Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oh, No!"Lobbyists March on the WH-Angry at the Obama administration’s restrictions on their access"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 11:06 PM
Original message
Oh, No!"Lobbyists March on the WH-Angry at the Obama administration’s restrictions on their access"
Lobbyists March on the White House

By David D. Kirkpatrick

Angry at the Obama administration’s restrictions on their access, Washington lobbyists took their complaints to the White House Friday, telling the White House ethics chief that the rules were a violation of freedom of speech.

The subject of the lobbyists’ complaints was a March 20 White House memorandum barring any administration officials from meeting with registered lobbyists about the stimulus program. The administration’s goal was to dispel any suspicions that special interests were working behind the scenes to influence the $700 billion spending plan.

But in the meeting Friday, representatives of the American Civil Liberties Union, the American League of Lobbyists and the liberal watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington told the ethics chief Norman Eisen that the rules unfairly singled out those who happen to be registered to lobby.

The rules do nothing to prevent self-interested car salesmen, bankers, electric utilities or labor unions from meeting with administration officials. Instead, the rules shut out only the professionals whose job is representing others in public policy debates.
Lobbyists “must legally report every contact they make with government officials while those not registered as lobbyists can do as they please,” Dave Wenhold, president of the American League of Lobbyists said in a statement. “You are banning the one group that is required to be transparent.”

Many lobbyists have also been complaining lately that the Obama administration’s so-called “revolving-door” rules exclude them from top appointments, too. Many contend that the White House is shutting out many of those with the most relevant policy expertise. Lobbyists for nonprofit or human-rights groups say they are being hit with a ban that was meant to exclude corporate interests, not do-gooders.

The Obama administration officials note that the president was fulfilling a campaign promise, which was to limit the influence of lobbyists in order to help restore faith in government.
As for the lobbyist hiring ban, Mr. Obama said during the campaign that he would issues waivers in cases of a special public interest, which the administration has done three times.
No word yet on any response to the latest complaints about the free speech issues.

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/24/lobbyists-march-on-the-white-house/


I'm kind of ambivalent on this issue at this point but the headline and lede aren't exactly the kind of thing politicians hate to have written about them which makes it somewhat amusing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. hmmm how is the right wing going to try to make this negative for the Prez?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hahahaha! oooh, scary.
The down side is that the lobbyists for the right reasons don't have access.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I agree. It is too bad they aren't known by a different term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. I thought this was an Onion piece......
and this is damaging to President Obama how? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I don't think it is damaging so I'm not sure why they ran it other then the NYT are
trying to get an exclusive of Obama and his cabinet playing basketball or pics of Obama in the Oval Office with Bo peaking out through John-John's little door. :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. I thought they said Obama was bluffing,
thats what one of them said on a debate on C-span can't remember when though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. Since when is a government job a "right"?
Many contend that the White House is shutting out many of those with the most relevant policy expertise

Really? They should back it up. Prove that lobbyists are the ones with the MOST "relevant policy expertise."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. Marched? I want to see pictures.
I bet their "march" was from wherever their limo dropped them off all the way to the door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
9. Doing what he said he'd do. Check...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. Aw, now that's a damn shame...
Those poor, poor lobbyists.

LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't think Obama could have dreamed up a better scenario than
being protested by lobbyists!! Love it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC