I knew it the supreme court put Nadar on FL ballot. They did it again.

[cheshire]

CNN. Here we go again. I see Nadar is syphoning of Bush but we will see. Nadar had a convention in Texas, (I missed that)It was small. Just your basic should he or should he not, blah, blah, blah on CNN

[hlthe2b]

1. you do know it was the FLORIDA Supreme Court, not the US, right?

[dennis4868]

2. I am sure Bush.....

will appeal this because he does not trust the FL. supreme court.....

[cheshire]

4. Yes but the FL court were involved also. I'm just saying this is the begin

ning.

[arcos]

5. the FL SC ruled for Gore in 2000... n/t

[cheshire]

6. So the supreme court of FL for Gore was OK But SC of US for * is not?

I'm just saying either way this is getting crazy voting going to the courts all the time.

[KC21304]

7. I would say yes, of course. The Fla Supreme court was

ruling on Fla law. Isn't that who should do it ? What in the hell is the SCOTUS doing sticking it's nose in a state voting rights case ?

[chelsea0011]

3. Is this the same liberal Supreme Court Republicans hated

when things weren't going their way back in 2000? Now they are happy ducks with the court.

[thecrow]

8. I hope this backfires on the Rethugs, I really do.

Imagine a voter who is at a crossroads.
He just can't in his heart vote for * because he realizes what a lying SOS * is. He can't vote for Kerry either, because the Swift Liars really pulled at his heart strings.
Where does he then go?
Bingo. Nader.