Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Source: NSA Wiretap Recorded Rep. Harman (D-CA) who was promising to intervene for AIPAC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 12:22 AM
Original message
Source: NSA Wiretap Recorded Rep. Harman (D-CA) who was promising to intervene for AIPAC
April 19, 2009 – 8:49 p.m.
Sources: Wiretap Recorded Rep. Harman Promising to Intervene for AIPAC
By Jeff Stein, CQ SpyTalk Columnist

Rep. Jane Harman , the California Democrat with a longtime involvement in intelligence issues, was overheard on an NSA wiretap telling a suspected Israeli agent that she would lobby the Justice Department reduce espionage-related charges against two officials of the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee, the most powerful pro-Israel organization in Washington.

Harman was recorded saying she would “waddle into” the AIPAC case “if you think it’ll make a difference,” according to two former senior national security officials familiar with the NSA transcript.

In exchange for Harman’s help, the sources said, the suspected Israeli agent pledged to help lobby Nancy Pelosi , D-Calif., then-House minority leader, to appoint Harman chair of the Intelligence Committee after the 2006 elections, which the Democrats were heavily favored to win.

Seemingly wary of what she had just agreed to, according to an official who read the NSA transcript, Harman hung up after saying, “This conversation doesn’t exist.”

Harman declined to discuss the wiretap allegations, instead issuing an angry denial through a spokesman.

“These claims are an outrageous and recycled canard, and have no basis in fact,” Harman said in a prepared statement. “I never engaged in any such activity. Those who are peddling these false accusations should be ashamed of themselves.”

It’s true that allegations of pro-Israel lobbyists trying to help Harman get the chairmanship of the intelligence panel by lobbying and raising money for Pelosi aren’t new.

They were widely reported in 2006, along with allegations that the FBI launched an investigation of Harman that was eventually dropped for a “lack of evidence.”

What is new is that Harman is said to have been picked up on a court-approved NSA tap directed at alleged Israel covert action operations in Washington.

And that, contrary to reports that the Harman investigation was dropped for “lack of evidence,” it was Alberto R. Gonzales, President Bush’s top counsel and then attorney general, who intervened to stop the Harman probe.

Why? Because, according to three top former national security officials, Gonzales wanted Harman to be able to help defend the administration’s warrantless wiretapping program, which was about break in The New York Times and engulf the White House.

As for there being “no evidence” to support the FBI probe, a source with first-hand knowledge of the wiretaps called that “bull****.”

Continue Reading: http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docid=hsnews-000003098436
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. We always assumed Bush was blackmailing Congress...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh my
This could be interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. +1 !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yikes!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. Court aproved= FISA warrant
ooops

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
islandgirl808 Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. well i'll be damned
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. Good thing Pelosi wasn't willing to play ball
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
8. Dawg (I'm a pootie fan by the way)
this shit is getting serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. Wowee wow wow, i.e.:
"Wow".

Oh, what a tangled we they weaved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
10. "according to two former senior national security officials familiar with the NSA transcript"


So this is payback for releasing the torture docs.

Well, fine by me if it blows back on that creep, Harman.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Another VERY interesting point you make.
Edited on Mon Apr-20-09 01:36 AM by chill_wind
Porter Goss sure wanted to nail her at the time.. "deemed the matter particularly urgent because of Harman’s rank as the panel’s top Democrat."

Fine by me too, but the timing of these details now is... pretty interesting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
11. This isn't surprising.
Edited on Mon Apr-20-09 01:19 AM by Frank Booth
What is surprising is how this sleaze-ball continues to represent the 36th district.

More from the article:

But that’s when, according to knowledgeable officials, Attorney General Gonzales intervened.

According to two officials privy to the events, Gonzales said he “needed Jane” to help support the administration’s warrantless wiretapping program, which was about to be exposed by the New York Times.

Harman, he told Goss, had helped persuade the newspaper to hold the wiretap story before, on the eve of the 2004 elections. And although it was too late to stop the Times from publishing now, she could be counted on again to help defend the program

He was right.

On Dec. 21, 2005, in the midst of a firestorm of criticism about the wiretaps, Harman issued a statement defending the operation and slamming the Times, saying, “I believe it essential to U.S. national security, and that its disclosure has damaged critical intelligence capabilities.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #11
24. Why is AIPAC interested in continuing warrantless wiretapping? Narus/Verint (wiretapping) systems?
Edited on Mon Apr-20-09 07:27 AM by leveymg
The NSA has long relied on Israeli produced wiretapping systems for much of its domestic telephone/e-mail intercepts that are gathered through CALEA-mandated diverters put in place by the phone companies beginning in the 1990s. Much of this equipment is manufactured by NARUS, VERINT, and NICE, companies founded and still operated by retired Israeli signals intelligence officers.

There may be an information-sharing arrangement with Israel similar to the Echelon program run jointly with the UK, by which everyone reads and shares each others intercepts, in order to evade laws limiting domestic wiretapping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
12. This conversation doesn't exist.
I'll remember to end all my incriminating phone conversations with that... and that way I can't be prosecuted.

:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. I've got a new signature...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 03:34 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Hehe... cheers.
I was considering doing that myself... but you beat me to it... :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
13. Is this the congressperson that they have been talking about?
The one that was tapped?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
26. No. There was a warrant for this one in DC. The other one was abroad, without a warrant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
15. .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
16. I don't like any of this. This sucks.
Fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
19. I hope some Democrats challenge her in the next Congressional elections and kicks her ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. Hopefully her coming indictment will preclude a run---time for us
to clean house and kick trash to the curb.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 05:48 AM
Response to Original message
20. anybody know when she's up for re-election? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Everybody knows
She is in the House --> every two years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
22. That explains why she left the Intel Committee, also points out a source of influence on Pelosi
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
23. Methinks they should check Feinstein some more too... She was upset Harman passed over for Panetta.
... as CIA director.

Imagine how bad a choice that would have been with these revelations. And whether Feinstein knew about them too and is also a participant in this scheme or not...

http://www.wowowow.com/post/sen-feinstein-hits-back-against-obamas-cia-pick-rep-jane-harman-passed-over-job-167674
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Methinks you are onto something there.
B-) :hi: B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. ya@!
If only we had a real free press, but then if we did they never would have even tried to this type of blatant corruption:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jewishlibrl Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
28. Greenwald is calling it "a major scandal"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC