Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

we will win because....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
private_ryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 08:50 PM
Original message
we will win because....
Edited on Thu Sep-23-04 08:52 PM by private_ryan
I'm not looking for talking points or wishful thinking. Be honest and say what issue is going to resonate with the average people.

the scariest part is the Supreme Court judges the winner will have to appoint. The economy and most other things can be eventually fixed, but another Scalia will be there for 40 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GainesT1958 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'll sum it up:
We'll win because, THIS year, the "Silent Majority" is solidly behind US!:D

:kick:

B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
osaMABUSh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I had an experience today that reflects what's really going on
out there.

I have a "Defend America, Defeat Bush" bumper sticker on my car and while stuck in traffic today the guy in the car next to me yelled:
"Hey! I'm a Veteran!" I thought this could be bad or good then he says "I agree completely with your bumper sticker!"

I gave him the V for Victory sign and told him Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. People like to point at the economy as one of their reasons..
Edited on Thu Sep-23-04 08:58 PM by tedoll78
I think a big part of that is the deficit.

We saw how powerful that issue was in 1992; it gave Ross Perot 19% of the popular vote back then.. and he was a one-issue candidate on that issue.

I suspect that this deficit is hanging in the back of everyone's minds. I suspect that there are a number of fiscal conservatives who are privately horrified at the fact that a Republican president & a Republican Congress ran-up these deficits. Ask any classic conservatives you know: Would they have tolerated this from Clinton? the hemming and hawing on their answer tells you everything you need to know.

Ordinary people know that a deficit will need to be paid-back at some point in the future. The main question then becomes: do we do the responsible thing - do we pay it off now? Or do we do the other thing - pay it off later, but with interest and even higher tax rates?

I think it's a whopper of an issue, and I wish the Dems would hammer this point a bit more.

-------------

You Scalia comment: AMEN.

Right now, the average term served on the U.S. Supreme Court is approximately 18 years. Assuming that only two justices retire from 2005-2009, we'd be looking at an average of 36 years of court votes. If Stevens were to drop-dead, or if Ginsberg were to have a recurrence of her cancer.. we'd be in for some scaaaary times.

Should Bush end-up back in for the next four years, all Democratic senators will be getting a call from me on the first day of their session in 2005. A simple message from me:
"You filibuster Scalia clones, or I don't show-up to the polls ever again. You need me. I am your party's archetypical core voter."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC