Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Specter's Switch Affect Norm Coleman's Position on the MN Election?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:47 AM
Original message
Will Specter's Switch Affect Norm Coleman's Position on the MN Election?
I ask because it seems to me he was partially obstructing the election results to keep the Dems from getting their 60 seats in the Senate. Now that Specter has switched and the Dems have their 60, will he fight harder or give up and let Franken be seated?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Franken makes 60....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Okay, thanks for clearing that up! I made a mistake in my math! lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. the dems would only have had 59. we need franken for 60
therefore, the obstruction will only increase, if anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dubeskin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Agreed. Coleman only has more of an incentive now
to keep it up - but on the other hand, by continuing this charade he's making his Party look more desperate. It's a two-way street. And on top of it all, if he goes all the way, he's opening up another can of worms that was shut with Bush vs. Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
25. nope, 60% of 99 senators is 59
if Spector's agreement was simply to support cloture on party matters, that would make a big difference across the board --including seating Franken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. There will be 100 senators when Franken is seated. 50 x 2 = 100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. yeah but if his seating is filibustered, i'd rather have Specter worried about a Dem Primary
than worried about a Republican primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #25
37. it's not "60%" that matters in the senate. it's sixty votes.
Edited on Tue Apr-28-09 08:18 PM by enki23
it used to be 66.66666666% (ie. 67 votes), but they changed that rule in the seventies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Now more than ever the republicans will prolong Franken from taking his seat, the republicans can
Edited on Tue Apr-28-09 11:53 AM by GreenTea
draw this out, drag their feet (and it's to the republicans benefit & they can) for a long time and the republican lawyers will time it, for the longest possible wait when submitting their bullshit case to the republican leaning US Supreme Court!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think it will make Coleman dig his heels in deeper, and he'll have
a lot of GOP support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. And, it will be more obvious why
he's doing it. Not because he won but because he can't handle losing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. It's just another form of GOP obstruction. Now, they are truly desperate. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Rabid cornered Rats are
never a pretty sight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
State the Obvious Donating Member (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. The GOP deserves its title: (G)rand (O)bstructionist (P)arty nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. Whatever the Number is..this Switch is not good PR for
the repukes..especially on the heels of the Democrat, Scott Murphy, winning in the republicon District # 20 in New York from a more well known candidate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Oh I agree. I think this is very bad news for the GOP.
And when they dig their heels in supporting that crackpot Coleman, their public image will slip even further. 2010 is going to be a bloodbath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Eight bad news for the REPUBLICANS, (the name they hate so much, they prefer you use "GOP")
Edited on Tue Apr-28-09 11:57 AM by GreenTea
EXAMPLE: "Democrats sue to make Rossi call himself "Republican" instead of "GOP"

OLYMPIA — The state Democratic Party filed suit Tuesday in an attempt to force Dino Rossi to list his party preference as "Republican" on the November ballot instead of "GOP Party."

Democrats say the Iraq War and low approval ratings for President Bush have left the Republican Party a damaged brand and that Rossi is trying to distance himself by using GOP as his affiliation.

Rossi is running against Democratic Gov. Christine Gregoire. He lost to Gregoire by 133 votes in the 2004 election, and polls show this race to be close as well.

Polls by Stuart Elway have suggested many people don't know that GOP and Republican mean the same thing. One recent Elway poll indicated Rossi did better among voters if he used the "GOP" label instead of "Republican."

"There's no question we were shocked by the Elway poll," state Democratic Party Chairman Dwight Pelz said, adding that an internal poll by the party had a similar finding.

"We believe the law is being broken, and we're asking the court to step in and fix it," he said.

The lawsuit, filed in King County Superior Court, names Secretary of State Sam Reed as the defendant.

State Republican Party Chairman Luke Esser questioned Elway's poll results. He also said the lawsuit is frivolous and that the party will step in to defend Rossi in court if needed.

"The idea that people don't know Dino Rossi is a Republican is just ridiculous," Esser said, noting that Gregoire's campaign and supporters have spent millions of dollars on ads making that clear.

A statement issued by Rossi's campaign called the lawsuit "an act of a desperate incumbent." Rossi has said that he's used the term GOP for years and isn't trying to confuse voters.

GOP stands for Grand Old Party, a nickname the Republicans picked up in the 1870s. The phrase is often used by the news media when referring to Republicans, but it hasn't served as an official party designation on an election ballot, until now.

The state's new top-two primary "says a candidate may list whatever party preference the candidate wishes," Reed said. "One person did Salmon Yoga Party."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I use GOP to save character space and type faster. lol
My decision went no deeper than that, truly. I've been using GOP for a long time now for that reason. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. Norm is going all the way to the United States Supreme Court
There is no way the republicans will stand down on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Do you think he'll lose on at the USSC? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I think so. On what grounds could he possibly win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Depends on how Anthony Kennedy feels that day
He's the swing vote

You have Roberts, Scalia, Alito and Thomas on the right-wing nutjob sides. They'll support Norm 100%

You have Stevens, Ginsberg, Souter and Breyer on the left which will uphold the law.

Who knows what Kennedy will do? Sometimes he supports the law and sometimes he remembers he was appointed by Ronald Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. If Kennedy falls to the right...what can Franken do then? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. What did Al Gore do
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Are you fuckin' kidding me?! All that and Coleman wins in the end?
I hope the USSC comes through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Really shitty ain't it
Edited on Tue Apr-28-09 12:37 PM by LynneSin
:shrug:

You better believe right now the republican machine is having talks with Kennedy to keep him in line with the rest of the repuke assholes on the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Shite. How does that jerk, Coleman, have a case?! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. How did Bush have a case in 2000 to end the vote count early
:shrug:

Great mysteries of life - like the Pyramids, Stonehedge and Easter Island.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Bush's vote margin over Gore (at the time of Bush v. Gore) was higher I believe
Coleman hasn't won any of the vote counts and his main argument is that there were problems with the vote counting so he'd essentially be asking SCOTUS to simply throw out the election results that I guess would have to be settled in a new election or some other remedy proposed by the court. :shrug: There is no recount to stop in his race with Franken and Franken has been determined the winner in terms of the final vote tally so I'm not really even sure what might happen. Coleman can't seriously believe that he's going to be able to go to SCOTUS and have them declare him the winner despite him not getting a majority of the votes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
12. Coleman will hold on like grim death. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Like he wasn't already..but now
his macabre greed will be more exposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
18. Yup. Its going to the US Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. What do you speculate might happen there Thrill with this case?!
I don't know. I feel this Specter thing might not make this go Franken's way even though he is in the win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I worry about it going there. The good thing is if they use Gore v Bush
Maybe they'll rule for Franken!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HelenWheels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
26. More money to Al
I just sent Al another donation to help pay for legal fees. Go Al!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
31. Coleman will dig in his heels.
Polling shows some two-thirds of Minnesotans support seating Senator Franken. Pressure meet Pawlenty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
36. just thinking the same thing...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC