Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry needs to ANNOUNCE a new IRAQ policy NOW!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Cartooner Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:10 PM
Original message
Kerry needs to ANNOUNCE a new IRAQ policy NOW!
Edited on Sat Sep-18-04 10:11 PM by Cartooner
Kerry needs to set a date certain to exit. There will be those who criticize by saying "Won't those who died fighting the war have died in vain?" ... The answer is..."Do we want MORE to continue to die in this WRONG WAR? Would THAT justify the deaths of those who HAVE died? We are occupiers. We got rid of the tyrant; but now, because of Bush's VIET NAM, all hell has broken loose."

What will result from our setting an exit date?
1. Many Iraqi's will be glad to say "good-bye".
2. There MIGHT be a civil war... but, it's not our fight, it's theirs.
3. Al Qaida might gain a foot-hold. If they do, we need to take them out wherever we find them. WE'RE OVER THERE NOW... and Al Qaida operates by kidnapping, ambushes and car-bombings. We're not successful with taking them out. If we were, they'd be gone.
4. We need to concentrate on getting bin Laden.
5. We're trying to set up a pseudo-democracy. That's foolish; it MUST be something THEY want... not something WE want. People WE put into power makes a mockery of letting THEM choose, anyway.
6. We should tell neighboring countries: Saudi Arabia, Iran, Turkey, Syria that we'll be leaving (on that exit date). They'd BETTER pull their insurgent contingents out, if they don't want anarchy there which could spill over into THEIR countries.
7. John Kerry would be able to save further lives and rebuild our military.
8. Money we've been throwing down that hell-hole could be better spent relaiming our own economy.
9. We could begin re-building our relations with other countries of the world.
.... and
10. We could better focus our efforts against our REAL enemies, instead of that little country that's about half the size of Texas.

As Garrison Keillor has said so eloquently:
"... it's 9/11 that we keep coming back to. It wasn't the 'end of innocence,' or a turning point in our history, or a cosmic occurrence, it was an event, a lapse of security. And patriotism shouldn't prevent people from asking hard questions of the man who was purportedly in charge of national security at the time." But 9/11 was NOT connected to Iraq.

And so, I'm asking those hard questions NOW... WHY CAN'T WE CALL THE IRAQ WAR BUSH'S VIET NAM?... THAT'S WHAT IT IS. And why can't John Kerry depart from Bush's stupid philosophy that has us in that endless bloodbath quagmire? ... HE MUST DO IT!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Do you understand ANYTHING about international relations?
WE INVADED. WE ARE RESPONSIBLE.

It isn't anybody else's job.

However since we will never be allowed to mend what we broke.....the only possible opportunity for getting out is a change of leadership.

I honestly don't believe it works for Kerry to publicly undermine the current US government, as much as it deserves it.

And Kerry doesn't know what he'll find or what the situation will be when he gets in. To set himself in stone now is to handcuff himself. It's ridiculous.

Wanting him to come up with a plan for an unwinnable war is not doing him a favor.

Tell you what. Ask George for a plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cartooner Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. OF COURSE I UNDERSTAND... this is BUSH'S WAR
In case you didn't notice, this was wrong wrong wrong... We invaded BECAUSE OF THAT IDIOT WE HAVE IN THE WHITEHOUSE.... Is HE the one you wish to defend? .. I SURE AS HELL DON'T ...

MOREOVER, the Iraqi people don't want us there. ...

They can pick up the pieces BETTER THAN WE CAN.

What we're picking up are U.S. BODIES. ...

THAT'S WHAT I UNDERSTAND...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cartooner Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. I DIDN'T SET THAT EXIT DATE... But Kerry should do so
He HAS said we'll exit in 4 years... THAT'S AN EXIT DATE. Frankly, I think it should be sooner. But, his judgement is what he'll have to live with.

Anyway... the EXIT DATE is something he should POUND HOME!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stldemocrat Donating Member (296 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I'm with you
We need to get out of there, and Kerry needs to go with what he *really* feels and say he will get us the heck out of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Well, since the Brits are withdrawing from Iraq beginning in October
I think that the US will be left holding a well-deserved bag!

See this thread for the UK troop pullout:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x839088

Britain to cut troop levels in Iraq

Jason Burke, chief reporter
Sunday September 19, 2004
The Observer

The British Army is to start pulling troops out of Iraq next month despite the deteriorating security situation in much of the country, The Observer has learnt.
The main British combat force in Iraq, about 5,000-strong, will be reduced by around a third by the end of October during a routine rotation of units.

The news came amid another day of mayhem in Iraq, which saw a suicide bomber kill at least 23 people and injure 53 in the northern city of Kirkuk. The victims were queueing to join Iraq's National Guard.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1307980,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabelais Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. "we" didn't invade, "we" are not responsible
Bush did.
If YOU feel responsible then YOU go enlist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hansolsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. What if Kerry announces new plans for Iraq that accelerate ending the
war? Can you support that??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cartooner Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. BUSH has said he can't see an end to this thing
KERRY can show he's brighter, a better leader, can keep America safer, and most importantly can be a better president if he DISAGREES with this WRONG war of Bush's and

states that WE MUST SET AN EXIT DATE.

Kerry can say "I've been through a VIET NAM and I know one when I see it. My opponent HAS NOT ... he only knows ONE thing... that he DOESN'T know how to end the war."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upfront Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Agree
Will he do it? Doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. But, there is so much oil in Iraq that if the U.S can just get a...
...cooperative government set up and U.S. corporations can be secure and keep their presence there, with 20% of the known world oil reserves under Iraq and all of the profits flowing into American invester owned pockets, the Humvee business will be set for the next 50 years minimum. :freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Iran would defacto control 40% the country in a month
Edited on Sat Sep-18-04 10:24 PM by billbuckhead
Allawi could be the mayor of Baghdad for a year or two.

How many refugees will we take in? This just pull out scenario would be unrealistic and would make the world incredibly dangerous. George Bush has been a genius of sorts at getting America stuck in a quagmire. Furthermore, Wall Street has already leveraged the oil we're stealing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolinian Donating Member (861 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kerry would have to be in office to see just what he is faced with before
he can make any commitments. I'm afraid we cannot pull out until the region is stable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicktom Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Unless we pull out, how will the region EVER be stable?
Would Iran try to take over? Probably. Will there be a civil war? Probably. Until Iraq freely, even post civil war, choses their way of government there is no chance of stability in Iraq, let alone the rest of the middle east.

I agree this is GWB's mess. But it seems to me that GHWB started this by keeping the U.S. in SA after gulf war 1. Had we not been there 911 might never have happened.

Having said all of that, I'm not sure it would help Kerry prior to being elected to endorse the original posters ideas. But I am tempted because it has become so ugly over there and only promises to get worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolinian Donating Member (861 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. THAT is the quagmire. But even so, we (Bush) created the mess and
we simply cannot abandon those poor people in their present state. I feel we need to bring other nations to the table and then perhaps together we can begin to sort out a way of ending this miserable affair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. I was a "we broke it so we need to fix it" person but it is clear now
Edited on Sat Sep-18-04 10:34 PM by Pirate Smile
that we can't.

The focus of our policy needs to be to make sure it can't become another breeding ground for AQ.

Baghdad Bush keeps trying to emphasize that Iraq is on its way to democracy and freedom.

Kerry should emphasize that the security of this country is his number one priority and Iraq needs to be viewed through that prism not the faulty rose colored and delusional glasses that the people running this Administration have been using on Iraq.

The sad thing is it wasn't a breeding ground for AQ before but it is now.

Answers? I don't have them.

What a friggin disaster.

I was against the damn thing before it ever happened but the utter incompetence of this Administration has even shocked me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-04 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
25. I was also a "we broke it, we need to fix it" proponent . . .
but this thing has become a total disaster . . . every day we stay there costs us more in lives (both American and Iraqi), dollars, world prestige, and credibility . . . Kerry's best bet may be to announce that BushCo has fucked things up so badly that our only option is to get the hell out ASAP . . . hell, it won't lose him any more votes than he's losing with his current "Bush lite" position . . . might actually gain him some . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dreadneck Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. Maybe the insurgents will get the message...
if we just use enough CAPITAL LETTERS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cartooner Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Maybe the American VOTER will get the message if . . .
Kerry has a policy that can be noticeably different from the idiot who is in the Whitehouse.... Wouldn't that be something...

I'm an old debate coach... I do understand international relations...and I also understand DEBATING...

If you think agreeing with Bush is gonna win this thing for Kerry... I have news for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hansolsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. I tried to go down this road yesterday. Beware DU war supporters --
they have their flame throwers out. Of course, I happen to agree with you, and so does the whole campaign team apparently. See today's WP:

Link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A31726-2004Sep18.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Disagreeing with the immediate pullout scenario
does not make one a "war supporter".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cartooner Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. DID I SAY IMMEDIATE? ...
Edited on Sat Sep-18-04 10:49 PM by Cartooner
Could you please read my posts... a DATE CERTAIN... is a DIFFERENT policy than BUSH'S ...

What Kerry needs very badly is to SHOW he has a POLICY... and NOT an AGREEMENT with Bush.

Many people find it very WEAK of Kerry to say, "Don't ask ME for a policy... ASK The President." That doesn't show Kerry's ability to KNOW WHAT TO DO...

People vote for strength and decisions... not for "ask the other guy" stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Protected Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Bush has already spun the "pull out on this date" scenario
It goes something like this (paraphrasing): "The evil doers and freedoms haters will just wait until that day plus one to unleash their evilness. This is not the type of message we want to give to our enemy."

But I do agree that Kerry needs to get his Iraq policy out there to the voters. Probably he needs something that can be said in under 15 seconds so that the evening news people can play it without much effort on their part. Bush is an expert at this stuff so I don't understand why Kerry or his people still can't figure it out. The spin from the Bush campaign ("Kerry has seven different positions on Iraq") is just killing him, in my humble opinion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hansolsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. I agree with that, and was not referring to your post specifically. I am
just reacting to other posters who deeply resent direct criticism of Kerry's currently stated plans for Iraq.

I think many DU bloggers are too dug in supporting Kerry's current Iraq plans and are not open to the possibility he will radically change those plans before this campaign is over.

I further suspect there is a cohert of DU bloggers who are card carrying members of the Joe Lieberman / DLC wing of the party who would fall off their stool if Kerry really starts bashing the Iraq war as bad policy. Just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nancy Waterman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I think Kerry needs to divide the country into three parts
A very loose federation, each part with its own laws and customs. Turkey will just have to deal with having Kurdistan next door. It is better than a civil war. The three federated sections can share the oil wealth/economic issues collectively but be independent religiously and culturally. The US can seal the borders til they get it all together and give them some money to pay LOCAL contracotrs to do reconstruction. Let Sistani organize his troops for an army and a police force and have sharia law for his people. Let the Kurds do their thing. And let the Sunnis have a secular Islamic republic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hansolsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Good, now we are discussing real alternatives in Iraq. thanks. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedzbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-04 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
26. It's too late.
He already let * frame the issue on his terms and to change course will only make Kerry look flip floppy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC