Georgewbush.com - Why don't they have an online forum?

[Roland99]

What are your thoughts?

We all know www.johnkerry.com has an online forum where supporters and even some detractors can post their opinions and bits of news.

Why doesn't the Bush/Cheney campaign have one? It takes about 30 seconds to set one up these days.

Are they afraid of something or just merely incompetent?

[DoYouEverWonder]

1. Are you kidding

let the Bushbots have an opinion? Oh no, that wouldn't be prudent.

[ikojo]

2. If there was a way to mandate a loyalty oath to forum

members then there would be a forum. As long as forums are open to all (even those willing to pay) with no background checks then people like * will not have a forum.
Who wants to hear from ordinary 'murkans anyway? The only thing ordinary 'murkans are good for is showing up to the polls to support *, after that all he needs 'murkans for is cannon fodder and counter help at Wal-Mart and Mickey D's

[Bread and Circus]

3. The are all about "command and control"

First, what the hell is this supposed to mean?



Check it out at the gwb homepage. Talk about using 9/11 for political
gain.

Second, I search the site. They have "blog" but no comments section. Pretty pathetic. It doesn't seem like a blog to me, just talking points beneath the title "blog". Misleading to say the least. It's part of their anti-Liberty ethos.

[ikojo]

4. If the Democrats were an effective OPPOSITION party then

this business of using 9/11 for political gain on the part of the pugs would back fire big time. The Dems need to point out that BUSH/CHENEY/RUMSFELD/RICE/ASHCROFT were in power on 9/10/01 as well as 9/11/01. They didn't take office on 9/12/01 but were there BEFORE 9/11!

Of course if Clinton or the all powerful CLENIS used 9/11 in a similar way the Republicans and their supporters in the Dem party (Lieberman, Daschle, Zell Miller, et al) would lead the attacks against such uses.

What do the Dems do when shrub uses 9/11? Sit back and HOPE it back fires! Just like they HOPED the swift boat lies wouldn't take hold. We see how effective that strategy was...a good number of people believed the swift boaters for lies.

[justgamma]

5. I want to know

why I have to go to Shrub's site to see where Kerry will be. Why the heck can't I go to Kerry's site to find out where he and Edwards will be. This is really a pet peave of mine. You want people to come see them and some of us have to make plans.

[cheshire]

6. No way to prove oathes are real.

[MockSwede]

7. Oath of Allegiance

I guess they haven't figured out how to get cybersignatures for the OATH to let the 'chosen' in to visit with the 'anointed'.

[elperromagico]

8. Because who cares what you think?

;)