Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"W.H. backs reconciliation for health-care reform"(why Obama met with Congressional Leadership)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 09:48 PM
Original message
"W.H. backs reconciliation for health-care reform"(why Obama met with Congressional Leadership)
Edited on Thu Apr-23-09 09:50 PM by Pirate Smile
W.H. backs reconciliation for health-care reform

Prodded by the White House, Democrats worked into the night Thursday trying to reach agreement on a budget plan that could be adopted by next Wednesday so as to fall within President Barack Obama's first 100 days.


Top White House staff came to the Capitol for the talks, and despite some Senate resistance, one participant said that the chances were “fairly good” that Obama will get the procedural language to help expedite action on health-care legislation later this year. The process, known as reconciliation, would bypass a potential filibuster, and allow the legislation to pass with a simple majority.

At a meeting with congressional leaders at the White House, the president made clear that he would like this option preserved in the final agreement, according to persons familiar with the discussions.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) thanked Obama for “his candor” but warned that the decision could hurt the ability of the Senate to work in a bipartisan way. And even Thursday night, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D., Mont.), who will begin marking up a healthcare bill in June, said the White House-backed strategy would be counter-productive.

“It makes it a lot harder. I told Rahm that today,” Baucus told POLITICO speaking of White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel who is part of the final talks together with White House Budget Director Peter Orszag.

-snip-
One key player, who would have to give his blessing, is Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D., N.D.). He has thus far opposed using the budget procedures, as the White House wants, to expedite action on healthcare reform. And one question is what concessions he may demand in return for delivering the plan as requested by the president.
One option would be for Obama to move closer to Conrad on the issue of creating a new commission to address long term savings in government entitlement programs—something Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Cal.) has opposed in the past. But there was no evidence Thursday night that that was yet part of the final deal.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0409/21660.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Junior and his GOP lapdog Congress used reconciliation to pass their tax cuts.
Now they need to just STFU. Sucks to be them. Elections have consequences, ya know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. McConnell needs to STFU-they wouldn't know bipartisan if it
bit them in the ass. Get it done without them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. We simply have to get some of the Democrats in the Senate out of there
Edited on Thu Apr-23-09 10:07 PM by Thrill
All the times the Republicans used Reconciliation. The Dems are to wimpy to do it with something as important as Healthcare. First Conrad and now Baucus bitching about using it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Forewarned is fair-warned. More than they deserve. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm tired of the narrative that 60 votes are needed to pass anything
And I'm sick of Dems not fighting back against that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Keep in mind that Harry Reid is still Senate Majority leader. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 04:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. "hurt the ability of the Senate to work in a bipartisan way."??? Oh give me strength. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Bipartisanship will never work when one side always says "no."
They need to just get on with it and leave the Grand No Party behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brianna69 Donating Member (339 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. Wimpy dems like Conrad need to shut up
and put reconcilation in place. Why some democrats are still sucking up to repugs is beyond me. Repugs have no interest in helping dems in anyway shape or form. The aim is to pass healhcare. If it must be done by reconciliation so be it. Screw this trying to play nice to get repug votes. Just get healthcare passed this year, with or without them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. Good. Looks like it will happen.
TNR has a piece on "reconciliation" for healthcare. http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_treatment/archive/2009/04/23/reconciliation-this-changes-everything.aspx

The repug congresscretins will whine, bitch, and moan no matter what. Seems they have set a super-majority requirement for every single Obama-Dem initiative. So fuckem! Hardball time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. Good! We've had enough obstructionism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeOverFear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. Halleluiah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC