Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: An Impressive First Nominee (On Obama's first judicial selection - Judge David Hamilton)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 08:28 PM
Original message
NYT: An Impressive First Nominee (On Obama's first judicial selection - Judge David Hamilton)
President Obama has done well with his first judicial nomination — David Hamilton, a well-respected federal district court judge in Indiana — for the Chicago-based United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. After eight years of Bush nominees, many of whom had thin credentials and far-right ideological agendas, the selection of Judge Hamilton is good news indeed. The Senate should confirm him quickly.

Judge Hamilton has a long and distinguished record as a lawyer in private practice and as a jurist. His rulings appear to be guided by an honest belief in applying the law fairly and in providing a fair hearing to victims of injustice. That is no small point these days.

Conservative judges have been on a campaign to close the courthouse door to plaintiffs through the overly aggressive use of a variety of legal doctrines. Among them is “pre-emption,” which holds that federal law sometimes invalidates the state laws under which people often sue. Last year, Judge Hamilton delivered a well-reasoned rejection of a major drug company’s claim that a wrongful-death lawsuit was pre-empted by federal law.

Judge Hamilton has also stood up for little-guy plaintiffs when the law is on their side. Last year, he ruled in favor of an employee of an assisted-living center who claimed that she was fired after she refused to hide documents from state investigators. Although, like most employees, she could normally be fired without cause, Judge Hamilton ruled that her refusal to interfere with a health investigation put her in a protected category.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/15/opinion/15wed3.html?_r=1


Senators, confirm this nominee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is Good!
More important than a ratty ol teabagger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. We got to keep our eyes on the ball
Edited on Wed Apr-15-09 09:01 PM by usregimechange
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Excellent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Judges is what's it's all about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. K& (5th) R! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. This part is so important!
And it will be well done! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. I've been dying for law-abiding judges to replace the Bush agents of corruption.
This is news I can celebrate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
8. Thanks
Good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Intelligent, experienced, impartial, believes in the law ...
How will this country ever survive with people like this on the bench? :sarcasm:


Nice pick, Mr. President! :applause:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC