Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

REPORT: Only 13% of FauxNews coverage of Obama has been favorable.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 04:14 PM
Original message
REPORT: Only 13% of FauxNews coverage of Obama has been favorable.
Edited on Mon Apr-27-09 04:15 PM by jefferson_dem
The nonpartisan research group Center for Media and Public Affairs along with California's Chapman University released a study that found the nightly newscasts devoted 27 hours, 44 minutes to Pres. Obama's presidency in his first 50 days. That compares to 7 hours, 42 minutes for Pres. George W. Bush and 15 hours, 2 minutes for Pres. Bill Clinton during the first 50 days of their first terms.

<SNIP>

The first half hour of Fox News' "Special Report with Bret Baier," which the study says most closely resembles the network evening newscasts, devoted 10 hours 24 minutes to the Obama administration, nearly as much airtime as CBS gave him.

But Fox News stands apart from its competitors here - only 13% of comments* were considered favorable. On ABC, 57% of the comments were favorable, compared to 58% for CBS and 61% for NBC.

*The figures are based on comments made by reporters and sources not affiliated with either political party.

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/network_newsing/evening_newscasts_have_covered_obama_more_than_bush_clinton_combined_115055.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. It looks like CBS is probably the least biased network.
FOX is a joke. FOX is more negative than NBC is positive. How the fuck does that work out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClusterFreak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. That number sounds a little high, doesn't it?
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. So faux is lying their
propagandistic asses off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. I wonder if Obama gets a lot of news coverage, because he always makes sure
that he is out front in the media's eye?

They shouldn't compare his coverage to that of Bush's in 2001.
Too many people didn't want Bush there before and after the Supreme Court Decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. I bet the numbers were flipped for Fox under Bush.
and both sets are inversely proportional to the favorability rates for each President with the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I completely love your avatar!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Really? It thought that it was actually nonexistent..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Give me a break 13% positive from
Faux. What did they say that President Obama doesn't beat his wife and kick the dog anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. This video says it all about Faux
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. 13% is way too high for faux.
Someone is going to be fired over this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. (GMTA) Heads will roll for letting Obama get that much positive coverage.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. Wonder how much of that 13% was my 6 minute segment on Neil Cavuto, LOL
That was probably half of the 13%. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. HOLY CRAP, for fox that is a hard turn to the LEFT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. Check this out from their website:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC