Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Burkett's lawyer interview

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
riverwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 07:59 PM
Original message
Burkett's lawyer interview
on CNN. Was very strange. Says Lucy Ramirez called Burkett, said she worked for the Guard and had these papers. Said he could have them, but was so concerned about her identity, and the possiblity of "DNA traces" that she made him promise to burn the originals after he made the Kinko copies. Said some guy gave them to him at a rodeo, and vanished. Said he burned the original after making Kinko copies in Waco.
Why would a retiree be so concerned about her identity? DNA traces??Why would Burkett, after being screwed in every way by the bu$hcos, losing his pension, the whole bit, BURN the originals? If he finally had something to get dumya, would he really BURN them? I don't think so. It just gets curiouser and curiouser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, Luuuuuuuucy!
Where are you, Luuuucy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Given what I've read of people...
... speaking of Burkett's character, I can understand, in a way, him following through on his promise.

That he did not stop to think that he was being set up (which would negate, morally, any promises he might have made for the person's anonymity) is the great shame in this. In a weird, backhanded way, he may have been an unknowing participant in his own undoing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I just feel bad for him
he has been through so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheshire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Does Lucy have a Texas drawl? Yes Georgie what ever you say Georgie.
Lucy/Laura?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. "Lousey" is actually a man
And that man's name is Karl "Goebbels" Rove.
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh Luuucyyy, you got some esplaining to do! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A_Possum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. I see only two choices here
Edited on Tue Sep-21-04 08:16 PM by A_Possum
1) Either Burkett did forge the memos, and is lying his head off now to make it seem he didn't, or

2) CBS got caught in the middle of a Rove scam in which Rove had planted the memos on naive Burkett, who had been posting on the net about his feelings about Bush. Rove's intention was that Burkett would pass the copies to the Kerry campaign, who would air them and then get caught with the forgery. However, Kerry campaign wasn't interested (Burkett couldn't even get a phone call from them) CBS got in the middle and snatched the memos and Burkett got his "in" to talk to Lockhart.

Occam's razor would suggest #1 as the simplest. But there are certainly some weird aspects to the whole thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC