Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Delete - dupe (original thread on Teixeira linked below)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 12:10 PM
Original message
Delete - dupe (original thread on Teixeira linked below)
Edited on Sat Sep-18-04 12:18 PM by swag
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=834767&mesg_id=834767



For example:

http://www.emergingdemocraticmajorityweblog.com/donkeyrising/

September 17, 2004

CBS News/New York Times Poll Has It Close to Even!

Well, that is if you weight their data to conform to the 4 point Democratic party ID lead which we have good reason to believe is the underlying distribution in the voting electorate. As many have already heard, the new CBS News/New York Times poll, conducted September 12-16, gives Bush an 8 point lead (50-42) among RVs--but also gives the Republicans a 4 point edge on party ID. Reweight their data to conform to an underlying Democratic 4 point edge (using the 39D/35R/26I distribution from the 2000 exit poll) and you get a nearly even race, 47 Bush/46 Kerry.

Nearly even. That goes along with the the 46-46 tie in the Pew Research Center poll (which gave the Democrats a 4 point edge on party ID without weighting) and the 48-48 tie in the Gallup poll (once weighted to reflect an underlying Democratic 4 point edge). Not to mention the two other recent national polls (Harris, Democracy Corps) that show the race within one point.

Perhaps all this is just a coincidence, but the pattern seems striking. Once you adjust for the apparent overrepresentation of Republican identifiers in some samples, the polls all seem to be saying the same thing: the race is a tie or very close to it.

. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zell in Hell Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. The right will argue...
That these adujustments distort the true picture and that there are more registered Republicans now than in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They are welcome to their mistaken hypotheses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dick_Tuck Donating Member (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good article
I think that the LV algorithms have a major flaw this cycle. That's with the youth vote. 18-24 year olds are usually apathetic, and vote in much smaller numbers than 55-65 year olds. The Iraq war has this group as energized as they were in 1972. You've also got the Howard Stern schwing voters, who probably don't pass LV muster. And you have the minority voters, who've been hit the hardest by the Bush economy.

OTOH, Bush has alienated "Log Cabin" voters, fiscal conservatives, and isolationist paleoconservatives. People like Tucker Carlson and Andrew Sullivan are speaking against Bush's civil liberties positions. Buchanan and Buckley are speaking out against Bush's foreign policies. Paul O'Neil, and others are speaking out against Bush's fiscal policies.

All these factors make me think that the LV polls could be off as much as 3-5 points. I chalk up the two 13 point polls to just being outliers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC