As soon as Kerry launched his more aggressive attacks on Bush's incompetence, dishonesty, and manipulative abuse of power, his poll numbers started to leap, wiping out Bush's bounce in non-corporate media polls, and even paring it down in tweaked media polls. So now they are trying to silence Kerry by convincing him that his "aggressive tactics may not be working," using as "evidence" a new round of tweaked corporate media polls. DON'T LISTEN TO 'EM JFK! The Repugs and their media pals pulled the same crap on Gore. They also pulled the same crap on the Democrats in fall 2002, convincing them that the public wanted them to take a more pro-war stance - the OPPOSITE, of course, was true and when the Dems caved in to the pressure they lost big time at the polls in a punishment vote. It's a con!
Conflicting Polls Reflect Just One Thing: Media Manipulation
Media pollsters are feigning amazement over the current conflicting spread of poll results. But there is no REAL conflict here. The divergence did not come until the GOP convention. Obviously something happened then. The clue as to what that was lies in WHICH polls show Bush with a huge lead: ALL are mainstream media polls: USA Today, CNN, NY Times, Washington Post, ABC, etc. Polls less connected to the Bushie media show a pattern that is consistent with the entire campaign (Harris, Rasmussen, Zogby, et al.). This is not coincidence. We know for a fact that several of the media polls began manipulating their "weighting" system in a dishonest manner (non-media pollster John Zogby spotted Newsweek's scheme right away). The media publicize their own manipulated polls, not the traditional pollsters' results. Thus, they are using their skewed polls as "marketing devices" - selling Bush like their latest name brand coming out ahead in a rigged "national taste test."
http://www.democrats.com/