|
I think I'm about to all but give up on expecting NPR's ME and ATC to be neutral reporters on the upcoming election. Lately, my routine for listening to these shows' election coverage has been to ask myself: am I listening to John Kerry's voice? George Bush's voice? Am I listening to a message that George Bush wants me to hear about Kerry or himself, even if it's not coming from George Bush? Is it a message about Bush that Kerry wants me to hear?
Well, lately, I hear very little from Kerry (unless it's meant to criticize Kerry), I hear a lot from Bush directly, and I hear a lot of messages from people who aren't Bush, but who emphasize Bush's message. And anything that could remotely be perceived as a criticism of Bush is rarely put in the context of the campaign, or in the context of a choice on election day between two policy agendas.
Today's ATC is a perfect example. The first story in today's show that was relevant to the election was "Report: Saddam Had 'Intent', But No Weapons." Marie Louise Kelly waited until the end of the story to put it in the context of the election and made sure to tell listeners that this story wouldn't have any influence on the election.
That was followed by the LAMEST excuse for repeating Bush campaign attacks on John Kerry I've heard recently (and that's saying ALOT, because NPR et al. are trying pretty hard to do this). "Before Bush Speaks, Partisans Preach to Faithful" was little more than free advertising for the Bush campaign. What would Kerry have to pay to have you play clips from his stump speeches for as long as you played clips from Bush's? And don't give me any BS about there being a legitimate news story behind that. What ATC was doing was transparent, and NPR should be ashamed of itself, and its local affiliates should be ashamed to broadcast this trash.
And what was that followed by? "On the Campaign Trail, a 'George Bush Special.'" Mind you, I haven't heard John Kerry's name mentioned positively ONCE yet. I've been told that he gains nothing from Sadaam having intent but no weapons. I've heard him called a "waffler." I've heard repeated jokes about him. Yet we're already on to George Bush being humanized for ordering his own food before we give Kerry any chance to respond to the attacks? Oh, come on.
Incidentally, I applied my aforementioned test to your "Bush, Kerry Fight for Ohio" story. Here's what I came up with: OK, finally I heard Kerry's voice talking about the campaign. But after Bush's, and Bush is already way ahead in total time on tonight's broadcast. And, after all, how could you do a story that's explicitly about the CAMPAIGN without actually letting us hear from Kerry? Ok, I'm sure you'll figure out a way to do that before November if it's still close, but not tonight. The real zinger in this story was ATC playing the voice of Bush campaign workers READING THEIR PHONE BANK SCRIPT!!! The Kerry campaign worker talked about mechanics of the campaign. The Bush campaign workers got to read their GOD DAMNED SCRIPT ON THE AIR. That was worth a million dollars to the Republicans. The Kerry callers have to do this one person at a time, and will probably reach only 10,000 people today. But NPR just ensured that Bush's script will have reached 10,000,000 listeners tonight. Mara Liasson better be getting a check from the Bush campaign -- and she should add a line to her resume: assistant campaign manger. She's doing a great job of helping Bush with media and GOTV.
And where does all this leave me as a listener? It leaves me begging my local affiliates to start thinking about decentralizing the control over the message. How about an hour of ATC and ME and 2 hours of locally controlled, locally relevant news? I'd rather have my local stations produce versions of national, state and local news. I'd rather have people who live in my community interpret world, national, and local events. I'm going to give up on expecting NPR to be responsible producers of the news.
|