Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Olbermann talking about possibility that CBS was setup by the Repukes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:19 PM
Original message
Olbermann talking about possibility that CBS was setup by the Repukes
right now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dogtag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Barbara O'Brien of Mahablog was great!
Too bad she didn't have more air time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. guy from cbs says
most likely it was a lone activist and cbs just failed to investigate properly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. That guy
is a loser, I wish Keith would drop him. Craig Crawford has that disease where he just can't call a liar a liar, or call bullshit bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstateblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. Craig Crawford- What a smarmy useless talking head
Tell me one time he has brought in someting other than the convential "wisdom"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. where???
sorry, don't know who Olbermann is! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. MSNBC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. thanks!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Go Keith go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. because Dan Barlett said WH will not dispute documents
that's what causes conspiracy theory that republicans planted it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV1962 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wouldn't it be great if
another entity picks up the story and exposes the "Buckhead" connection with Rove?

And make CBS look extra foolish for not ID-ing the perps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayitAintSo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. Oh god ... you just stated my sweet dream!
surely there are SOME investigative journalists left out there ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. Nothing in Politics Happens By Accident
Either Franklin or Teddy said that - I can't recall right now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Francine Frensky Donating Member (870 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. First ? should be: How did they recognize the forgery so QUICKLY?
The forgery story started to circulate only hours after CBS aired the program.

That's only possible if they either knew IN ADVANCE that it was forgery (they were involved in a setup) or if they have the originals and haven't released them.

Either way, they're guilty.

Or maybe it was that blind squirrel catching a nut every once in a while....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. I've been trying to figure it out, but it makes no sense (m)
The first post from Harry Buckhead came just a few seconds shy of 9 p.m. PDT. Now, we know he lives outside of Atlanta, which would be EDT (3 hours difference, making it 6 p.m. when he made the post - right?)

60 Minutes doesn't air there until 8 p.m. ET/PT (according to the CBS News web site)... so, am I seeing what I think I'm seeing here? That Harry Buckhead was actually debunking the memos 2 hours prior to the start of the 60 Minutes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DieboldMustDie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. No, 9 p.m. PDT is midnight EDT.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. That, Cornfield, Is the Most Suspicious Part of the Entire Episode.
Buckhead's informed response about antique typewriters which is out of his league (according to the LA Times) was just a little bit too quick and too knowledgable.

Buckhead's freep post does not pass any smell test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. That's how we know this was a setup
And how could a forger know the confidential details about what was being said in Killian's office, about the principals involved? Only someone who had access to the original source material. And we know that the Bush people have spent years collecting and collating any and all incriminating documents concerning him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #26
38. Yep.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blurp Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #11
34. The WH didn't know they were forgeries because they're JUST TOO STUPID
It's fun to think that maybe the White House knew the docs were forged, but really, do you think they have the collective intelligence to discover that?

These docs fooled CBS. Someone claiming they had a 1972 cell phone log would have fooled this White House.

You give the WH too much credit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
36. It's not THAT implausible...
Can't you imagine typing away, sour-graping over the 60 Minutes broadcast, saying "I bet they're faked", and the minute someone comes up with something halfway plausible one of them sends Drudge a message?

It's the lack of denial from the WH that makes me suspect a plant. Normally they would have denounced something like that all day and night, but *poof* suddenly it's not about Bush, it's about CBS and Rather.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. also, from Keith's blog he says
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5660340/
Within four hours of CBS broadcasting the dubious paperwork, this man (Buckhead) was, to use the parlance of Radioactive Man, "Up and At Them!" A complete mechanical and historical breakdown of the history of the font type, the IBM Selectric typewriter, the capacity of Microsoft Windows to produce such documents, and a call to arms for all other bloggers rightly suspicious of the Killian Memos.

At about the same time, Democratic chairman Terry McAuliffe speculated on the same possibility, and even fingered Karl Rove, who has in the past been suspected of tapping his own candidate's phone, and dropping off his own candidate's debate practice tape, to make himself and his team look like injured parties.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
29. Rove tapped his OWN phone
and called investigators. Problem was, the batteries in the bug were only good for so long, so the time frame involved pointed to Rove himself as the perp. Too late for the opposing candidate, though. He lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstateblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
31. It's All Probably True- How You Gonna Prove It?
These MFs are pros at this shit and just like the lawyer in our town that committed the perfect murder, Rove and Co. plan this stuff meticulously and cover their tracks and leave no fingerprints. They are criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. It looks like something like this has been done before
I've never heard about this

If Burkett is suspect, though, so is Karl Rove. Every campaign he runs seems to have well-timed distractions. In 2000, just before his inarticulate client was to debate Al Gore, a tape of Mr. Bush’s training ended up in the Gore campaign’s mailbox. Reporters wrote about this discovery and overwhelmed issues and debate coverage with the unraveling mystery.

An employee of Mark McKinnon, Bush’s media expert, was later implicated in the scandal but nobody ever proved Rove wasn’t pulling strings. Of course, it was strictly coincidental when Rove’s office was found bugged in 1986, the day of a critical debate between another one of his inarticulate candidates and an incumbent governor. That mystery overwhelmed debate coverage and implicated the democratic opponent. I remember standing with other reporters outside of Rove’s building after his news conference to announce the revelation he was bugged. We all laughed about how amateurish it all appeared.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Holy shit, I forgot about the TAPE from 2000!
Rove is lower than slime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. Olberman for Brains of the Outfit. My theory is that he's watched
an odd combination of NFL coaches, politicians, and mediawhores which enables him to understand what many in our party apparently don't.

1)The only way to win a blood sport is to play for blood with absolute ruthlessness.

2)Politics is a blood sport.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. ya, he has been on this rove angle. he doesnt trust him
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Olberman is the one who let Richard Clarke know on air
Edited on Mon Sep-20-04 09:15 PM by janeaustin
that he had received three faxes from the White House with questions he should ask Clarke.

I imagine he wasn't too crazy about that.


(edited for malaprop)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. Not Clarke-Joseph Wilson
Joseph Wilson-Talking points

I still remember how shocked I was to see actual evidence the White House tried to influence the *news*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Oh, you're right!
At first I couldn't remember at all, then I thought I remembered it's being Clarke.

But I think you are right, and it was Wilson.

Thanks for the correction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
18. Olberman knows crap when he sees it and this thing stinks badly.
The question at hand is: "Why did Dan Bartlett (WH Spokespupet) not condemn the documents as fakes?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
37. He's one of the few whose bullshit detector isn't broken. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
19. MacDougald (aka "Buckhead") made previous posts about bogus memos
I counted four posts made by Buckhead at Free Republic discussing bogus documents in the days before the CBS story broke about the Col. Killian memos. In this case, however, he was claiming that the French had created bogus documents regarding the Iraq-Niger connection and uranium, all to have them become apparently bogus to others in order to discredit the Iraq-Niger uranium connection and to "poison the well" (the same tactic some are saying was used by Karl Rove).

JUST ANOTHER STRANGE COINCIDENCE????? Here are Buckhead's 4 posts:

"...Italy Blames France For Niger Uranium Claim
Posted by Buckhead to marron
On News/Activism 09/04/2004 8:06:28 PM PDT · 23 of 37
My read is that France created the bogus documents to conceal real uranium transactions with Iraq. Iraq needed black market uranium because its existing stockpiles were controlled and could not be used without the IAEA and the inspectors and so on finding out. If you recall, the State Department argued that no such uranium sales were possible because the French were in control of uranium in Niger. Yeah, the French would never do anything contemptuous for money..."

And another previous post:

"...CIA Leak Probe: Powell's Grand-Jury Appearance (PLAME/WILSON PROBE)
Posted by Buckhead to Shermy; cyncooper
On News/Activism 08/02/2004 3:41:12 PM PDT · 46 of 54
Here's my attempt to win the game show:
The French, who controlled Niger's uranium production, cut a side deal with Saddam and Niger to sell additional uranium under the table. They had off the books production that could be shipped without the books looking wrong. The French did this because this kind of treachery and corruption is so classically French, and because they were being bribed via Oil for Food, also classically French. As British Intelligence picked up on this transaction and reported it to the US, the French got wind of it and concocted the forged documents to discredit the accurate reporting, while assuring the US they would never sell uranium to the Iraqis. The French disinformation campaign exploited and was exploited by the anti-Bush faction at the CIA.
Fire at will..."

And another previous post:

"...Plame's Input Is Cited on Niger Mission (Joe Wilson lied about EVERYTHING)
Posted by Buckhead to Shermy
On News/Activism 07/10/2004 5:46:24 AM PDT · 50 of 451
An excerpt:
The report also said Wilson provided misleading information to The Washington Post last June. He said then that he concluded the Niger intelligence was based on documents that had clearly been forged because "the dates were wrong and the names were wrong."..."

And another previous post in July about "forged documents" to "poison the well":

"...Plame's Input Is Cited on Niger Mission (Joe Wilson lied about EVERYTHING)
Posted by Buckhead to piasa; Shermy; cyncooper
On News/Activism 07/10/2004 10:14:28 PM PDT · 292 of 451
Some speculations:
1. It is possible that the Senate Committee conclusions are strongly influenced/manipulated by the anti Bush faction in the CIA. It doesn't even jibe with David Kay's interim report, from what I've seen on FR.
2. The French released the forged documents to (a) poison the well and taint by association the wmd intelligence just out of plain old French cussedness, and/or (b) to cover their own tracks in selling the stuff, and God knows what else to the Iraqis..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. the fact that....
...GOP activist/lawyer Harry MacDougland first challenged the documents and Liz MacDougland was one of two who passed MacDougland's comments to the GOP lawyer who passed it to Drudge is not unimportant.

1. Harry MacDougland (Scaife operative/lawyer)

2. Liz MacDougland and bitter swiftie Tim Mortensen

3. Powerline (run by three GOP lawyers)

4. Drudge

5. MSM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
24. i saw that segemnt, it was interesting and a great guest
Look at how Bush will benefit from this:
1. Takes the attention away from his lack of service
2. Nail that so-called liberal Media. especially Dan cause 41 sure didn't like him
3, there will be a segement of the population that will now ironically view Bush as a victim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Wolf and others on CNN were spinning it to say the memos were false
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I love Countdown but thats all i can take of cable
and i've almost given up on PBS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
33. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC