Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats Consider Bypassing G.O.P. on Health Care Plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 04:28 PM
Original message
Democrats Consider Bypassing G.O.P. on Health Care Plan
Democrats Consider Bypassing G.O.P. on Health Care Plan
By ROBERT PEAR

WASHINGTON — With solid majorities in both houses of Congress, Democrats are tempted to use their political muscle to speed passage of health care legislation with minimal concessions to the Republican minority.

That approach may be the only way they can fulfill President Obama’s campaign promises, but it carries high risks as well.

In the budget blueprint for the coming year, Democrats may resort to an obscure procedure known as reconciliation to clear the way for Senate passage of a comprehensive health bill with a 51-vote majority, rather than the 60 votes that would otherwise be needed.

“It may be a struggle to get to 60,” said Senator Jeff Bingaman, Democrat of New Mexico, who is working on the legislation.

Use of the expedited procedure, to prevent a Senate filibuster, could both help and hurt the Democrats. It would enable them to overcome Republican objections to a big increase in federal spending and a huge expansion in the role of government. On the other hand, it could fundamentally alter the political dynamic of the health care debate, detonating an explosive reaction among Republican senators who have been working with Democrats on the issue.

If Democrats use the fast-track procedure, it would be tantamount to “a declaration of war,” said Senator Michael B. Enzi of Wyoming, the senior Republican on the health committee.

<SNIP>

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/23/us/politics/23health.html?_r=1&hp?xid=rss-page&pagewanted=print
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. This kind of war I like. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hellataz Donating Member (804 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. I say declare war, it's not like the republicans are ever going to see eye to eye with us anyway.
It's funny how they are constantly attacking the Dems and President Obama for not being willing to to "work with them" yet every chance they get they try to block the Presidents polices for no valid reason. They wont stop trying to sabotage the dems, so i say on such an important issue, we shouldn't care about upsetting the republicans since most of them don't like us anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Democrats had better be more than tempted if they expect anything of merit to get done
Edited on Wed Apr-22-09 04:35 PM by depakid
Note to Mr. Enzi (whose recent bill tried to force junk insurance- minimal coverage with high deductibles, exclusions and coinsurance requirements on people through premption of state law mandates):

YOU AND YOUR ILK DECLARED WAR LONG AGO.

I Democrats have anm ounce of sense and even a teaspoon of integrity and political fortitude they won't think twice about using this process REPEATEDLY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. "A declaration of War"?
They took out a "contract on America" in the 90's and now they accuse loyal Americans of declaring war?

Chutzpah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. There's no reason to include them when you know what their
votes will be: NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Tyranny I tell you!
The democrats could push through their radical socialist agenda with only a simple 51% majority!? That's like the DEFINITION of tyranny or something. I'm pretty sure. Sheesh, passing legislation with a majority vote? What is the world coming too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. Go for it. Repubs will just bitch, in any event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R - do it
They would obstruct no matter what we do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. LET them explode!! They'll just stank up the walls a bit but we can wipe them down and
...go on with life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. They need to do it and do it now. The party of limbaugh will not
behave anyway. Get it done Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC