Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should Obama pardon Lyndie England?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TheCoxwain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 10:29 AM
Original message
Should Obama pardon Lyndie England?
Edited on Thu Apr-23-09 10:59 AM by TheCoxwain
If CIA operatives deserve immunity so should the soldiers.


But I am not sure if President Obama has power to pardon in Military Justice cases.

Update:

The issue is not how egregious the acts by individuals CIA/Military were - The issue is that policy formulated at the top was responsible for creating the environment that allowed these acts to occur.

There is a concerted effort by the pukes to deny this reality by blaming ' a few bad apples'. They should not be allowed to get away with it.

I think Potus should pardon the low level operatives and go after the decision makers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. I agree...we're talking about the lowest level of the food chain...
...she was at the bottom of those being told what to do...if he thinks CIA operatives get off, it's hypocritical to say she shouldn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. No. I don't know about the CIA agents but I saw the pictures.
She along with her people enjoyed doing what they did. If they didn't, they wouldn't be smiling or take the pictures. I'm not into a pardon for that woman.

There are people who have to engage in the act and are disgusted but know it would be treason otherwise or are willing to risk their humanity for the job. Fine. She enjoyed it, took pictures and had a grand old time.

That takes inhumane to cohort of evil, she's right alongside Rumsfield for enjoying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCoxwain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Couple points .. what makes you thinks that none of the CIA operative did not enjoy it?
as to proof .. we have not had leaks of photos to the press - But I am sure worse things were done - especially in the prisons abroad. And a little bit of digging by the DOJ will bring that to light. Its really an open secret.


The real question however is the uniformity of standard.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. As I stated...
since I knew that you would make the above point about my understanding of the CIA agents...I said, "I don't know." I never claimed to know and O even said people who acted outside the law and did various other things would face the same probes as everyone else.

However, I saw her actions and she participated and ENJOYED it. She ENJOYED it...it's sick and that is enough to put her behind bars because to me, she wouldn't need to get clarification since for her it was FUN.

As for your statement on uniformity of standard blame Bush. Remember and please please remember, because so many people seem to forget, Obama was NOT president during that time. So the standards will be different. One has a strong level of understanding and good judgement...another was fool. And you're asking for uniformity of standard? You've got to be kidding me.

And I'm sorry, that doesn't even deserve consideration. She did what she did and loved doing it, and she paid dues. End of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think he should.
She is a stupid woman who like all other soldiers should not be able to hide behind the "I was just following orders" excuse. That said, I think she has suffered plenty and I think that a clear and loud message needs to be send to those who made this policy. The administration needs to be held accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. General Karpinski was "just following orders" too.
Yet many here seem to think she's the bee's knees. Despite the fact that she was in charge of that prison.

I'm confused by all the conflicting responses. Does Karpinski get off the "just following orders" hook because she's smart and dissed Dick Cheney and England sit in prison because she was kind of dumb and young? Both were following orders.

I'm becoming less confused, however, as to just how thorny this whole situation is. The real solution would have been to have impeached Bush/Cheney (fat chance): because in the end, the buck stopped there. It now seems very difficult to know where to draw the lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. I have always thought that Lindy England was
a scapegoat. There is no arguing that she was wrong and her actions criminal, but there is no getting away from the obvious: She was seen as a dumb hick.

It is all upside down.

This government committed war crimes and to ignore that fact is a continuing disgrace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. No, he shouldnt
she seemed to enjoy what she was doing. Besides its to early to be talking about pardons when the higher ups haven't been prosecuted yet. This is ridiculous jumping of the gun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 10:36 AM
Original message
Agreed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. no.
absolutely no fucking way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. Hayelllllll no!
No, no, no no no. What they should do is take Lyndie England's testimony, and bag every sonofabitch who backed the plan and the cover-up from her to Dick Cheney. You don't pardon a mouse caught in a rat trap, and England shouldn't be pardoned, either.

(As Commander-in-Chief, President Obama's pardon power naturally extends to courts martial. Just because he can do so doesn't mean he should.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. I don't think anyone (CIA, Military,et al, )
should be pardoned; however, I don't believe there should be different rules for the military versus the CIA. Justice should be equal, not selective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bad Thoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
9. Beyond the "Four corners" of the DOJ's interpretation
I think the type of abuse at Abu Ghraib was beyond that--it was humiliation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Exactly...it would fall under that and that's what I saw.
So even O made statements in that regard very clearly. These people added humiliation to torture and liked doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. He should pardon himself.
But only if he bumps into her.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Hah! This is not a funny topic, but your statement was. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
13. no. -- why do we keep asking this?
soldiers know that hese 'orders' -- IF they were given to her -- are illegal.

sadism is sadism and should be punished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
16. Not now, but I do think she should sue BushCo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
17. Just have Rumsfeld serve out her sentence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
19. No way
Not yet.

Once its established as fact that higher ranking officers were guilty, that's fine. But the first legal action should not be a pardon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brother Buzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
20. No, but I have no objection if he chose to pardoned John Walker Lynn
Edited on Thu Apr-23-09 11:41 AM by Brother Buzz
Of topic I know, but I always reflect on the John Walker Lynn affair, and am reminded he was interrogated by the CIA boys. Locked in shipping containers and interrogated.... I believe he could she some light on what was really happening back in the early days of the wars, before rendition and wholesale torture was employed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
21. No way. Not even close to agreeing with that one. Go after them all, top to bottom.
Edited on Thu Apr-23-09 12:55 PM by Forkboy
You don't let one scumbag go just because you can't get the other scumbags. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ebbie15644 Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
22. Maybe commuted?
I have a hard time with convicting a poor, uneducated grunt in the service, when NO ONE in the Bush regime has been held accountable. Nowl if we are holding everyone accountable, then fine lock the Lindie Englands up but they sould be the last ones locked up and not the first ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
23. No.
I would rather use her conviction as yet another reason why the prosecution of those at the top are needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
24. NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
25. Nope. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC