Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Mastering Politics’ Game of Three-Dimensional Chess (and yes, via bipartisanship)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 10:10 PM
Original message
Obama Mastering Politics’ Game of Three-Dimensional Chess (and yes, via bipartisanship)
It's not bad, especially if it works. And it's ruining the morale of the gop. :cry:

Obama Mastering Politics’ Game of Three-Dimensional Chess
By Bob Benenson, CQ Staff


President Obama certainly has policy grounds that justify his cross-aisle nomination of New York Republican Rep. John M. McHugh to be secretary of the Army.

McHugh, whose 23rd Congressional District way upstate includes the Army’s vast Fort Drum, is now ranking Republican on the Armed Services Committee, the culmination of more than 16 years in the House focused heavily on military-related issues.

But it’s hard not to notice that this is the latest in a series of personnel moves by the White House that have strengthened the Democrats’ prospects in future elections.

Although McHugh maintained his strong popularity at home over nine House elections, his district — like most of the Northeast — has trended Democratic for president and gave 52 percent of its 2008 votes to Obama. Democratic strategists say they plan to stage a serious takeover bid in the special election that will occur later this year if McHugh, as expected, is confirmed as Army secretary.

CQ Politics senior reporter Greg Giroux notes that this would almost certainly be the fourth House special election resulting directly from an Obama administration appointment.

The other three involved seats in districts that are safely Democratic: California 32, formerly represented by Labor Secretary Hilda L. Solis; Illinois 5, the former political base of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel; and California 10, still represented by Ellen O. Tauscher , whose appointment to a high-ranking State Department post is pending and expected to be approved.

Then there’s Jon Huntsman Jr., the two-term, 49-year-old governor of Utah. Huntsman was getting some buzz as a potentially attractive candidate for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination, presumably to challenge Obama. Until May 16, that is, when Obama announced that he has nominated Huntsman to be U.S. ambassador to China. Presumably, unless the two men have a huge falling-out, this takes Huntsman out of the mix of White House politics until at least 2016.

more...

http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000003136738&cpage=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. lol dont say the "B" word....
... it SCARES folks!!! Boo!!! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No shit! I'm telling you, we ignore it at our peril.
:D

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x8455496

A Bi-Partisan Healthcare Bill Is A Death Sentence to the Public Option
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Seems like if DU is divided, it's more along the lines of governing culture
It's like on one side there are the people who want look more towards achieving all of their demands instantly by ramming home legislation with our majority, and then there are those who think more incrementally and work through bi-partisan coalitions.

That seems like the significant trend here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Except that "our majority" is limited to the letter "D" next to the names.
If the Democrats in congress can't get together on things, and there is little evidence that they can on these big issues, then we really don't have a useful majority.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I don't disagree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Oh dear, that post reminds me of, Let me see, I got it somewhere... Oh here it is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. if the economy and the job situation continues to worsen President Obama is
going to lose a lot of support. I hope things get better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. "continue to worsen"?
Edited on Sun Jun-07-09 10:32 PM by Clio the Leo
"Continue"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Everything Obama has done to this point has slowed the bleeding
Edited on Sun Jun-07-09 10:36 PM by Cant trust em
The economy isn't going to be fixed in five months.

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I hope you are right. I do want things to improve. I really worry about our country
and people suffering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. We're all worried, but we are now in more capable hands. And,
as far as hands go, we shouldn't all just throw them up in defeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Killing them softly with bipartisanship. Heh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's all
good..they have a huge impossible job and they're learning as they go..Brilliant!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. Shrewd moves in both appointments.
Huntsman has experience in Asia, and will probably do a pretty good job in China. however, I worry about the long tentacle of the repuke party getting his ear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. But that's the beauty of this...
In picking Republicans like Mr. McHugh for top jobs, the Obama administration says it is assembling a coalition government that welcomes qualified members of the opposition. It gives the White House a claim to bipartisanship despite continuing clashes with Republican Congressional leaders.

But the political benefits are an equally strong incentive. Remaining Republican colleagues become discouraged and feel further isolated in the minority. Political vacancies are created. And Republicans can be painted as being hostile to more moderate Republicans or those willing to engage the Democratic administration.

snip and more...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=8455030
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC