Senator Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican, said the reconciliation plan would cause a "tremendous furor" among his colleagues and virtually ensure most oppose any health care legislation.
"The partisan side of me says: Go for it, because if they do that, they’re going to get hung with the worst health care bill in history," Hatch said. "With all the complexities of health care, you cannot please all of the stakeholders and if they make it a partisan exercise, my gosh, we’ll beat them up for the rest of their lives."
And of course the yella belly Dems way in
Not all Democrats support the move. Senator Max Baucus, a Montana Democrat who heads the Senate Finance Committee, said today that "sustainable" change in the health-care system requires bipartisan support, which is less likely if lawmakers use the tactic. Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad , a North Dakota Democrat, has also criticized the plan, saying the reconciliation procedure is supposed to be reserved for legislation aimed at cutting the budget deficit.
Byrd Rule
The reconciliation plan could present some practical difficulties for Democrats when the Senate takes up the health- care legislation because of the chamber's so-called Byrd rule. The rule, named after West Virginia Democratic Senator Robert Byrd, bars provisions in bills that don't have a significant impact on taxes or spending. Republicans could use that rule to strip scores of individual provisions from health-care legislation, leaving Democrats with an incomplete bill.
"When you’re trying to write substantive legislation under those rules, you’re going to be left with what the parliamentarian has called Swiss cheese," Conrad warned yesterday.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20090424/pl_bloomberg/aoy0mteak53cLOL