Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anyone know if Elizabeth Edwards is going to get more face time?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
PlanetBev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 02:15 AM
Original message
Does anyone know if Elizabeth Edwards is going to get more face time?
I'm telling you, Karen Hughes, Lynn Cheney and Laura Bush are make big inroads into the women's vote with that "W" is for women shit. I've been hearing that the fabled gender gap is non-existant this year. Laura's so-called pro-choice position is buffaloing a lot of women, making her look harmless. Believe you me, that woman is lethal. You see Laura Bush all over the place and you never get to see John or Elizabeth Edwards. Why the hell are they hiding the Edwards team from the media?

Once again Kerry campaign, wake up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Droopy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Edwards is out there campaigning all across the country
It's not his fault that the media isn't covering him, nor is there anything the Kerry campaign can do about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Elizabeth is out campaigning, too.
She is travelling without John, making campaign stops and speeches in some places. She was in Iowa recently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. she IS going around, but they don't show her or Teresa as they do
the Bush women.

and unlike the bush women elizabeth and teresa go out and speak on the issues and take challenging questions from people. they are amazing. and the kerry and edwards girls are also part of getting out the women votes as are kerry's sisters. but our side is not getting media attention. i guess the media doesn't like it that us democratic women actually have something to say .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
secular_warrior Donating Member (705 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. Elizabeth? I'm wondering if John Edwards is going to get more face time
I feel very strongly that Cahill and Shrum have mismanaged this campaign on so many levels.

Elizabeth and Teresa should be out there, but instead these 'strategists' are listening to the media cries about Teresa being a 'liability'.

John Edwards needs to have a NATIONAL role in this campaign (not just a local media one), leading the populist assault on this corporate-owned Administration. He needs to carve up Cheney and the rest of the criminals like I know Edwards can -- with a nice sharp knife and a smile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. Democratic women have to go topless to get the media coverage
Rethugs get. Or they have to say something that can be made to sound outrageous to get their own unique negative coverage never extended to the RWers. See the FAIR website for evidence of the bias against feminists in the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. Elizabeth could help to reclaim some of the women's vote..
... that the campaign has been losing of late.

There's just something about Elizabeth that exudes "home", "comfort" and "safety" -- the warm smile, the twinle in her eye, the laugh, the easy playfulness with her small children. She has an appeal that no other player in this arena has at the moment, especially because the other candidates' children are grown.

Bush is stealing women's votes by playing on fear; Elizabeth could grab those votes right back because her very demeanor cancels that out.

Note to K/E team: get Elizabeth out there in front of the cameras as much as you possibly can!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
7. She was in SW PA yesterday - good local story


Elizabeth Edwards, wife of Democratic vice presidential nominee John Edwards, serves cantaloupe to victims of Friday's flooding during a visit to the Millvale Community Center yesterday.

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04266/383299.stm

At DeNunzio's Italian restaurant in Jeannette, the Democrats' potential "second lady," Elizabeth Edwards, is midway through another long day of solo campaigning. She's running behind schedule; her campaign aides have already given her the 'cut' sign.

But she protests and calls on a woman with a query the campaign of the Democratic presidential challenger, Massachusetts Sen. John F. Kerry, has struggled for months to answer with clarity: Why did Kerry vote for the war on Iraq and then vote against its funding?

"Let me tell you what happened," Elizabeth Edwards answers simply. The vote of Kerry and her husband, North Carolina Sen. John Edwards, to authorize the use of force in Iraq was like hammer, she explains, to pressure then-Iraqi President Saddam Hussein -- 'like pulling out a switch, if you're a mom' -- a threat of force they'd hoped that the United States would never have to use. And at the time, Edwards and Kerry insisted that if there were an invasion by U.S. forces, there must be a plan for peace in the aftermath.

But after the Iraq invasion, there was no plan from the president, Edwards insisted. Security in Iraq was deteriorating, and something had to be done to ensure soldiers' safety. So when Bush sought $87 billion more for the war effort, Edwards and Kerry refused to give him "a blank check."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC