Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When did they have the Nobel voting?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 10:41 PM
Original message
When did they have the Nobel voting?
I saw he was nominated right away, not long after he became president, but when did they vote on it?

Because he received it for his last year of work, which is what the prize is offered for, and since the moment he took office until now has been a sea change in international relations. That should not be controversial at all, he's done quite a lot in the last year. Maybe not enough, but he almost single-handedly changed the international relations dynamic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. You knew he'd been nominated?
Can you find a link on that because the Nobel Peace Prize site says the nominees are kept secret for 50 years....unless they are announced to be the winner.


Number of nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009

Every year, the Norwegian Nobel Committee sends out thousands of letters inviting a qualified and select number of people to submit their nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize. The names of the nominees cannot be revealed until 50 years later, but the Nobel Peace Prize committee does reveal the number of nominees each year.

205 names were submitted for the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize, 33 of which are organizations. The Nobel Committees in Physics, Chemistry, Physiology or Medicine, Literature and the Prize Committee for Economics each usually receives 250-300 names every year, but this is the highest number of nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize ever. The last record was in 2005 when the Committee received 199 nominations.

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/shortfacts.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think the poster is saying that Obama was nominated in January and everyone knows this
because that is when the nominating process takes place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Then how come we knew about Gore -- and that Sarkozy was a nominee
this time around? I think I"m misunderstanding this. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Princess Turandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's possible that the nominators are not sworn to secrecy?..
Although, I would think they would be. A lot of it is conjecture, I think. Gore kind of made sense even without an info 'leak'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I knew I was misunderstanding it -- obviously they tell the nominees - duh!
Don't know what I was thinking. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. LOL I'm misunderstanding it too.
Yeah how did they know about Sarkozy? Gore won so that was an easy one. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. see the other replies to your post nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. US presidents are always nominated
People made a big show of Bush being nominated or the peace prize every year he was in office. The other prizes tend to be less mediagenic, so people are less likely to leak things or shout to the skies that they're nominating so and so or whatever else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Princess Turandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. They are somewhat secretive about this, I think..
They take nominations for several months, ending at the beginning of February. There are only certain categories of folks who can submit actual nominations, so the dopes who sent letters to them over the years 'nominating' Bush likely did not count among that group of nominators.

Then they have staff who apparently vet/gather information about the candidates whom the Committee is actually interested in. Given that there's 8 months between the nomination deadline and the announcement, my guess (only) is that they vote much closer to the announcement date then February.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. that's what I thought
I thought they voted right around when they gave it out. Plus, if they say voted months ago, even among a small group that is tough to keep a secret.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Princess Turandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 05:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. The only thing I've seen which 'seems' to get an alert on the winner..
is Kirjasto.org's 'Authors' Calender. They are a Finnish company which seems to add the info about the Lit Prize winner seconds after it's announced. (I track the Peace and Lit winners for a Google Earth project of mine.

On the other hand, maybe they are just good guessers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. They voted in October
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. do you have a link to that?
Not that I don't believe you, it makes sense, I just would like to read more on it myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. It was on this past Monday......
Edited on Sat Oct-10-09 12:10 AM by FrenchieCat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. thanks for the link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
16. Last week at a caucus in Dubuque.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC