Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I have to say this! I like most progressives would prefer the President to be more progressive, but

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 08:38 PM
Original message
I have to say this! I like most progressives would prefer the President to be more progressive, but
Edited on Wed Apr-29-09 08:45 PM by ej510
we have to understand; the country is not that progressive, but it is moving their slowly. Most of the country sits in the middle. If we alienate the moderates we will end up in the same place as the repukes. We have to except the conservative dems, because their constituents are not progressive. The reason we control everything is, because we accept everyone. It is better to be in the majority than in the minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just like steering a battle ship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. He said ocean liner, I think. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I think he said both, at different times. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Oh, well. You listened better than me, then. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. The country IS progressive. It voted for Obama. I never listen to
Edited on Wed Apr-29-09 08:40 PM by valerief
the bobbleheads who chant that "we're the middle" shit. I know people want help from the govt when they have to make a choice between the streets and a warm, safe bed. That's a progressive concept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. then why did they vote for Bush and more importantly...
... why aren't we talking about President Kucinich's press conference tonight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. They voted for Gore and then Kerry. The Supreme Court GAVE the
presidency to Bush. Blackwell of Ohio and Diebold handed Bush his second term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. No they didn't....
62 million people voted for Bush in 2004 and 50 million people voted for him in 2000.

I understand your point, the Republicans stole the last two elections, yada yada yada .... but they didn't steal ALL 50 million plus votes.

Nope ... a HUGE CHUNK of those 50 million plus voters were moderates ... who voted against the Democratic candidate of their own free will.

It happend before and if we rest on our laurels, it could happen again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. So says Diebold. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. And all of my hillbilly neighbors! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Ha!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
33. Who were brainwashed by the whore media and their dumbfuck preachers
...into believing that "queers gettin married" would bring about the end of civilization itself (but that Jesus was completely OK with Chimp slaughtering and pillaging Iraq and Afghanistan while his friends robbed us blind)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. because people don't vote for their beliefs
they often vote for an image. And they base that image off of what they see in a media filter or are told by certain trusted sources like friends or even local political figures etc. Plus, Kucinich isn't part of a general status quo, he fights against that, so as a result he would never ever catch on enough or raise enough money to be competitive in a presidential race. Obama has much more going for him in terms of style etc. Even people here who are more in tune with DK's philosophy than Obama's or even Hillary's supported them in a primary over him. Most people on this site have beliefs closer to DK's than Obama's but he wouldn't even win a straight up poll here against the president. That's not because DU isn't progressive, that's for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
34. It is NOT progressive. They can be progressive on SOME issues, not all.
There are people progressive on some and there are people extremely conservative on others. Many people voted on O becase they didn't want another Bush---that they saw in McCain. It's not to say the country is progressive that they voted for O. They may have supported a few ideals or have a bit of self-interest in voting for him---especially after Bush. But don't think---if you're a progressive they support your views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. ding! ding! ding!
YOU get the "Best thread of the night" award!

... no, make that "of the week!"

............ no, make that OF THE WHOLE FRICKIN MONTH!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Republicans "except" everyone. The Democrats "accept" everyone.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Come on Ragun said progress is our most important product.
He was pushing salt at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. Come on Ragun said progress is our most important product.
He was pushing salt at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. mosty of the country is pretty progressive
They just don't call themselves that. Most politicians and media members aren't progressive and that's the biggest difference. Quite a bit of it has to do with labels, including the word "progressive." Most people wouldn't even really know what the hell progressive really means in a political context but they do know what "Liberal" means and that word is a pejorative some even people who are liberal shy away from calling themselves it. Most people are fairly liberal, they just would never ever call themselves it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. If we ran Kucinich in the South he would get thumped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. *
Edited on Wed Apr-29-09 08:50 PM by Clio the Leo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. If america was as progressive as some progressives believe then Peter Defazio, would
have a bigger name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. What does that have to do with what I said?
Obama lost the South too, and your point is what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Your statement proves my point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. So you think one region is the whole country?
Edited on Wed Apr-29-09 09:20 PM by Wetzelbill
Look at polls of liberal issues. Single-payer healthcare? Most people want it. Gay Marriage? Most people are fine with it. And on and on and on.

Most voters think Obama is the most liberal member of the Senate and they still voted for him. They think he's affiliated with a radical leftist black preacher and they still voted for him. People didn't vote for Obama because they think he's Evan Bayh, they think he is more liberal or at least as liberal as Ted Kennedy.

If you look at the breakdown of voting from this election, which you obviously haven't, then you would see that the only red part of our country is a short swath along the Bible Belt. There was a map in the NY Times that put it all in color and almost all the country was Blue or Purple. The demographics growing in our country the most are people who are solidly progressive. Hispanics, in particular. And that's just the voting public. The non-voting public tends to believe in more liberal issues but they just don't really vote because they believe nobody looks out for them. But again, those groups support things like single-payer healthcare, and they certainly don't espouse the same type of things you hear from the RW or RW Dems. If it proved your point then we'd have McCain for president and Obama wouldn't have won in a blowout and the Republicans would have big majorities in Congress. As it turns out they only can win in gerrymandered districts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Ok ignore the 50 million McCain voters.
That is the most accurate poll we can look at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. last time I checked
Edited on Thu Apr-30-09 01:53 PM by Wetzelbill
50 million wasn't the whole country or most of it. And most people I know think McCain is pretty liberal. Republicans almost universally consider McCain a liberal Republican and they still voted for him. You're grasping at straws. The most accurate rundown is the state by state voting registration and there are only 7 states that are Republican, and only four of those are all that solid. Then any other polls provided on various issues you'll see that people consistently and overwhelmingly take progressive or liberal positions. But even then, people don't always vote for their beliefs. There are millions of people who believe we should have universal healthcare but they voted for Bush and McCain, for example. I know a guy who is liberal in most of his positions, but he votes Republican because he votes on image. But on policy, he would support right now if Obama put up liberal legislation on issues like healthcare. Most people believe in progressive ideas, poll after poll shows it. It's not hard to grasp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. I disagree if we roll a very progressive agenda right away Obama will a significant amount
of support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. we already did
the stimulus was the most progressive piece of legislation in decades and it didn't hurt him at all. If Obama included a public option in his health care proposal and took a more progressive position on the banks it would help him, not hurt him. If he promoted something like civil unions, at least, that would help him not hurt him. The only people it hurts him with are people who would never support him or just about any Dem anyway. And it certainly wouldn't hurt Obama to appoint a special prosecutor to look into the torture issue, although the rule of law isn't supposed to be a progressive idea. You can't lose support if almost everybody agrees with you. About the only people who would give him trouble are a nearly irrelevant minority party and the keystone cop media. But they do that anyway. How many times have you heard in the media that Obama is "doing too much"? They're going to say most of this stuff anyway. Outside of the Beltway, becoming more progressive helps me more than anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Optical.Catalyst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. Progressive policies and programs have not really been given a chance to succeed
Now is our chance. With the Republicans down to 39 Senators, and falling, we have the opportunity to pass some real progressive bills and see them through to fulfillment. When the American people are allowed to reap the benefits of what true, unrestricted progressive policies can do, they will become believers.

For a limited time, the Republicans have been side lined and we have control of the forum. It may appear that we are running rough shod over the conservatives (not that they don't deserve it) but we have to get true reform through Congress and signed into law. Nothing breeds success like success, and this is the best opportunity for success that I can ever remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
26. I agree
The country isn't ready for too many progressive changes right now. If they come slowly then no one will notice it much.

Just remember, no one thought the country was ready for a Black President or for a Woman President. Now it all seems quite normal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. We have to roll it out slowly. Hannity. Limbaugh, and the rest of hate radio
does a great job in scaring the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I'm waiting for the day gay marriage is commonplace everywhere
and the screamers realize their miserable little marriages haven't changed at all because of it. Once that happens they won't be able to use the 'gay agenda' as a wedge issue. That's progress!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
32. As FDR once said...
to activists who were impatient with him and wishing he'd act...

"I agree with you, I want to do it, now make me do it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC