Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

National Security Moms vs. Personal Security Moms

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Southern Patriot Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 11:10 PM
Original message
National Security Moms vs. Personal Security Moms
I caught an NPR discussion today featuring Anna Greenberg, Dem pollster, and Kellie Ann Somebody, Repub pollster.

Greenberg said that the "Security Mom" meme was a Repub theme designed to keep the campaign issues on safe territory for Bush. She admitted that there were conservative, white, middle-class women who fit that description--- but that they were a minority and ALREADY in Bush's camp.

Greenberg said that Kerry was "under-performing" in appealing to a much larger group who defined "security" in economic terms: jobs, affordable medical care, and safe retirement.

It may have been large part spin but she left me feeling a lot better and helped me in targeting pro-Kerry messages to these women.

The American Prospect offers the following explanation of the "security mom" meme. http://www.prospect.org/weblog/archives/2004/09/

<...>

The inventor of the term is Delaware Sen. Joseph Biden, who first used the term, as far as I've been able to ascertain, in testimony on January 28, 2003 to criticize Bush in advance of the Iraq War for confusing and scaring women who just want to keep their children safe into thinking they needed to back the war. Biden later used to term as part of his critique of Congressional Democrats, who tried to bracket homeland security issues during the 2002 mid-term election campaigns, instead of talking about them head-on.

Time magazine writer Joe Klein soon noted that in his February 2003 column on the topic:

Nearly half the American women polled in October by the Gallup Organization say they believe they or someone in their family will soon be victims of an attack (about a third of men do too). But polls don't convey the intensity of these fears. "When I was out campaigning last fall, this was all women wanted to talk about," says Senator Joe Biden of Delaware. "Not schools, not prescription drugs. It was 'What are you doing to protect my kids against terrorists?' Soccer moms are security moms now."
<...>

Biden and Klein were right to recognize that even the most traditional Democratic constituencies, in the post-Sept. 11 world, now cared about security issues in a new way, and that there are very big difference between national security, foreign policy, and homeland security anxieties that polls often don't bother to tease out. For example, if you ask women and men what issue matters most to them, men are more likely to cite national security or terrorism as a priority than are women. But ask people how worried they are about being a terrorist attack victim and most studies on the topic show that women are much more worried than men. The intensity is different, and the focus of that intensity is different, too. The Bushies understand this and have frutifully deployed this nuanced understanding of the electorate to shore up their support with conservative and married women by talking homeland security and about how they'll keep families and children safe. Democrats have been a bit less adept at gendering their security talk to boost support among the subset of women that comprises their traditional base.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who makes up these stupid monikers?
Edited on Sun Sep-26-04 11:13 PM by WillW
Everything, everyone, every idea has to be pigeon-holed in this country before anyone pays attention? Is that it? We need stereotypes and caricatures to make sense of the world? Joe, you're killing me here..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Very interesting take -- thanks, SP --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southern Patriot Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. What do you think DeepModem, Mom?
You're apparently part of the demographic segment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well, I'm a DUer, lucky enough to have friends who pretty much agree...
with me, so I don't know if my opinion is as helpful as the Moms out there we're wondering about. I tend to agree with the divided nation idea, even among this group. The Red State types will be more concerned about protecting their kids from terrorist attacks because they're more likely to get their news from Fox, and just be of that mindset. Blue State-minded Moms, I think, understand that Bush's Iraq war, his contempt for the rest of the world, even his failures in areas of "homeland security," have not made kids safer but put them in more danger.

That leaves those in the middle, and I thought there was validity to the interesting notion that mothers who aren't scared to death with each Ridge or Ashcroft ratcheting up of the threat level are, indeed, worried about the here and now, the everyday concerns about their children's well-being -- providing for them financially ("putting food on them," as W has said), getting health care for them, having a decent school for them to go to, seeing the possibility for a decent job in their future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southern Patriot Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. My wife saw a "security mom" on TV news who worries
everytime that she drops the kids off at daycare.

My wife's comment: "She's wound too tightly."

My initial comment: "Well, she lives in Philadelphia which could be a great terrorist target."

Having thought about it, though, I think that she's more of a victim of fearmongering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. And her kids might be picking up on her constant fear...
which is frightening for them --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southern Patriot Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Nothing short-circuits clear thinking like fear.
Karl Rove knows it uses fear like a political club.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. Another mom checking in
I consider myself a rather mainstream, average, middle-class mom. So it always baffles me when these labels come out that are alleged to portray the female voter and I don't recognize the women they're talking about.

There is nothing in the world more important to me than my husband and kids. But I don't worry all the time about whether they are going to be killed by terrorists. I don't worry about death much at all. We do all the usual things to stay safe. I watch them like a hawk at the pool, make them wear seat belts and bike helmets, check the batteries in the smoke alarms -- all that stuff, sure.

But I don't worry about them being killed by terrorists. Sometimes I worry about them getting beat up by mean kids at school, because that can happen. I lecture them about looking both ways when they cross the street, because kids do get hit by cars. But getting killed by a terrorist is sort of like getting hit by a meteorite -- what are you going to do, live in a cave?

What I do worry about is HOW my kids will live. Will they be happy? Will they get good educations? Will we be able to afford college, and if so, will their educations prepare them to make their way in the world and find fulfilling careers? Will they be healthy? Will the air and water and food be fit to breathe and drink and eat? Will we be able to afford health insurance?

And lately I've been worrying about the kind of world they're going to live in as adults. How do I teach my children to be kind and tolerant and generous in a world where the meanest and greediest and most intolerant get ahead? How can I be sure that they learn the value of cooperation in a nation whose leaders model nothing but arrogance and stubbornness?

I don't think I'm the only mom with these concerns. But I don't think the GOP is interested in my concerns. I think they're interested in naming a supposed group that is ready-made for their perceived strengths, and telling us that is who we are. It's all political posturing, which is upside down and backward from what real leadership should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southern Patriot Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I worry about the America that my kids will inherit, too.
I'm especially worried about the affect FOUR Supreme Court lifetime appointments in the mould of Scalia will create.

Many people don't understand the essential role that Supreme Court decisions played in balancing the power of the individual against the weight of corporations, big government and rich regressives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. That's beautiful. May I send that out to my email list...
...and say that it was written by my friend Liz? I think it could touch some people I know.

23.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Certainly, I'd be honored.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC