Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"911 happened on George Bush's watch!" Why are Dems afraid to say it?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 05:12 PM
Original message
"911 happened on George Bush's watch!" Why are Dems afraid to say it?
Were finally calling * on exploiting 911 at the convention but ... watch the media pundits talk about how "terrorism" is now one of the key issues in this election. They question dem surrogates about how Kerry can't possibly compete with * :eyes: aka (Mr. tough on terror) himself, and how do we respond? "John Kerry will do everything in his power to ....... Blah blah blah.

WE MUST RELATE TO THE AVERAGE AMERICAN.

Not one of our surrogates states the obvious. HELLO!!! Do you think for ONE second the Republicans wouldn't have been harping on this for 3 fargen years now were the shoe on the other foot?

WAKKKKE UPPPP DEMOCRATS! :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Exactly! Holy schneikies....what is so damn hard for people to figure out
about this??
* ignored intelligence
* ignored warnings from our last legitimately elected Pres (get well soon, Big Dog!)
* had war in Iraq planned regardless
* ignored his own experts
* ignored reports
* let 9/11 happen on his watch
* is a moron
* can no more keep us safe than can my 82-year-old Mother, ferpetessake....(actually, my mom being the tolerant, loving, Green peacenik that she is, my money's on Ma...she might at least TRY diplomacy first)

This little weenie is the Worst pResident Ever...
He and his evil henchmen/women MUST be stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. like what W is for....


The other important information they are not talking about is the PNAC group. What about the letter they sent to Clinton regarding war with Irq. Why isn't more being said about this? This was planned back in the 90's. 9-11 was their excuse to go into Iraq. I thought Cheney's name had been on the list, but it isn't listed now. Was I dreaming or was it removed?

http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm

Elliott Abrams Richard L. Armitage William J. Bennett

Jeffrey Bergner John Bolton Paula Dobriansky

Francis Fukuyama Robert Kagan Zalmay Khalilzad

William Kristol Richard Perle Peter W. Rodman

Donald Rumsfeld William Schneider, Jr. Vin Weber

Paul Wolfowitz R. James Woolsey Robert B. Zoellick

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. Well, if you dreamed it, so did I. I think Cheney was a
Edited on Mon Sep-27-04 06:47 PM by DemBones DemBones
signatory.

On edit: And so was Jeb Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. I totally agree, it's the DEMS JOB to educate the voters on the difference
in choice between the candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. Testify Granny!
;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Totally agree
Instead many callers into Washington Journal are making the point of how great *Bush is because no other attacks took place since 9-11. I have heard this same spin on other talk shows.

So if *Dubya is so great because no other attacks have happened on his watch, the reverse is also true.....Because 9-11 happened on his watch he wasn't doing his job. He wasn't protecting us. YOU can't have it both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
25. I know, isn't that ridiculous!
EGADZ! Clinton had ZERO 911's. He also prevented numerous major terrorist attacks. :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RollergirlVT Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
42. aw c'mon
how could poor georgie protect us when those mean old terrorists didn't tell him when, where or how they would strike? Who could've imagined? Terrorists were only a Clinton problem everyone knows that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm not. Everyone knows it.
and those August PDBs Bush ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Most current elected Democrats are wimps!
We need to replace these cowards with some real fighters.

It's so frustrating to watch our side get beaten down time after time.

Look at our leader of the Senate - how fucking pathetic we look!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. exactly. Or start a new party altogether
I am so sick of the democratic party leadership I say it's time to just go around them and start completely over.

Let's start a new "progressive" party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmbo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. I too am mystified that we're afraid to upset Bush with his 9/11 FAILURE!
The GOP can, and incessantly does, use the 9/11 tragedy for their own political benefit. Hell...they're using Mohammad Atta in anti- Kerry ads in battleground states as we speak.

Yet we appear to be afraid to use Bush's documented failures...and they are many... which made 9/11 possible. We've unilaterally disarmed.

The result has been a through-the-looking glass world where Bush...who presided over a colossal intelligence failure which caused the worst terror attack in US history...is considered "strong on terror" by US voters.

When will someone step forward to state the obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. What've we got to lose? Nothin'!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. who you callin' "we"? I'm ready to send Bush to jail for his failures
and so are a lot of us here.

The Dumbocratic leadership are the nimrods here.

Any old Dean-haters wishing he were in the race now?

We want fighters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. EXACTLY!!!!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. My Pet Goat
Edited on Mon Sep-27-04 05:28 PM by oasis
Wait'll "Farentheit 9/11" makes the rounds on the DVD circuit. The public outrage will penetrate the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ive been drilling this one home on my FReeper-in-Laws ...
Edited on Mon Sep-27-04 05:30 PM by Trajan
They try to fall back on the 'no actionable intelligence' rot .... but that memo titled 'Al Qaeda determined to strike in US' is simply too much to weasel out of ...

Georgie Boy went on a nice long vacation when our nation was threatened ...

George Bush did NOT protect america ....

They squirm like baptists in a catholic church when they hear it ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
28. I'd love to see the memo/the vacation and the "book" in one ad
discussing *'s colossal failure on 911.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. book in bookstore blames clinton for osama -
there are two long 4 shelf high books NEW on politics - I get so ANGRY when I see these lies and crap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. No backbone
Whats new?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandersadu Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Finally
I've been saying this for months. The simple fact is that the worst terrorist attack in our history happened on Bush's watch. Imagine if Gore had been president. Imagine what the repukes would have done:

(1) Impeach Gore (pretty self-explanatory)
(2) Every Repub. senator, congressman, governor and commentator would say that Gore couldn't be trusted w/ nat'l security b/c worst terrorist attack on nation's history.
(3) There's more, but I'm so frustrated that our guys haven't even mentioned this, that I'll stop now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
29. You said it!
They would never have let up. There would have been no UNITY after 911, they'd have eaten us alive with second guessing and blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. After Bush got a warning he went of vacation
I hope Kerry brings that up in the debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
30. That would be nice .. if they were holding it for "the right moment"
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. GOP: WHY did ASScroft refuse to fly commercial airlines in summer 2001????
There has been way too much silence on this documented fact:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/07/26/national/main303601.shtml
Ashcroft Flying High
WASHINGTON, July 26, 2001
<snip>
In response to inquiries from CBS News over why Ashcroft was traveling exclusively by leased jet aircraft instead of commercial airlines, the Justice Department cited what it called a "threat assessment" by the FBI, and said Ashcroft has been advised to travel only by private jet for the remainder of his term.

"There was a threat assessment and there are guidelines. He is acting under the guidelines," an FBI spokesman said. Neither the FBI nor the Justice Department, however, would identify what the threat was, when it was detected or who made it.
<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
31. OMG, of this I was not aware.
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. I said it in a recently published letter to the editor
and the freeps practically had coronaries. All they could do was sputter about Clinton. I hope that Kerry mentions it during each debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulpaul Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. Isn't the question who did 9/11 more appropriate?
Just read the interview with Stanley Hilton on www.letsroll911.org

He has conclusive evidence from US military officials and FBI officials that the Bush government ordered to plan and execute the attacks on WTC on 9/11.

Shocking? Perhaps. Now the taks to spread the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. stop with the 9/11 crap about drone planes
Edited on Mon Sep-27-04 05:52 PM by zappaman
"He has conclusive evidence from US military officials and FBI officials that the Bush government ordered to plan and execute the attacks on WTC on 9/11."
Please point out the "conclusive evidence".
It's stuff like this site and David Ickes who muddy the waters so the truth never gets out.

on edit-by "this site", I meant the letsroll911.org and not DU...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Hi paulpaul!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. It's a matter of doing what we can to win the election.
:hi:

Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
23. My debate wish:
For Kerry to plainly and flatly ask why this Pretzeldent continues to tie 9/11 Al Q to Iraq, when it has been shown over and over again that there is no link.


PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE, Kerry, do NOT use 'War on Terra' and 'Iraq' in the same sentence !!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. I hope he makes a similar statement as well ...
;) it's a good wish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dancing_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
33. If Democrats were brave enough to tell the truth BUSH&CHENEY DID IT
They would win, of course. But most aren't brave enough to face the evidence and the terrible truth.

Some such intellectual cowards in this forum might still attack me for telling the truth at this late date. Get the information, bust the cover-up and figure out what really happened for yourself:
http://911research.wtc7.net/index.html

If enough Democrats could face the truth themselves and make sharing it with there fellow citizens a real priority, we would win, of course. Otherwise, we shall certainly lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. I think Bush is too much of a nervous nelly to be involved in 911 so if it
was planned, I don't think they "told him" ... I used to believe they did, but now I think they sorta mold him like clay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
34. show them the 08/06/01 PDB: Bin Laden Determined to Attack in US
Go to http://somnamblst.tripod.com to download high resolution TIF or PDF files to print and distribute. Let's Michael Moore Bush by showing the sheeple the explicit warning BushCo ignored in 2001!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. That's great!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George W. Dunce Donating Member (389 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. As soon as Kerry says that all we will hear is
The 9/11 commission didn't blame Bush. They said it was a combination of that evil Bill Clinton and kinda, sorta in an abstract way Bush was almost responsible for not knowing Clinton goofed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
38. Terrorism wasn't even on their radar
There is no need to go on about what Bush knew and when he knew it. That can easily be dismissed as a conspiracy theory, even if there is a grain of truth there. No, the real point of attack should be how this administration got caught with its proverbial pants around its ankles, after having done absolutely nothing to even attempt to protect the US from an attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Yep.
Bush *vacationed* while the US was in danger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
40. Lol, I say it all the time, all I get in response is that it was Clinton's
fault, the rightwinged motto, when all else fails and you not your in deep shit, blame the democrat...they are told, they just choose not to believe it...I have seen many shows where the surrogates have stated the obvious, considering the media's obvious biased reporting these days, nine times out of ten, the all chorus together, "It's All Clinton's Fault"....

I've been awake long before this four year reign of inept bungling mudslinging rhetoric had begun, I hate to say it but it all began with Clinton;-) They went after him with all they had which was nothing actually;-)

It's kind of hard talking to brick walls that breathe nothing but mortar...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. True, but as I said to the campaign "Clinton isn't running"
who cares what they say about him?

At least if we put the blame for 911 where it belongs .. on G W BUSH some people may actually "think about it" :shrug: ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. True which is what we do, I believe they have a problem with
accountability, we could blame the parents?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. "start a new party altogether"
No need to do that just join The Green Party. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Nah, the Green Party won't defeat Bush.
And they are certainly lacking in perfection as well. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. LOL ... yeah that "personal responsibility" crap doens't apply to the R's
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarveyBriggs Donating Member (324 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
46. I'm not, I say it all the time.
The response is usually weak like,"Clinton's Fault."

The reply is easy, "But Bush was President. Can't he handle that responsibility? From what you tell me, he can't. And that's what worries me about your support of this irresponsible man, And what worries me about Bush as President."

Conversation is usuall over by then. Unless the righty poll all the terrorists he or she knows and tells me Osama supports Kerry.

Harvey Briggs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
48. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC