Attack on Iraq will be effective but how do we define Bush?

[usregimechange]

Poll question: Attack on Iraq will be effective but how do we define Bush?

We can effectively attack on Iraq and that may be enough to sink Bush, along with the horrible reality over there. But how do we define Bush? One thing for certain is we all must define him collectively over and over. I think the Kerry camp hasn't quite come to an agreement. How should we define Bush? Oh, and only one thing because we don't want to complicate things for the public. Cartoons not text books. Also, I am not asking for your opinion (because than it would be all of the above) I am asking you what would be the more politically effective. Bush is a...

[usregimechange]

1. Is being a miserable failure more of a thing and less of a trait?

Is it what you get when he is President or is he a miserable failure? What will the public think?

[usregimechange]

2. Ok, how about what does the campaign want us to do?

[guitar man]

3. "inflexible"

Let's call him what he is, "inflexible", unable to adapt, adjust or change course to meet changing dynamics. His "stay the course" come hell or high water needs to be cast as something similar to what caused the Titanic to hit the iceberg.

[Zen Democrat]

4. Kerry has been defining him all week ----------- INCOMPETENT