Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Former Bush Official Zelikow Decries Bush Interrogation Techniques (ABCNEWS)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 05:48 PM
Original message
Former Bush Official Zelikow Decries Bush Interrogation Techniques (ABCNEWS)
Former Bush Official Zelikow Decries Bush Interrogation Techniques
April 23, 2009 6:11 PM

For this week's ABC News Shuffle Podcast we interviewed former Bush State Department official Philip Zelikow.

You can listen to the Podcast on iTunes or by clicking HERE.

Zelikow, former counselor at the State Department under Secretary Condoleezza Rice, recently wrote a piece for Foreign Policy in which he discussed the memo he wrote in May 2005 after hearing of the memos coming from the Justice Department coming up with legal justifications for harsh interrogation techniques for detainees, the so-called Office of Legal Counsel "torture memos."

"I felt obliged to put an alternative view in front of my colleagues at other agencies, warning them that other lawyers (and judges) might find the OLC views unsustainable," Zelikow writes. "My colleagues were entitled to ignore my views. They did more than that: The White House attempted to collect and destroy all copies of my memo."

Zelikow asserts that the "underlying absurdity of the (Bush) administration's position can be summarized this way. Once you get to a substantive compliance analysis for "cruel, inhuman, and degrading" you get the position that the substantive standard is the same as it is in analogous U.S. constitutional law. ... In other words, Americans in any town of this country could constitutionally be hung from the ceiling naked, sleep deprived, water-boarded, and all the rest -- if the alleged national security justification was compelling. I did not believe our federal courts could reasonably be expected to agree with such a reading of the Constitution."

Zelikow told us that from his work as executive director of the 9/11 Commission, "I know what these guys (in al Qaeda) did -- at least some of them -- and I've no sympathy for them. But this is not about who they are. This is an issue about who we are, and what we are willing to do cruelly, deliberately over time to other human beings raises certain moral issues for us that I think are important for people to consider. You know, we've been in very tough wars before in the United States, but we'd never adopted an interrogation program like this, even for high value captives like the Nazis, the Japanese or other very important captives."

He wondered: "Did folks really think Americans would never learn what we were doing in this program? That they'd think that it was going to stay a secret forever? ... My conclusion then is it was inevitable that the American people were going to learn about this stuff. And when you dig a really deep hole, you ought to think a little bit about whether you have a ladder to climb out of it."

<SNIP>

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/04/former-bush-off.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. No one who followed the 9/11 Commission hearings/report
believes anything this a-hole has to say.

His only purpose - CYA CYA CYA CYA CYA CYA...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC