for
our money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. How much more would you be willing to pay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Enough to get something substantial in return.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC